fish(at)aviation-tech.com
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 11:59 am Post subject: No Title |
 |
|
Bill,
This where membership in organizations like AOPA, EAA, WOA, CJAA and Red Star come in to play.
Contact them and let them handle the interaction with the FAA and clarifying the rules.
That will help prevent several interpretations of the same reg, and will keep everyone on track.
Also every member of those organizations add clout to their interaction with the government.
Think of it this way, if you were the government employee, would you rather get 10000+ calls from pilots.
Or two - three calls from organizations that represent the pilots.
Who is going to get the best results?
So, the best advice, don't kick the hornets nest.
Laterrrrrr
Avn-Tech
On 1/3/2012 9:34 AM, Bill Geipel wrote: [quote] I just made 3 more calls to DC. No luck.2 months ago I talked with the guy in charge of designee examiners. I explained that
It is an undo hardship on the pilots/students to pay $5000 for a type ride. His response, "Well it's like getting a type in a Lear.
You have to pay for the ride" I tried to explain the difference. You can imagine how that went. He said we have
Plenty of examiners to cover the need. ThIs of course took place prior to the new rule.
I called the Administrators office, no answer.
Still trying to carry our concerns to them. Stay tuned.
Bill
On Jan 3, 2012, at 8:41 AM, Jon Boede <jonboede(at)hotmail.com (jonboede(at)hotmail.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | Did the FAA do the weight and balance on this one before launching? Apparently not... given just the number of L-29 and L-39 guys in the country divided by the number of examiners makes this the "EAE 170% Employment Act of 2012".
I actually look forward to the little kick in the behind that getting ready for a checkride gives me, but locating an examiner and getting their schedule to mesh with mine is going to be a real pain in the rear.
Subject: Re: Re:
From: colyergreg(at)aol.com (colyergreg(at)aol.com)
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 15:10:08 -0800
To: l29-list(at)matronics.com (l29-list(at)matronics.com)
Yea, as of now it's an examiner....
Greg
415-531-0970
www.AceMakerAirshows.com
On Jan 2, 2012, at 2:13 PM, delfin <delfin_driver(at)yahoo.com (delfin_driver(at)yahoo.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | Thanks Bill and Greg. It was never clear to me whether any CFI that can give dual in the L-29 for example qualifies for this new FAA requirement. I will be looking forward to more info . thanks
From: Bill Geipel <czech6(at)mesanetworks.net (czech6(at)mesanetworks.net)>
To: "l29-list(at)matronics.com (l29-list(at)matronics.com)" <l29-list(at)matronics.com (l29-list(at)matronics.com)>
Sent: Monday, January 2, 2012 4:04 PM
Subject: L29-List: Re:
Bob,
I have called and sent multi email to Washington for clarification. No answer. Of course with Randy Babbitt being drunk on the side of the road, it may take awhile. It will count as a BFR.
In which case it will need to be a qualified CFI.
I'll let you know when thy get back to me.
Merry Christmas, happy new year, blue sky's , smooth sailing, following seas & fair winds.
That should cover everyone.
Bill
On Jan 2, 2012, at 2:46 PM, delfin <l29delfin(at)yahoo.com (l29delfin(at)yahoo.com)> wrote:
| Quote: | With the start of the new year I am hoping someone can clarify the new regulation requiring an annual recurrency with an instructor to carry passengers in the jets. What constitutes an instructor that is acceptable. Any instructor that can give dual in the L-29, or a examiner that can give a type rating ? I understand that the ride must be in type also. Can Bill or someone please clarify what exactly needs to take place. Also, does this ride also act as a bi-annual ride? thanks for information
Bob Schwartz
| Quote: |
==========
//www.matronics.com/Navigator?L29-List
==========
cs.com
==========
matronics.com/contribution
==========
|
=nofollow target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?L29-List
|
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
tor?L29-List%22" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?L29-List
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
target="_blank">http://forums.matronics.com
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
bution%22" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
|
href="3D%22http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?L29-List%22">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?L29-List
href="3D%22http://forums.matronics.com%22">http://forums.matronics.com
href="3D%22http://www.matronics.com/contribution%22">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
|
[b]
| | - The Matronics L29-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?L29-List |
|
|
|
Get Email Distribution Too!
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
