  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		cffd(at)pgrb.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 8:16 am    Post subject: EGTs and fuel quality | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Lynn,
 
 The 4 inch comment has my 2200 running its best.  My SN is 988, Bob Vossman 
 has SN 8XX.  He has more than one groove in his needle.  I think the carb 
 data from Jabiru also shows mine with 3 grooves.  My needle is a Bing and 
 not from the Jab tuning kit.  I will check my egt's one more time and then 
 attack the carb, if need be.
 
 Chuck
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   ________________________________  Message 2 
  _____________________________________
  Time: 12:10:47 PM PST US
  From: Lynn Matteson <lynnmatt(at)jps.net>
  Subject: Fwd: [jabiruengines] Re: EGTs and fuel quality
  Begin forwarded message:
 
 > From: Lynn Matteson <lynnmatt(at)jps.net>
 > Date: April 18, 2008 2:37:32 PM GMT-04:00
 > To: jabiruengines(at)yahoogroups.com
 > Subject: Re: [jabiruengines] Re: EGTs and fuel quality
 >
 > Chuck-
 > You may not have another groove to move the clip to...mine only had
 > one groove, but I'm serial #2062, with 40mm Bing.
 > I've got the Bing Aircraft Manual (if I could put my hands on my
 
 | 	 
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics JabiruEngine-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?JabiruEngine-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Lynn Matteson
 
 
  Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 2778 Location: Grass Lake, Michigan
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 9:39 am    Post subject: EGTs and fuel quality | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Chuck-
 I just flew my newly-modified and installed air duct (from airbox to  
 carb) and it works fine. I'd say great, but it didn't even out the  
 EGT's like I hoped, but it did *seem* to give me more WOT rpm. Of  
 course the weather has changed since I last checked for WOT rpm, but  
 before I'd have to point the nose down just a little to get 3000 rpm.
 Today I could fly level and get 3130 rpm. Again, the air density  
 might have something to do with it. I'm also climbing out at about  
 90-100 rpm higher. It's a bitch to take down performance figures in  
 the cold air, and by the time the changes are made, the weather does  
 an "about face," and you have squat to compare to. Suffice it to say,  
 the engine runs good now, so be it air-straightening vanes or better  
 weather, I'm happy. One other thing I'm going to try...just for  
 kicks...is to swap the SCAT hose for some SCEET hose from airbox to  
 the vaned air duct. I just saw some SCEET hose, and that stuff is  
 smooth inside! For just a few bucks more per foot, I'm going for it.
 
 After the initial flight today, I also changed to a 2.78 needle jet,  
 up from the original 2.76 jet. (I had done this a few weeks ago, but  
 changed float level too, and the combo had the engine stumbling, so I  
 removed it at the time) That didn't change the EGT's all that much,  
 but it did chase the hot EGT from #4 over to #3. I wasn't in the mood  
 to write down a bunch of figures at the time, but I will, and report  
 what I find.
 
 My carb had the 2005 Economy Kit on board when I bought it, and the  
 jet and needle sizes were etched on the side of the carb. My needle  
 number ended in -1, meaning one groove, as I understand it, and  
 indeed it was a one-groove needle.
 
 Lynn Matteson
 Grass Lake, Michigan
 Kitfox IV Speedster  w/Jabiru 2200
 flying w/490+ hrs
 On Apr 19, 2008, at 12:13 PM, Chuck Deiterich wrote:
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   
  <cffd(at)pgrb.com>
 
  Lynn,
 
  The 4 inch comment has my 2200 running its best.  My SN is 988, Bob  
  Vossman has SN 8XX.  He has more than one groove in his needle.  I  
  think the carb data from Jabiru also shows mine with 3 grooves.  My  
  needle is a Bing and not from the Jab tuning kit.  I will check my  
  egt's one more time and then attack the carb, if need be.
 
