 |
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
GrummanDude
Joined: 15 Jan 2006 Posts: 926 Location: Auburn, CA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:01 am Post subject: Plane Power alternator |
|
|
Remember a few months ago when I asked what other's experience was with PP alternators? At the time, I had installed a new PP alternator that was very noisy. A couple of other PP owners also wrote to say theirs was noisy also. My customer sent his alternator to PP to have them check it. It came back saying it was in specs. It was still very noisy. He installed an overhauled Kelly alternator that was quiet.
PP needs to tighten up their specs.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 8, 2010, at 12:59 PM, teamgrumman(at)aol.com (teamgrumman(at)aol.com) wrote:
[quote]We're 'negotiating' right now. He has done a lot of modified alternators and thinks he can by-pass any testing based on his data and the previous flight test data. Keep your fingers crossed.
--
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
_________________ Gary
AuCountry Aviation
Home of Team Grumman |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
v1rotate(at)verizon.net Guest
|
Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 11:31 am Post subject: Plane Power alternator |
|
|
Gary,
Don't know if you were able to see my post today on the GG responding to Les Staples minimizing the PP alternator noise issue. They appear to be in denial about this. The noise really bothers Allisen when she flys with me. One reason, beyond my own personal preferences, that I try to keep the plane so nice is so that Allisen has confidence in the machinery and is comfortable on our trips. It irks me when something like this noise deal intrudes on that objective. My GG post stated that there is no way you could have a problem with an alernator installation unless the unit istelf had issues. Incidentally, we still want to fly up to Auburn. The weather just hasn't settled down yet from winter leftovers.
Bill
[quote] Remember a few months ago when I asked what other's experience was with PP alternators? At the time, I had installed a new PP alternator that was very noisy. A couple of other PP owners also wrote to say theirs was noisy also. My customer sent his alternator to PP to have them check it. It came back saying it was in specs. It was still very noisy. He installed an overhauled Kelly alternator that was quiet.
PP needs to tighten up their specs.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 8, 2010, at 12:59 PM, teamgrumman(at)aol.com (teamgrumman(at)aol.com) wrote:
[quote] We're 'negotiating' right now. He has done a lot of modified alternators and thinks he can by-pass any testing based on his data and the previous flight test data. Keep your fingers crossed.
-----Original Message-----
From: flyv35b <flyv35b(at)minetfiber.com (flyv35b(at)minetfiber.com)>
To: [url=mailto:teamgrumman-list(at)matronics.com]teamgrumman-list(at)matronics.com (teamgrumman-list(at)matronics.com)[/url]
Sent: Wed, Apr 7, 2010 6:29 am
Subject: Re: AG5B and the Jaguar cowling
Gary, I didn't realize that was the case with your baffling. That sounds like a welcome improvement for accessibility to the alternator.
I realize that logic does not play an important role in their decision making many times but it sounds like it is your DER that is making the decision as to whether another cooling test should be run or not. Doesn't he have the authority to make such a decision based on the facts and info available?
Cliff
[quote] ---
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GrummanDude
Joined: 15 Jan 2006 Posts: 926 Location: Auburn, CA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 12:03 pm Post subject: Plane Power alternator |
|
|
Bill,
During your annual, we'll take your alternator to a place I use and have them check it. If needed, we'll have them replace diodes. I agree, PP needs to make, not only a lighter mousetrap, but a better mousetrap. Otherwise what's the point? I have a new PP alternator on my shelf for my plane. If it isn't a better alternative to a Kelly rebuild, then I'm going to stop recommending them.
Gary
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 12, 2010, at 12:27 PM, "WILLIAM KELLY" <v1rotate(at)verizon.net (v1rotate(at)verizon.net)> wrote:
[quote] Gary,
Don't know if you were able to see my post today on the GG responding to Les Staples minimizing the PP alternator noise issue. They appear to be in denial about this. The noise really bothers Allisen when she flys with me. One reason, beyond my own personal preferences, that I try to keep the plane so nice is so that Allisen has confidence in the machinery and is comfortable on our trips. It irks me when something like this noise deal intrudes on that objective. My GG post stated that there is no way you could have a problem with an alernator installation unless the unit istelf had issues. Incidentally, we still want to fly up to Auburn. The weather just hasn't settled down yet from winter leftovers.
