 |
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
clint_bazzill(at)hotmail. Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:46 am Post subject: Sport Pilot |
|
|
I think that an inflight adjustable prop is ok, keep the switch in the
engine compartment. Clint
From: Jimmie Blackwell <jimmieblackwell(at)sbcglobal.net>
Reply-To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Sport Pilot
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 07:20:27 -0800 (PST)
<jimmieblackwell(at)sbcglobal.net>
It is documented in Part 1 of the Sport Pilot ruling under Definitions and
Abbreviations.
The definition says in part, "Light-sport aircraft means an aircraft,
other than a helicopter or powered-lift that, since its original
certification, has continued to meet the following: (7) A fixed or
ground-adjustable propeller if a powered aircraft other than a glider".
I certainly agree that one should be able to change an in-flight
adjustable prop to a fixed pitch prop on a Model IV and fly it under sport
pilot rules. However, the above rule is pretty clear and my conversations
with AOPA and EAA indicate that the FAA has no intention of backing off.
I think the important thing for anyone considering buying an airplane
that they think is ok for a sport pilot to fly should check the history to
make sure as to how the plane was originally certified.
Hope this helps.
Jimmie
flier <FLIER(at)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Jimmie,
Any prop change is a major that usually requires a
new test phase as well as new airworthiness
documentation. I can't imagine that going through
that process and having a legal airworthy aircraft
that meets the limitations of a Sport Pilot rating
could NOT be flown by a Sport Pilot?? Where is that
documented?
Thanks,
Ted
--- Original Message ---
From: Jimmie Blackwell
To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Sport Pilot
>
>
>I do not know if AOPA is in correct, but I do know
that for an airplane to be qualified for Sport Pilot
it must have been originally certified and
continually maintained at a maximum gross weight of
1320 lbs. and other criteria such as a fixed pitch or
ground adjustable prop. For example, if a Kitfox
ever had an inflight adjustable prop it can never be
legally flown by someone flying under sport pilot
rules. I know it does not make sense, but that is
the rule. Let's be glad that the rule is there,
though it is not perfect.
>
> Jimmie
>
>Jim Crowder wrote:
>
>
>AOPA Says:
>>* You can modify your aircraft (if you're the
manufacturer) to
>>meet the definition of LSA.
>
>This seems pretty clear to me. Is AOPA incorrect?
>
>Jim Crowder
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_-
======================================================
======
browse
Subscriptions page,
FAQ,
List
>_-
======================================================
======
Admin.
>_-
======================================================
======
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jimlc(at)att.net Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:53 am Post subject: Sport Pilot |
|
|
At 09:44 AM 3/9/2006, you wrote:
Quote: | I think that an inflight adjustable prop is ok, keep the switch in the
engine compartment. Clint
|
I thought the same thing, but I think I will change it, lower my
actual aircraft empty weight, and use that and the resulting lower
performance as my excuse as manufacturer for lowering my gross weight
to 1320 lbs.
Jim Crowder
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
roncarolnikko(at)hotmail. Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:28 am Post subject: Sport Pilot |
|
|
Agreed! I registered N117AF ELSA and regret it. Even though I am a PPL I
can never fly it at night, over town, or for aerobatics, etc... Ron NB
Ore
Quote: | From: "jdmcbean" <jdmcbean(at)cableone.net>
Reply-To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
To: <kitfox-list(at)matronics.com>
Subject: RE: Sport Pilot
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 09:42:31 -0700
This can be a heated discussion as I have had my fare share of discussion
about this...
Lets make sure that we do not confuse:
Sport Pilot is the persons license and has nothing to do with aircraft.
Other then you can fly one.
Light Sport Aircraft (LSA) is the Aircrafts license (Certificate Category)
Under this category is: LSA
ELSA
SLSA
If you are building an aircraft that qualifies as AB I would not recommend
registering in any of the above categories. Keep it in the Experimental AB
category. As long as it meets the definition of what a Sport Pilot can fly
then it can be flown by a Sport Pilot or above.
As for the Gross weight... If you are flying a Model IV or earlier model
then it's not an issue... If you are flying a Model 5 or newer that has
been
registered at a higher then 1320 Gross then it's up for discussion..