  Chuck
 > ________________________________  Message 2  
 > _____________________________________
 > Time: 12:10:47 PM PST US
 > From: Lynn Matteson <lynnmatt(at)jps.net>
 > Subject: Fwd: [jabiruengines] Re: EGTs and fuel  
 > quality
 > Begin forwarded message:
 >
 >> From: Lynn Matteson <lynnmatt(at)jps.net>
 >> Date: April 18, 2008 2:37:32 PM GMT-04:00
 >> To: jabiruengines(at)yahoogroups.com
 >> Subject: Re: [jabiruengines] Re: EGTs and fuel quality
 >>
 >> Chuck-
 >> You may not have another groove to move the clip to...mine only had
 >> one groove, but I'm serial #2062, with 40mm Bing.
 >> I've got the Bing Aircraft Manual (if I could put my hands on my
 
 
 | 	 
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics JabiruEngine-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?JabiruEngine-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ Lynn
 
Kitfox IV-Jabiru 2200
 
N369LM | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Peter H
 
 
  Joined: 20 Mar 2007 Posts: 197
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 2:41 pm    Post subject: EGTs and fuel quality | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Lynn 
 I have also been chasing a better fuel/air distribution and have finished
 with the Bing because I was looking for better control of mixture. I have
 been test flying with a TBI conversion using a 45mm throttle body with two
 injectors controlled by ECU in the Q-200 airframe powered by the J3300.
 I have total control of mix and can over ride the fuel map using a
 potentiometer.
 But EGT is still uneven and it varies according to engine load and rpm. I am
 monitoring EGT at #5 and #6 and see even T at top of climb but then have
 seen up to 100degC variance as the load and rpm changes in level flight. I
 discussed this with one of the engineers at the factory. He has seen up to
 200 deg variance. His advice is to experiment with the intake hose as you
 have done but I do not believe it will solve for even EGT. The variance is
 worst when the engine is lean but the Bing has been set up to go rich above
 2700rpm. When my EGT variance was at its worst the engine began to shake
 because of the uneven power strokes R to L and I think this condition could
 contribute to the fly wheel bolt problem.
 Like you I have been testing for best rpm at WOT but I am over propped
 somewhat and the engine has only done about 40 hrs. It is too tight to re
 start when hot. I am getting a TAS of 184 KTS in the Quickie at 2950 RPM WOT
 but I think there is more potential.
 I think the uneven mix is caused by the lack of a reasonable sized induction
 manifold. The jab has only a collector of less than 1/2L capacity and
 induction pulses as valves close are interfering with the incoming fuel air
 mix. The condition varies with RPM.
 As an experiment I am making dual manifolds with a cross pipe using standard
 SS tube fittings in 64mm diameter x 1.6, The throttle body will feed the
 cross pipe from a 63mm tee. Total capacity is about 3.5L.
 I hope to test fly within a couple of weeks and will be able to report with
 pics then.
 If successful I have since found a source prepared to make the fittings in
 1.6mm Al tube. My SS manifold has added about 1.5KG net to the weight.The
 fittings are expensive .
 Peter
 --
 
  |  | - The Matronics JabiruEngine-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?JabiruEngine-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Lynn Matteson
 
 
  Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 2778 Location: Grass Lake, Michigan
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 3:18 pm    Post subject: EGTs and fuel quality | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Sounds exciting, Peter...be sure to let us know how it goes.
 
 Lynn Matteson
 Grass Lake, Michigan
 Kitfox IV Speedster  w/Jabiru 2200
 flying w/490+ hrs
 do not archive
 On Apr 19, 2008, at 6:37 PM, Peter Harris wrote:
 
 [quote] 
  <peterjfharris(at)bigpond.com>
 
  Lynn
  I have also been chasing a better fuel/air distribution and have  
  finished
  with the Bing because I was looking for better control of mixture.  
  I have
  been test flying with a TBI conversion using a 45mm throttle body  
  with two
  injectors controlled by ECU in the Q-200 airframe powered by the  
  J3300.
  I have total control of mix and can over ride the fuel map using a
  potentiometer.
  But EGT is still uneven and it varies according to engine load and  
  rpm. I am
  monitoring EGT at #5 and #6 and see even T at top of climb but then  
  have
  seen up to 100degC variance as the load and rpm changes in level  
  flight. I
  discussed this with one of the engineers at the factory. He has  
  seen up to
  200 deg variance. His advice is to experiment with the intake hose  
  as you
  have done but I do not believe it will solve for even EGT. The  
  variance is
  worst when the engine is lean but the Bing has been set up to go  
  rich above
  2700rpm. When my EGT variance was at its worst the engine began to  
  shake
  because of the uneven power strokes R to L and I think this  
  condition could
  contribute to the fly wheel bolt problem.
  Like you I have been testing for best rpm at WOT but I am over propped
  somewhat and the engine has only done about 40 hrs. It is too tight  
  to re
  start when hot. I am getting a TAS of 184 KTS in the Quickie at  
  2950 RPM WOT
  but I think there is more potential.
  I think the uneven mix is caused by the lack of a reasonable sized  
  induction
  manifold. The jab has only a collector of less than 1/2L capacity and
  induction pulses as valves close are interfering with the incoming  
  fuel air
  mix. The condition varies with RPM.
  As an experiment I am making dual manifolds with a cross pipe using  
  standard
  SS tube fittings in 64mm diameter x 1.6, The throttle body will  
  feed the
  cross pipe from a 63mm tee. Total capacity is about 3.5L.
  I hope to test fly within a couple of weeks and will be able to  
  report with
  pics then.
  If successful I have since found a source prepared to make the  
  fittings in
  1.6mm Al tube. My SS manifold has added about 1.5KG net to the  
  weight.The
  fittings are expensive .
  Peter
  --
 