Bill
[quote] Remember a few months ago when I asked what other's experience was with PP alternators? At the time, I had installed a new PP alternator that was very noisy. A couple of other PP owners also wrote to say theirs was noisy also. My customer sent his alternator to PP to have them check it. It came back saying it was in specs. It was still very noisy. He installed an overhauled Kelly alternator that was quiet.
PP needs to tighten up their specs.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 8, 2010, at 12:59 PM, [url=mailto:teamgrumman(at)aol.com]teamgrumman(at)aol.com (teamgrumman(at)aol.com)[/url] wrote:
[quote] We're 'negotiating' right now. He has done a lot of modified alternators and thinks he can by-pass any testing based on his data and the previous flight test data. Keep your fingers crossed.
-----Original Message-----
From: flyv35b <[url=mailto:flyv35b(at)minetfiber.com]flyv35b(at)minetfiber.com (flyv35b(at)minetfiber.com)[/url]>
To: (teamgrumman-list(at)matronics.com)[url=mailto:teamgrumman-list(at)matronics.com]teamgrumman-list(at)matronics.com (teamgrumman-list(at)matronics.com)[/url]
Sent: Wed, Apr 7, 2010 6:29 am
Subject: Re: AG5B and the Jaguar cowling
Gary, I didn't realize that was the case with your baffling. That sounds like a welcome improvement for accessibility to the alternator.
I realize that logic does not play an important role in their decision making many times but it sounds like it is your DER that is making the decision as to whether another cooling test should be run or not. Doesn't he have the authority to make such a decision based on the facts and info available?
Cliff
[quote] ---
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
_________________ Gary
AuCountry Aviation
Home of Team Grumman |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
md11strejo(at)YAHOO.COM Guest
|
Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 12:23 pm Post subject: Plane Power alternator |
|
|
I've had a PP alternator on my AA5B for about 3yrs now. It has never given me any problems at all. No noise or any other problems.
Scott Trejo
N499GT
On Apr 13, 2010, at 12:18 PM, G Vogt wrote:
[quote]Bill,
During your annual, we'll take your alternator to a place I use and have them check it. If needed, we'll have them replace diodes. I agree, PP needs to make, not only a lighter mousetrap, but a better mousetrap. Otherwise what's the point? I have a new PP alternator on my shelf for my plane. If it isn't a better alternative to a Kelly rebuild, then I'm going to stop recommending them.
Gary
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 12, 2010, at 12:27 PM, "WILLIAM KELLY" <v1rotate(at)verizon.net (v1rotate(at)verizon.net)> wrote:
[quote] Gary,
Don't know if you were able to see my post today on the GG responding to Les Staples minimizing the PP alternator noise issue. They appear to be in denial about this. The noise really bothers Allisen when she flys with me. One reason, beyond my own personal preferences, that I try to keep the plane so nice is so that Allisen has confidence in the machinery and is comfortable on our trips. It irks me when something like this noise deal intrudes on that objective. My GG post stated that there is no way you could have a problem with an alernator installation unless the unit istelf had issues. Incidentally, we still want to fly up to Auburn. The weather just hasn't settled down yet from winter leftovers.
Bill
[quote] Remember a few months ago when I asked what other's experience was with PP alternators? At the time, I had installed a new PP alternator that was very noisy. A couple of other PP owners also wrote to say theirs was noisy also. My customer sent his alternator to PP to have them check it. It came back saying it was in specs. It was still very noisy. He installed an overhauled Kelly alternator that was quiet.
PP needs to tighten up their specs.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 8, 2010, at 12:59 PM, (teamgrumman(at)aol.com)teamgrumman(at)aol.com (teamgrumman(at)aol.com) wrote:
[quote] We're 'negotiating' right now. He has done a lot of modified alternators and thinks he can by-pass any testing based on his data and the previous flight test data. Keep your fingers crossed.
-----Original Message-----
From: flyv35b < (flyv35b(at)minetfiber.com)flyv35b(at)minetfiber.com (flyv35b(at)minetfiber.com)>
To: (teamgrumman-list(at)matronics.com) (teamgrumman-list(at)matronics.com)teamgrumman-list(at)matronics.com (teamgrumman-list(at)matronics.com)
Sent: Wed, Apr 7, 2010 6:29 am
Subject: Re: AG5B and the Jaguar cowling
Gary, I didn't realize that was the case with your baffling. That sounds like a welcome improvement for accessibility to the alternator.
I realize that logic does not play an important role in their decision making many times but it sounds like it is your DER that is making the decision as to whether another cooling test should be run or not. Doesn't he have the authority to make such a decision based on the facts and info available?
Cliff
[quote] ---
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Discover
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 429
|
Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:43 pm Post subject: Plane Power alternator |
|
|
I've had a 24volt PP alternator on my Tiger for 4 years without any whining until last flight when Grumman Gary was sitting in the copilot seat. No the whining was not Gary but the alternator. The street lamps would light up when Gary drove under them too. I think that Gary has too much energy and his brain waves are interferring with the magnetic fields. This theory may also explain why Gary's JPI grounded probes read higher than the EI nongrounded probes.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Street_light_interference?wasRedirected=true
Some guys just have it....
Sent from my iPhone
[quote]
[b]
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
v1rotate(at)verizon.net Guest
|
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 12:52 am Post subject: Plane Power alternator |
|
|
Gary,
Okay. Also, it will have been five years since Fletcher replaced the flexible fluid lines in the engine compartment, so I think it will be time for new ones again this year. I recall it as a five year interval. If you need to take measurements ahead of time for ordering the correct lengths, maybe we could do that on a side trip to Auburn.
Bill
[quote] Bill,
During your annual, we'll take your alternator to a place I use and have them check it. If needed, we'll have them replace diodes. I agree, PP needs to make, not only a lighter mousetrap, but a better mousetrap. Otherwise what's the point? I have a new PP alternator on my shelf for my plane. If it isn't a better alternative to a Kelly rebuild, then I'm going to stop recommending them.
Gary
[b]
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GrummanDude
Joined: 15 Jan 2006 Posts: 926 Location: Auburn, CA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 9:59 am Post subject: Plane Power alternator |
|
|
Hi Scott,
I've received several reports of good PP alternators. BUT, if there IS a problem and PPs answer to it is, "That's just the way it is." and doesn't replace it or tighten up their specs to where SOME are not noisy, then it's hard for me to recommend the alternator.
Let's put it this way: if I were the President of the company, I would be making damn sure the product I was selling had zero defects.
Gary
--
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
_________________ Gary
AuCountry Aviation
Home of Team Grumman |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GrummanDude
Joined: 15 Jan 2006 Posts: 926 Location: Auburn, CA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:00 am Post subject: Plane Power alternator |
|
|
Bill,
I don't have any measurements for the AA1x. So, that would be helpful.
Gary
--
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
_________________ Gary
AuCountry Aviation
Home of Team Grumman |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
md11strejo(at)YAHOO.COM Guest
|
Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 1:51 pm Post subject: Plane Power alternator |
|
|
Gary,
I agree with you 100%. PP should at the very least test the alternator and replace it if noise is present.
Scott Trejo
On Apr 14, 2010, at 12:57 PM, teamgrumman(at)AOL.COM (teamgrumman(at)AOL.COM) wrote:
[quote]Hi Scott,
I've received several reports of good PP alternators. BUT, if there IS a problem and PPs answer to it is, "That's just the way it is." and doesn't replace it or tighten up their specs to where SOME are not noisy, then it's hard for me to recommend the alternator.
Let's put it this way: if I were the President of the company, I would be making damn sure the product I was selling had zero defects.
Gary
--
| - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|