Personally... I feel it can be done and without too much headache. A little
hoop jumping maybe... and this is where it gets heated..
Fly Safe !!
John McBean
www.sportplanellc.com
"The Sky is not the Limit... It's a Playground"
|
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
georgewells(at)adelphia.n Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:05 am Post subject: Sport Pilot |
|
|
According to my FSDO -- You can put any gross wgt you want on an experimental aircraft (not a certifed plane)
My mod 5 has a 1550 Gross and all I have to do is put a new plate on it listing a 1320 gross.
But like the FSDO said don't exceed the 1320 then because you will be illegal.
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jimmieblackwell(at)sbcglo Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:07 am Post subject: Sport Pilot |
|
|
I do not want to beat this horse to much, but I went down that road and the bottom line is that a Kitfox that has or had an in-flight adjustable prop can never be legally flown by someone operating under sport pilot rules. I don't like the rule either.
Before you move the switch suggest you talk to Joe Norris at EAA.
Jimmie
Jim Crowder <jimlc(at)att.net> wrote:
At 09:44 AM 3/9/2006, you wrote:
Quote: | I think that an inflight adjustable prop is ok, keep the switch in the
engine compartment. Clint
|
I thought the same thing, but I think I will change it, lower my
actual aircraft empty weight, and use that and the resulting lower
performance as my excuse as manufacturer for lowering my gross weight
to 1320 lbs.
Jim Crowder
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jdmcbean(at)cableone.net Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:16 am Post subject: Sport Pilot |
|
|
Loose the term in-flight adjustable... electric adjustable.
Fly Safe !!
John McBean
www.sportplanellc.com
"The Sky is not the Limit... It's a Playground"
--
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jimlc(at)att.net Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:09 am Post subject: Sport Pilot |
|
|
At 11:13 AM 3/9/2006, you wrote:
Quote: | Loose the term in-flight adjustable... electric adjustable.
Fly Safe !!
John McBean
|
What are the ramifications of this?
Jim Crowder
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
FLIER(at)sbcglobal.net Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:11 am Post subject: Sport Pilot |
|
|
Jimmie,
IMHO that's not correct. An experimental AB aircraft
with an approved airworthy fixed pitch or ground
adjustable can be flown by a Sport Pilot regardless
of its history.
The aircraft cannot become registered as an LSA but a
Sport Pilot can fly it.
--- Original Message ---
From: Jimmie Blackwell <jimmieblackwell(at)sbcglobal.net>
To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Sport Pilot
Quote: |
<jimmieblackwell(at)sbcglobal.net>
|
Quote: |
I do not want to beat this horse to much, but I went
down that road and the bottom line is that a Kitfox
|
that has or had an in-flight adjustable prop can
never be legally flown by someone operating under
sport pilot rules. I don't like the rule either.
Quote: |
Before you move the switch suggest you talk to
Joe Norris at EAA.
|
Quote: |
Jimmie
Jim Crowder <jimlc(at)att.net> wrote:
At 09:44 AM 3/9/2006, you wrote:
>I think that an inflight adjustable prop is ok,
keep the switch in the
|
Quote: | >engine compartment. Clint
I thought the same thing, but I think I will change
it, lower my
|
Quote: | actual aircraft empty weight, and use that and the
resulting lower
|
Quote: | performance as my excuse as manufacturer for
lowering my gross weight
|
Quote: | to 1320 lbs.
Jim Crowder
_-
======================================================
|
======
browse
Subscriptions page,
FAQ,
List
Quote: | _-
======================================================
|
======
Admin.
Quote: | _-
======================================================
|
======
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jose_m_toro(at)yahoo.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:25 am Post subject: Sport Pilot |
|
|
This is valid before the aircraft is certified. Once
certified, there is no reverse, i.e., if if was
certified at 1550 Gross, it can't be changed.
Jose
--- "George Wells(at)adelphia.net"
<georgewells(at)adelphia.net> wrote:
Quote: |
Wells(at)adelphia.net" <georgewells(at)adelphia.net>
According to my FSDO -- You can put any gross wgt
you want on an experimental aircraft (not a certifed
plane)
My mod 5 has a 1550 Gross and all I have to do is
put a new plate on it listing a 1320 gross.
But like the FSDO said don't exceed the 1320 then
because you will be illegal.
browse
Subscriptions page,
FAQ,
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Admin.
|
Jose M. Toro, P.E.
Kitfox II/582->Jabiru 2200
"A slow flight in the Caribbean..."
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hank(at)hankseidel.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:38 am Post subject: Sport Pilot |
|
|
Aren't there STC kits for the installation of larger engines in
production aircraft that allow for an increase in GW. Isn't that
possible with a homebuilt?
On Mar 9, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Jose M. Toro wrote:
Quote: |
<jose_m_toro(at)yahoo.com>
This is valid before the aircraft is certified. Once
certified, there is no reverse, i.e., if if was
certified at 1550 Gross, it can't be changed.
Jose
--- "George Wells(at)adelphia.net"
<georgewells(at)adelphia.net> wrote:
>
> Wells(at)adelphia.net" <georgewells(at)adelphia.net>
>
> According to my FSDO -- You can put any gross wgt
> you want on an experimental aircraft (not a certifed
> plane)
> My mod 5 has a 1550 Gross and all I have to do is
> put a new plate on it listing a 1320 gross.
> But like the FSDO said don't exceed the 1320 then
> because you will be illegal.
>
>
> browse
> Subscriptions page,
> FAQ,
> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
>
> Admin.
>
Jose M. Toro, P.E.
Kitfox II/582->Jabiru 2200
"A slow flight in the Caribbean..."
|
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jimmieblackwell(at)sbcglo Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:04 pm Post subject: Sport Pilot |
|
|
I respect your opinion. I do ask that you please understand that I thoroughly researched this subject months ago. My biggest concern is that someone will be misled into thinking that they can take an in-flight adjustable prop off a kitfox and replace it with a ground adjustable and make it a legal machine to be flown by someone operating under sport pilot rules. Remember, when an aircraft is certified, the certification record shows the type prop and this is a matter of record with the FAA.
Please do not take my word for this. Call EAA and ask.
I will not comment any further on this subject on the list. If anyone wishes to discuss my research on this matter please call me at 512 258-7020. Would be happy to hear from you.
Jimmie
Jimmie,
IMHO that's not correct. An experimental AB aircraft
with an approved airworthy fixed pitch or ground
adjustable can be flown by a Sport Pilot regardless
of its history.
The aircraft cannot become registered as an LSA but a
Sport Pilot can fly it.
--- Original Message ---
From: Jimmie Blackwell
To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Sport Pilot
Quote: |
I do not want to beat this horse to much, but I went
down that road and the bottom line is that a Kitfox
|
that has or had an in-flight adjustable prop can
never be legally flown by someone operating under
sport pilot rules. I don't like the rule either.
Quote: |
Before you move the switch suggest you talk to
Joe Norris at EAA.
|
Quote: |
Jimmie
Jim Crowder wrote:
At 09:44 AM 3/9/2006, you wrote:
>I think that an inflight adjustable prop is ok,
keep the switch in the
|
Quote: | >engine compartment. Clint
I thought the same thing, but I think I will change
it, lower my
|
Quote: | actual aircraft empty weight, and use that and the
resulting lower
|
Quote: | performance as my excuse as manufacturer for
lowering my gross weight
|
Quote: | to 1320 lbs.
Jim Crowder
_-
======================================================
|
======
browse
Subscriptions page,
FAQ,
List
Quote: | _-
======================================================
|
======
Admin.
Quote: | _-
======================================================
|
======
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alnanarthur(at)sbcglobal. Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:10 pm Post subject: Sport Pilot |
|
|
Hi again Jim,
If , when you applied for your original Special Airworthiness
Certificate (Experimental) you stated that you had an in-flight
adjustable propeller and/or a gross weight greater than 1320#, "
you're screwed".
You referenced the AOPA web site info which I copied and pasted here:
Can I change the weight of an experimental amateur-built that I
have built so it meets the 1,320-pound limit for light sport aircraft?
As the builder of a home-built airplane that has yet to receive its
experimental airworthiness certificate, you may decrease or increase
the weight as necessary to have the airplane meet the definition of
light sport aircraft, which is defined as having a maximum gross
weight of 1,320 pounds. However, once a weight limit has been set as
part of the airplane's experimental amateur-built certification
process, the original builder, future owners, and repairmen are
prohibited from making any modifications to the weight for the
purpose of meeting the definition of light sport aircraft.
Updated Wednesday, February 08, 2006 10:47:15 AM
On Mar 9, 2006, at 8:05 AM, Jim Crowder wrote:
Quote: |
At 08:27 AM 3/9/2006, you wrote:
> Jim,
>
> You might talk to your local Flight Standards Office about de-
> registering the aircraft and using it for parts to build a completely
> different experimental aircraft.
This was my previous plan. It now appears unnecessary.
Jim Crowder
|
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dan(at)azshowersolutions. Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:31 pm Post subject: Sport Pilot |
|
|
Geeze, I just got home and checked the e-mails.You guys not only beat the dead horse...you turned it into hamburger! ha
Good discussion though. Just to clarify, I wasn't really looking to register as anything other than experimental. I simply asked the question (about LSA) out of curiosity and got the no way Hosea answer. Funny though, (and this was brought up earlier), the plane IS still a kit and has never been issued an airworthyness cert. so, if I were nutz and wanted to pursue the red tape monster a little more...I suppose I could press the issue. Not a chance though because I do have an adjustable prop I will be installing in front of the 912s.
Cheers,
Dan
www.azshowersolutions.com/Kitfox1.html
alnanarthur <alnanarthur(at)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Hi again Jim,
If , when you applied for your original Special Airworthiness
Certificate (Experimental) you stated that you had an in-flight
adjustable propeller and/or a gross weight greater than 1320#, "
you're screwed".
You referenced the AOPA web site info which I copied and pasted here:
Can I change the weight of an experimental amateur-built that I
have built so it meets the 1,320-pound limit for light sport aircraft?
As the builder of a home-built airplane that has yet to receive its
experimental airworthiness certificate, you may decrease or increase
the weight as necessary to have the airplane meet the definition of
light sport aircraft, which is defined as having a maximum gross
weight of 1,320 pounds. However, once a weight limit has been set as
part of the airplane's experimental amateur-built certification
process, the original builder, future owners, and repairmen are
prohibited from making any modifications to the weight for the
purpose of meeting the definition of light sport aircraft.
Updated Wednesday, February 08, 2006 10:47:15 AM
On Mar 9, 2006, at 8:05 AM, Jim Crowder wrote:
Quote: |
At 08:27 AM 3/9/2006, you wrote:
> Jim,
>
> You might talk to your local Flight Standards Office about de-
> registering the aircraft and using it for parts to build a completely
> different experimental aircraft.
This was my previous plan. It now appears unnecessary.
Jim Crowder
|
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Malcolmbru(at)AOL.COM Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:42 pm Post subject: Sport Pilot |
|
|
Dan unless you are very confident your medical condition will out live this
airplane I would lean toward qualifying for sport pilot. It may be worth
more money being a little heaver with more options but you may need to sell it
if you loose your medical. mal
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jimlc(at)att.net Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 12:11 am Post subject: Sport Pilot |
|
|
At 04:10 PM 3/9/2006, you wrote:
Quote: | You referenced the AOPA web site info which I copied and pasted here:
Can I change the weight of an experimental amateur-built that I
have built so it meets the 1,320-pound limit for light sport aircraft?
As the builder of a home-built airplane that has yet to receive its
experimental airworthiness certificate, you may decrease or increase
the weight as necessary to have the airplane meet the definition of
light sport aircraft, which is defined as having a maximum gross
weight of 1,320 pounds. However, once a weight limit has been set as
part of the airplane's experimental amateur-built certification
process, the original builder, future owners, and repairmen are
prohibited from making any modifications to the weight for the
purpose of meeting the definition of light sport aircraft.
|
You are correct. In plain English, this paragraph is in direct
conflict with the one I quoted, but I did find this one later on. I
will now see if I can perhaps surrender my current airworthiness
certificate, keep the fuselage, replace the total power system, and
create a lighter plane with a gross weight of 1320 lbs. and otherwise
meet the requirements.
Jim Crowder
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dan(at)azshowersolutions. Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:51 am Post subject: Sport Pilot |
|
|
Mal, That is an interesting thought. I'm sure many of us don't anticipate loosing our medical any time soon, yet, life can blindside us sometimes. Let me throw this out to see if I am correct in my understanding...
If I loose my medical I'm grounded permanently. There is no way I could jump over to Sport PIlot.
If I get the Sport Pilot ticket now and loose my medical in the future, I can still fly a plane that the Sport Pilot rules allow. Is that the correct scoop?
Thanks, Dan
www.azshowersolutions.com/Kitfox1.html
Malcolmbru(at)aol.com wrote:
Dan unless you are very confident your medical condition will out live this
airplane I would lean toward qualifying for sport pilot. It may be worth
more money being a little heaver with more options but you may need to sell it
if you loose your medical. mal
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
aldaniels(at)fmtc.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:05 am Post subject: Sport Pilot |
|
|
You can usually get your medical back, but it can be a pain and very
expensive to keep up.( I just talked to a pilot that pays $3000 per year
for test because he put on his medical form that he thought he might
have had a Kidney stone. The FAA requires him to take these test every
12 months, and it has been going on for several years.) You would
usually know if you are not going to pass a medical, and as long as you
did not fail one you are OK SP. If you fail a medical you need to get a
waver on the condition and get a valid medical, and then never take
another medical. Example. If you start cancer treatment but still have a
valid medical, just don't go for another medical and you are OK to fly,
provided you feel you are safe to fly. This is really unfair as you
might have failed a medical in the past for something you can not get a
waver for, and so can never fly, but someone with exactly the same
condition, but maybe in much worse health that has never had a medical
is legal to fly. You just have to love what we pay these people to do
for us.
Dan Billingsley wrote:
Quote: |
Mal, That is an interesting thought. I'm sure many of us don't anticipate loosing our medical any time soon, yet, life can blindside us sometimes. Let me throw this out to see if I am correct in my understanding...
If I loose my medical I'm grounded permanently. There is no way I could jump over to Sport PIlot.
If I get the Sport Pilot ticket now and loose my medical in the future, I can still fly a plane that the Sport Pilot rules allow. Is that the correct scoop?
Thanks, Dan
www.azshowersolutions.com/Kitfox1.html
Malcolmbru(at)aol.com wrote:
Dan unless you are very confident your medical condition will out live this
airplane I would lean toward qualifying for sport pilot. It may be worth
more money being a little heaver with more options but you may need to sell it
if you loose your medical. mal
|
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jdmcbean(at)cableone.net Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:41 am Post subject: Sport Pilot |
|
|
Dan,
If you are a licensed Private Pilot and let your medical expire. Not
revoked, suspended or denied. Then you can operate a LSA aircraft as a
Sport Pilot. Of course there are training requirements but in your case you
have the time in type. If you go in to renew your medical and it is denied
then you are grounded. You would have to get your Medical back or get a
Special Issuance Medical before you could fly again.. then let the medical
expire. There still is the FAR that one must self certify that they are
physically and mentally competent to complete the flight. (catch 22)
Fly Safe !!
John & Debra McBean
www.sportplanellc.com
"The Sky is not the Limit... It's a Playground"
--
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kerrjohna(at)comcast.net Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 8:06 am Post subject: Sport Pilot |
|
|
Jim, you may be in for disappointment. The quote below is from the AOPA answer to the question.
"As the builder of a home-built airplane that has yet to receive its experimental airworthiness certificate, you may decrease or increase
Quote: | the weight as necessary to have the airplane meet the definition of
light sport aircraft, which is defined as having a maximum gross
weight of 1,320 pounds.
|
Now for the hammer.....
However, once a weight limit has been set as
Quote: | part of the airplane's experimental amateur-built certification
process, the original builder, future owners, and repairmen are
prohibited from making any modifications to the weight for the
purpose of meeting the definition of light sport aircraft.
|
does not sound promising.
John Kerr
-------------- Original message --------------
From: Jim Crowder <jimlc(at)att.net>
Quote: |
At 04:10 PM 3/9/2006, you wrote:
>You referenced the AOPA web site info which I copied and pasted here:
>
> Can I change the weight of an experimental amateur-built that I
>have built so it meets the 1,320-pound limit for light sport aircraft?
>As the builder of a home-built airplane that has yet to receive its
>experimental airworthiness certificate, you may decrease or increase
>the weight as necessary to have the airplane meet the definition of
>light sport aircraft, which is defined as having a maximum gross
>weight of 1,320 pounds. However, once a weight limit has been set as
>part of the airplane's experimental amateur-built certification
>process, the original builder, future owners, and repairmen are
>prohibited from making any modifications to the weight for the
>purpose of meeting the definition of light sport aircraft.
You are correct. In plain English, this paragraph is in direct
conflict with the one I quoted, but I did find this one later on. I
will now see if I can perhaps surrender my current airworthiness
certificate, keep the fuselage, replace the total power system, and
create a lighter plane with a gross weight of 1320 lbs. and otherwise
meet the requirements.
Jim Crowder
|
Jim, you may be in for disappointment. The quote below is from the AOPA answer to the question.
"As the builder of a home-built airplane that has yet to receive its experimental airworthiness certificate, you may decrease or increase
the weight as necessary to have the airplane meet the definition of
light sport aircraft, which is defined as having a maximum gross
weight of 1,320 pounds.
Now for the hammer.....
However, once a weight limit has been set as
part of the airplane's experimental amateur-built certification
process, the original builder, future owners, and repairmen are
prohibited from making any modifications to the weight for the
purpose of meeting the definition of light sport aircraft.
does not sound promising.
John Kerr
-------------- Original message --------------
From: Jim Crowder jimlc(at)att.net
-- Kitfox-List message posted by: Jim Crowder <JIMLC(at)ATT.NET>
At 04:10 PM 3/9/2006, you wrote:
You referenced the AOPA web site info which I copied and pasted here:
Can I change the weight of an experimental amateur-built that I
have built so it meets the 1,320-pound limit for light sport aircraft?
As the builder of a home-built airplane that has yet to receive its
experimental airworthiness certificate, you may decrease or increase
the weight as necessary to have the airplane meet the definition of
light sport aircraft, which is defined as having a maximum gross
weight of 1,320 pounds. However, once a weight limit has been set as
part o
f the airplane's experimental amateur-built certification
process, the original builder, future owners, and repairmen are
prohibited from making any modifications to the weight for the
purpose of meeting the definition of light sport aircraft.
You are correct. In plain English, this paragraph is in direct
conflict with the one I quoted, but I did find this one later on. I
will now see if I can perhaps surrender my current airworthiness
certificate, keep the fuselage, replace the total power system, and
create a lighter plane with a gross weight of 1320 lbs. and otherwise
meet the requirements.
Jim Crowder
uch as the Subscriptions page,
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alnanarthur(at)sbcglobal. Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 8:13 am Post subject: Sport Pilot |
|
|
Jim,
I guess that I would first ask the local FAA folks some hypothetical
questions concerning assembling an experimental
aircraft from cannibalized parts from a de-registered aircraft.
And what a hypothetical person would need to do to register
said aircraft. How to prove 51% and so forth. I would also get an
new N number to start a completely new history for the new airplane.
My Kitfox 5 is certified with a gross weight of 1232# since I
finished building prior to the final rule.
Allan & Nancy Arthur
Kitfox 5, N40AA
Rotax 912s, Warpdrive 3 blade
Byron Airport (C83) Hanger C8
Quote: |
I will now see if I can perhaps surrender my current airworthiness
certificate, keep the fuselage, replace the total power system, and
create a lighter plane with a gross weight of 1320 lbs. and otherwise
meet the requirements.
Jim Crowder
|
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|