  |  | - The Matronics JabiruEngine-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?JabiruEngine-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ Lynn
 
Kitfox IV-Jabiru 2200
 
N369LM | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		andy(at)suncoastjabiru.co Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 8:47 am    Post subject: EGTs and fuel quality | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Lynn,
 
 Good work on the improvements! I'm sure many of us have found the same
 situation of not knowing *exactly* what brings better performance,
 especially when we are talking about a few % only, but those RPM increases
 are significant. A note about SCEET ducting; I've used it with success on
 the intake. Someone once told me that SCAT ducting has an equivalent
 resistance of 23, meaning that 1 foot of SCAT ducting has the same
 resistance to airflow as 23 feet of smooth-bore pipe! SCEET will be better,
 but bear in mind one down-side which I'm sure won't affect you. The inner
 'skin' of the duct can perish and suck flat if given enough time and bad
 maintenance. It's a fair point, and a few A&Ps have told me it's a no-no to
 use it on anything below ambient pressure, i.e. a carburettor intake. My
 response (while being sympathetic to the argument) was that most
 Experimental aircraft get better maintenance than certificated types(!) and
 therefore the idea of a piece of duct not being internally inspected for
 (say) 5 years or more is less likely in our world (.....or is it??!!)
 
 Keep up the good work, Andy
 
 --
 
  |  | - The Matronics JabiruEngine-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?JabiruEngine-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Lynn Matteson
 
 
  Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 2778 Location: Grass Lake, Michigan
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:30 am    Post subject: EGTs and fuel quality | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Thanks for the input, Andy....I sure didn't know about, or probably  
 would not have thought about, the inner skin sucking in, but it makes  
 sense. I'll give that one some thought, but like you said, maintain  
 it and it'll probably be OK.
 
 Lynn Matteson
 Grass Lake, Michigan
 Kitfox IV Speedster  w/Jabiru 2200
 flying w/490+ hrs
 On Apr 20, 2008, at 12:43 PM, Andy Silvester wrote:
 
 [quote] 
  <andy(at)suncoastjabiru.com>
 
  Lynn,
 
  Good work on the improvements! I'm sure many of us have found the same
  situation of not knowing *exactly* what brings better performance,
  especially when we are talking about a few % only, but those RPM  
  increases
  are significant. A note about SCEET ducting; I've used it with  
  success on
  the intake. Someone once told me that SCAT ducting has an equivalent
  resistance of 23, meaning that 1 foot of SCAT ducting has the same
  resistance to airflow as 23 feet of smooth-bore pipe! SCEET will be  
  better,
  but bear in mind one down-side which I'm sure won't affect you. The  
  inner
  'skin' of the duct can perish and suck flat if given enough time  
  and bad
  maintenance. It's a fair point, and a few A&Ps have told me it's a  
  no-no to
  use it on anything below ambient pressure, i.e. a carburettor  
  intake. My
  response (while being sympathetic to the argument) was that most
  Experimental aircraft get better maintenance than certificated types 
  (!) and
  therefore the idea of a piece of duct not being internally  
  inspected for
  (say) 5 years or more is less likely in our world (.....or is it??!!)
 
  Keep up the good work, Andy
 
  --
 
  |  | - The Matronics JabiruEngine-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?JabiruEngine-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ Lynn
 
Kitfox IV-Jabiru 2200
 
N369LM | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |