Matronics Email Lists :: View topic

Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists

Get Email Distribution Too! FAQ Search Memberlist Usergroups Register

Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in

Overhead Console
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next

Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV10-List

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author Message

aircarepros(at)yahoo.com
Guest

Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 4:21 pm Post subject: Overhead Console

Not to through a wrench in the hype, but if you are wanting air conditioning or even ventilation that far forward in the cabin, the chevy's overhead doesn't lend itself very well to adaptation.  No automotive does however, so its back to custom laid fiberglass and although Tony's price maybe high, it does allow for excellent ventilation in the cabin space and looks very prestigious as it does it.  Other alternatives are in development also and will be out by mid to late Sept.



"John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com> wrote:   [quote]--> RV10-List message posted by: "John W. Cox" 



Hopefully, Tony is monitoring this, cause there are sure a lot available

overhead consoles at a reasonable price. Debbie, your quality was

beyond comment. Beautiful aircraft and I was hurt not to see you  taking

home an award. It's a winner in my book.



Watch S-10 Blazers jump on the stolen auto list as the 10 builders

follow Deems purchase and bypass Ebay.



John Cox



--

armywrights(at)adelphia.n
Guest

Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:00 pm Post subject: Overhead Console

Who needs ebay and a junkyard? I’ll just go rip the one that I already have out of my 97 Silverado…  Oh wait, I don’t really use that one either except for the lights, so maybe everyone needs to rethink just how much pretty storage space they need.  For instance, one of the bays in the console in question is for a garage door opener.  So you might need to plan on installing a hangar door opener that you can open as you taxi in for that super-cool look – it’d beat taxiing in with the canopy open any day!  

   

Rob Wright  

Do not archive  

         

  

From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of JOHN STARN

 Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:22 PM

 To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com

 Subject: Re: Overhead Console  

  

     

Not if the "shoe" fits. Why re-invent the "wheel" ?.....AGAIN.....  

    

A 100K airplane with  .06 cent pop rivets and glue for static source ? ?. BUT that's why it's called an "experimental" aircraft. Build it YOUR way.  

    

Do Not Archive....did not trim as it was a very short post.  

    

KABONG HRII N561FS (GBA & GWB)  

  [quote]    

---

armywrights(at)adelphia.n
Guest

Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:00 pm Post subject: Overhead Console

John, every six months or so you need to re-explain all of your tags at the end of your emails so we can keep up with you.  :]  

   

Rob  

         

  

From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of JOHN STARN

 Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 2:22 PM

 To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com

 Subject: Re: Overhead Console  

  

     

Not if the "shoe" fits. Why re-invent the "wheel" ?.....AGAIN.....  

    

A 100K airplane with  .06 cent pop rivets and glue for static source ? ?. BUT that's why it's called an "experimental" aircraft. Build it YOUR way.  

    

Do Not Archive....did not trim as it was a very short post.  

    

KABONG HRII N561FS (GBA & GWB)  

  [quote]    

---

jhstarn(at)verizon.net
Guest

Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 9:51 pm Post subject: Overhead Console

OK but only 'cause you ask.

  

 KABONG, handle given to me while a Patrol Sgt. on Fontana PD. Broke two0 stocks on my 12 ga. in a month using it more like a baton. Went to a City0 Halloween Party in all black western gear. Guy from Public Works asked: "Who you0 supposed to be ?, QuicksDraw McGraw ?."  One of my rookies spoke up, "NO,0 I've seen him in action, he's El Kabong" (QuicksDraw's  Zorro type0 alter-ego that Kabongs bad guys with a guitar.Very heavy on the KA---BONG0 part) the KABONG handle stuck. 

  

 HRII N561FS: #68 completed & flying Harmon Rocket II. Owner is Tom0 "Gummibear" Gummo, F-4 Wild Weasel pilot, USAF Major Ret. Unit he went to war0 with in the gulf, 561st. Fighter Sq. (N561FS) He supplied the majority of the0 funds, I donated time (five years), blood, sweat and a buck or two here &0 there.

  

 (GBA & GWB): God Bless America and George W. Bush

   

 Do Not Archive     KABONG  (GBA & GWB)

 N561FS is easy to spot on any tarmac. It's a Rocket, done in USAF aggressor0 blue/gray, USAF, Star & Bars with wing & tail tips in yellow. The0 561st. shield on the tail and it's swinging a FOUR bladed MT prop. (But that's0 another interesting but long story)

  

 [quote]   ---

AV8ORJWC

Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 1149
Location: Aurora, Oregon "Home of VANS"

Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 9:00 am Post subject: Overhead Console

John, if I understand the problem which is left undeclared.  It is the volume of air and the flow rate capable under the stock GMC component as mounted to a VANS canopy.  Tony’s allows more volume and flow rate with better static pressure results. Given the poor finish work of the M & T composite cowl, this dilemma can be effected by a primary adapter (builder created) between the VANS composite and the GMC quality looking finish piece.  Now for those who chose not to go with conditioned air, they may already be home free without the intermediary adapter.  Did I miss why people should through their money at Tony.  

   

Just posting what might be a cost effective solution for the budget minded.  

   

John C  

         

  

From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John N. Strain II

 Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 5:16 PM

 To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com

 Subject: RE: Overhead Console  

  

   

Not to through a wrench in the hype, but if you are wanting air conditioning or even ventilation that far forward in the cabin, the chevy's overhead doesn't lend itself very well to adaptation.  No automotive does however, so its back to custom laid fiberglass and although Tony's price maybe high, it does allow for excellent ventilation in the cabin space and looks very prestigious as it does it.  Other alternatives are in development also and will be out by mid to late Sept.

 

 "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com> wrote:   

--> RV10-List message posted by: "John W. Cox" 

 

 Hopefully, Tony is monitoring this, cause there are sure a lot available

 overhead consoles at a reasonable price. Debbie, your quality was

 beyond comment. Beautiful aircraft and I was hurt not to see you taking

 home an award. It's a winner in my book.

 

 Watch S-10 Blazers jump on the stolen auto list as the 10 builders

 follow Deems purchase and bypass Ebay.

 

 John Cox

 

 --

aircarepros(at)yahoo.com
Guest

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:56 am Post subject: Overhead Console

John,  

   

  I missed some of the earlier chat about why the GMC overhead (except for the fact that Jim and Debbie put it in Debbie's plane), so I may have missed something vital.  Those not concerned with conditioned air have absolutely no issue as far as I can tell with the GMC overhead.  All I'm saying is for any affording AC, they will want to maximize its' capability.  The GMC overhead requires significant alteration to be able to be used as a very limited airflow device, as well as will also require so much transitional fiberglass work that it may become less than cost effective.  I am by no means pushing Tony's product as the only option, just a very nice, high priced one.  There will be other overheads with even more effectiveness and much better priced than Tony's coming out very soon (not yet having permission to release the specific details).   The option of someone laying up there own complete panel is still not that expensive (just time consuming) and could provide a more finished look in the cabin than a bolt on component.  

  Then there's my own concerns which are only meant to amuze.  I have a 96 suburban and I don't want to see my insurance rates climbing through the roof because a bunch of RV guys create a new base for the chop shop marketplace. 

   

  Thanks John for clarifying.  I will become better at making myself clear and will never intend to offend without clearly stating so.  Keep on building.

   

  John S.



"John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com> wrote:

  [quote]              John, if I understand the problem which is left undeclared.  It is the volume of air and the flow rate capable under the stock GMC component as mounted to a VANS canopy.  Tony’s allows more volume and flow rate with better static pressure results.  Given the poor finish work of the M & T composite cowl, this dilemma can be effected by a primary adapter (builder created) between the VANS composite and the GMC quality looking finish piece.  Now for those who chose not to go with conditioned air, they may already be home free without the intermediary adapter.  Did I miss why people should through their money at Tony.

   

  Just posting what might be a cost effective solution for the budget minded.

   

  John C

   

        

  From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John N. Strain II

Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 5:16 PM

To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com

Subject: RE: Overhead Console



   

  Not to through a wrench in the hype, but if you are wanting air conditioning or even ventilation that far forward in the cabin, the chevy's overhead doesn't lend itself very well to adaptation.  No automotive does however, so its back to custom laid fiberglass and although Tony's price maybe high, it does allow for excellent ventilation in the cabin space and looks very prestigious as it does it.  Other alternatives are in development also and will be out by mid to late Sept.



"John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com> wrote: 

  --> RV10-List message posted by: "John W. Cox" 



Hopefully, Tony is monitoring this, cause there are sure a lot available

overhead consoles at a reasonable price. Debbie, your quality was

beyond comment. Beautiful aircraft and I was hurt not to see you taking

home an award. It's a winner in my book.



Watch S-10 Blazers jump on the stolen auto list as the 10 builders

follow Deems purchase and bypass Ebay.



John Cox



--

Tdawson(at)avidyne.com
Guest

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:03 am Post subject: Overhead Console

I don’t think any of the Chevy console users or future users intended to use it for ventilation purposes.  Just a nice place for some map lights, switches, sunglasses, and a way to hide/protect the cable connections to your top-mounted TAS antenna.  

   

TDT  

40025  

         

  

From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John N. Strain II

 Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 12:55 PM

 To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com

 Subject: RE: Overhead Console  

  

     

John,    

    

   

    

I missed some of the earlier chat about why the GMC overhead (except for the fact that Jim and Debbie put it in Debbie's plane), so I may have missed something vital.  Those not concerned with conditioned air have absolutely no issue as far as I can tell with the GMC overhead.  All I'm saying is for any affording AC, they will want to maximize its' capability.  The GMC overhead requires significant alteration to be able to be used as a very limited airflow device, as well as will also require so much transitional fiberglass work that it may become less than cost effective.  I am by no means pushing Tony's product as the only option, just a very nice, high priced one.  There will be other overheads with even more effectiveness and much better priced than Tony's coming out very soon (not yet having permission to release the specific details).  The option of someone laying up there own complete panel is still not that expensive (just time consuming) and could provide a more finished look in the cabin than a bolt on component.    

    

Then there's my own concerns which are only meant to amuze.  I have a 96 suburban and I don't want to see my insurance rates climbing through the roof because a bunch of RV guys create a new base for the chop shop marketplace.   

    

   

    

Thanks John for clarifying.  I will become better at making myself clear and will never intend to offend without clearly stating so.  Keep on building.  

    

   

    

John S.

 

 "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com> wrote:  

  [quote]    

John, if I understand the problem which is left undeclared.  It is the volume of air and the flow rate capable under the stock GMC component as mounted to a VANS canopy.  Tony’s allows more volume and flow rate with better static pressure results. Given the poor finish work of the M & T composite cowl, this dilemma can be effected by a primary adapter (builder created) between the VANS composite and the GMC quality looking finish piece.  Now for those who chose not to go with conditioned air, they may already be home free without the intermediary adapter.  Did I miss why people should through their money at Tony.  

    

   

    

Just posting what might be a cost effective solution for the budget minded.  

    

   

    

John C  

    

   

          

  

    

From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John N. Strain II

 Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 5:16 PM

 To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com

 Subject: RE: Overhead Console  

  

    

   

    

Not to through a wrench in the hype, but if you are wanting air conditioning or even ventilation that far forward in the cabin, the chevy's overhead doesn't lend itself very well to adaptation.  No automotive does however, so its back to custom laid fiberglass and although Tony's price maybe high, it does allow for excellent ventilation in the cabin space and looks very prestigious as it does it.  Other alternatives are in development also and will be out by mid to late Sept.

 

 "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com> wrote:   

    

--> RV10-List message posted by: "John W. Cox" 

 

 Hopefully, Tony is monitoring this, cause there are sure a lot available

 overhead consoles at a reasonable price. Debbie, your quality was

 beyond comment. Beautiful aircraft and I was hurt not to see you taking

 home an award. It's a winner in my book.

 

 Watch S-10 Blazers jump on the stolen auto list as the 10 builders

 follow Deems purchase and bypass Ebay.

 

 John Cox

 

 --

rvbuilder(at)sausen.net
Guest

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:58 am Post subject: Overhead Console

That’s correct.  I see no easy way to adapt the S-10 console into a fresh air supply.  It is simply for the flood lights and storage with maybe a couple indicator lights or switches.  

     

Michael Sausen  

RV-10 #352 Buildus Interuptus due to moving  

Do Not Archive  

Recent RV-10 Build Activity  

  

       

From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Dawson-Townsend

 Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 12:03 PM

 To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com

 Subject: RE: Overhead Console  

  

  

   

I don’t think any of the Chevy console users or future users intended to use it for ventilation purposes.  Just a nice place for some map lights, switches, sunglasses, and a way to hide/protect the cable connections to your top-mounted TAS antenna.  

   

TDT  

40025  

         

  

From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John N. Strain II

 Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 12:55 PM

 To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com

 Subject: RE: Overhead Console  

  

     

John,    

    

   

    

I missed some of the earlier chat about why the GMC overhead (except for the fact that Jim and Debbie put it in Debbie's plane), so I may have missed something vital.  Those not concerned with conditioned air have absolutely no issue as far as I can tell with the GMC overhead.  All I'm saying is for any affording AC, they will want to maximize its' capability.  The GMC overhead requires significant alteration to be able to be used as a very limited airflow device, as well as will also require so much transitional fiberglass work that it may become less than cost effective.  I am by no means pushing Tony's product as the only option, just a very nice, high priced one.  There will be other overheads with even more effectiveness and much better priced than Tony's coming out very soon (not yet having permission to release the specific details).  The option of someone laying up there own complete panel is still not that expensive (just time consuming) and could provide a more finished look in the cabin than a bolt on component.    

    

Then there's my own concerns which are only meant to amuze.  I have a 96 suburban and I don't want to see my insurance rates climbing through the roof because a bunch of RV guys create a new base for the chop shop marketplace.   

    

   

    

Thanks John for clarifying.  I will become better at making myself clear and will never intend to offend without clearly stating so.  Keep on building.  

    

   

    

John S.

 

 "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com (johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com)> wrote:  

  [quote]    

John, if I understand the problem which is left undeclared.  It is the volume of air and the flow rate capable under the stock GMC component as mounted to a VANS canopy.  Tony’s allows more volume and flow rate with better static pressure results. Given the poor finish work of the M & T composite cowl, this dilemma can be effected by a primary adapter (builder created) between the VANS composite and the GMC quality looking finish piece.  Now for those who chose not to go with conditioned air, they may already be home free without the intermediary adapter.  Did I miss why people should through their money at Tony.  

    

   

    

Just posting what might be a cost effective solution for the budget minded.  

    

   

    

John C  

    

   

          

  

    

From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John N. Strain II

 Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 5:16 PM

 To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com

 Subject: RE: Overhead Console  

  

    

   

    

Not to through a wrench in the hype, but if you are wanting air conditioning or even ventilation that far forward in the cabin, the chevy's overhead doesn't lend itself very well to adaptation.  No automotive does however, so its back to custom laid fiberglass and although Tony's price maybe high, it does allow for excellent ventilation in the cabin space and looks very prestigious as it does it.  Other alternatives are in development also and will be out by mid to late Sept.

 

 "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com (johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com)> wrote:   

    

--> RV10-List message posted by: "John W. Cox" 

 

 Hopefully, Tony is monitoring this, cause there are sure a lot available

 overhead consoles at a reasonable price. Debbie, your quality was

 beyond comment. Beautiful aircraft and I was hurt not to see you taking

 home an award. It's a winner in my book.

 

 Watch S-10 Blazers jump on the stolen auto list as the 10 builders

 follow Deems purchase and bypass Ebay.

 

 John Cox

 

 --

rleffler(at)rrohio.com
Guest

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:17 am Post subject: Overhead Console

As a newbie on the list, not knowing "Tony", can somebody point me to where I can learn  more about his console and products.



thanks,



bob



[quote] 

 From: "John N. Strain II" <aircarepros(at)yahoo.com>

 Date: 2006/08/07 Mon PM 12:55:15 EDT

 To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com

 Subject: RE: Overhead Console

 

 John,  

    

   I missed some of the earlier chat about why the GMC overhead (except for the fact that Jim and Debbie put it in Debbie's plane), so I may have missed something vital.  Those not concerned with conditioned air have absolutely no issue as far as I can tell with the GMC overhead.  All I'm saying is for any affording AC, they will want to maximize its' capability.  The GMC overhead requires significant alteration to be able to be used as a very limited airflow device, as well as will also require so much transitional fiberglass work that it may become less than cost effective.  I am by no means pushing Tony's product as the only option, just a very nice, high priced one.  There will be other overheads with even more effectiveness and much better priced than Tony's coming out very soon (not yet having permission to release the specific details).  The option of someone laying up there own complete panel is still not that expensive (just time consuming) and could provide a more

  finished look in the cabin than a bolt on component.  

   Then there's my own concerns which are only meant to amuze.  I have a 96 suburban and I don't want to see my insurance rates climbing through the roof because a bunch of RV guys create a new base for the chop shop marketplace. 

    

   Thanks John for clarifying.  I will become better at making myself clear and will never intend to offend without clearly stating so.  Keep on building.

    

   John S.

 

 "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com> wrote:

                 John, if I understand the problem which is left undeclared.  It is the volume of air and the flow rate capable under the stock GMC component as mounted to a VANS canopy.  Tony’s allows more volume and flow rate with better static pressure results. Given the poor finish work of the M & T composite cowl, this dilemma can be effected by a primary adapter (builder created) between the VANS composite and the GMC quality looking finish piece.  Now for those who chose not to go with conditioned air, they may already be home free without the intermediary adapter.  Did I miss why people should through their money at Tony.

    

   Just posting what might be a cost effective solution for the budget minded.

    

   John C

    

       

 ---------------------------------

   

   From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of John N. Strain II

 Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 5:16 PM

 To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com

 Subject: RE: Overhead Console

 

    

   Not to through a wrench in the hype, but if you are wanting air conditioning or even ventilation that far forward in the cabin, the chevy's overhead doesn't lend itself very well to adaptation.  No automotive does however, so its back to custom laid fiberglass and although Tony's price maybe high, it does allow for excellent ventilation in the cabin space and looks very prestigious as it does it.  Other alternatives are in development also and will be out by mid to late Sept.

 

 "John W. Cox" <johnwcox(at)pacificnw.com> wrote: 

   

 

 Hopefully, Tony is monitoring this, cause there are sure a lot available

 overhead consoles at a reasonable price. Debbie, your quality was

 beyond comment. Beautiful aircraft and I was hurt not to see you taking

 home an award. It's a winner in my book.

 

 Watch S-10 Blazers jump on the stolen auto list as the 10 builders

 follow Deems purchase and bypass Ebay.

 

 John Cox

 

 --

Rick S.

Joined: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 347
Location: Las Vegas

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:43 pm Post subject: Overhead Console

www.accuracyavionics.com



Still under construction but his contact info is there.



Rick S.

40185



do not archive

_________________
Rick S.
RV-10
40185

GenGrumpy(at)aol.com
Guest

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:29 pm Post subject: Overhead Console

I disagree.

  

 I have installed Tony's console, and it is a nice addition.

  

 I do not like Tony's vent for the base of the vertical tail, so we are0looking at 2 options:

  

 1. A NACA vent mounted on the fuselage, probably on the right side forward of the horizontal tail.  That appears to be where most positive pressure is with least threat of exhaust swirl.

  

 OR

  

 2. Find or fab a retractable vent (like old Bonanzas, etc had) that we0can mount on upper part of fuselage in front of the vertical tail.

  

 Grumpy

 #40404, panel in and working!

  

 In a message dated 8/7/2006 1:04:37 PM Central Standard Time, rvbuilder(at)sausen.net writes:

  	  Quote: 	
		   

Thatâ€™s correct.  I see no easy way to adapt the S-10 console into a fresh air supply.  It is simply for0the flood lights and storage with maybe a couple indicator lights or switches. 

   

Michael Sausen 

RV-10 #352 Buildus Interuptus due to moving 

Do Not Archive 

Recent RV-10 Build Activity

 

    

From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Dawson-Townsend

Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 12:03 PM

To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com

Subject: RE: Overhead Console



 

  

I donâ€™t think any of the Chevy console users or future users intended to use it for ventilation purposes.  Just a0nice place for some map lights, switches, sunglasses, and a way to hide/protect the cable connections to your top-mounted TAS antenna. 

  

TDT 

40025

gorejr(at)bellsouth.net
Guest

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:54 pm Post subject: Overhead Console

Does anybody have pics of what we are talking about?  Thanks  Jim

 	  Quote: 	

 From: GenGrumpy(at)aol.com

 Date: 2006/08/07 Mon PM 08:28:59 EDT

 To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com

 Subject: Re: Overhead Console

 I disagree.

 I have installed Tony's console, and it is a nice addition.

 I do not like Tony's vent for the base of the vertical tail, so we are 

 looking at 2 options:

 1. A NACA vent mounted on the fuselage, probably on the right side forward of 

 the horizontal tail.  That appears to be where most positive pressure is with 

 least threat of exhaust swirl.

 OR

 2. Find or fab a retractable vent (like old Bonanzas, etc had) that we can 

 mount on upper part of fuselage in front of the vertical tail.

 Grumpy

 #40404, panel in and working!

 In a message dated 8/7/2006 1:04:37 PM Central Standard Time, 

 rvbuilder(at)sausen.net writes:

 That?s correct.  I see no easy way to adapt the S-10 console into a fresh air 

 supply.  It is simply for the flood lights and storage with maybe a couple 

 indicator lights or switches.

 Michael Sausen

 RV-10 #352 Buildus Interuptus due to moving

 Do Not Archive

 Recent RV-10 Build Activity

 From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com 

 [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tim Dawson-Townsend

 Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 12:03 PM

 To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com

 Subject: RE: Overhead Console

 I don?t think any of the Chevy console users or future users intended to use 

 it for ventilation purposes.  Just a nice place for some map lights, switches, 

 sunglasses, and a way to hide/protect the cable connections to your 

 top-mounted TAS antenna.

 TDT

 40025

jesse(at)itecusa.org
Guest

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 6:46 pm Post subject: Overhead Console

Does anybody have any good detailed pictures of what Debbie did with her

door seals?



Do not archive.



Jesse Saint

I-TEC, Inc.

jesse(at)itecusa.org

www.itecusa.org

W: 352-465-4545

C: 352-427-0285

--

Deems Davis

Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 925

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 7:29 pm Post subject: Overhead Console

Here's a couple of pics.



http://deemsrv10.com/album/OSHKOSH%202006/slides/DSC03085.html



I recall listening to Jim Erskin talking to Mike Sausen, Jim said he 

paid $85 for the door seal, but I didn't catch where he got it. Mike do 

you recall?



Deems Davis # 406

Fuse/Finishing/Panel

http://deemsrv10.com/



Jesse Saint wrote:



[quote]



Does anybody have any good detailed pictures of what Debbie did with her

door seals?



Do not archive.



Jesse Saint

I-TEC, Inc.

jesse(at)itecusa.org

www.itecusa.org

W: 352-465-4545

C: 352-427-0285

--

Rick S.

Joined: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 347
Location: Las Vegas

Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:21 pm Post subject: Overhead Console

Hey look!!!! It's Deems sucked up tight geting a look at the back inside!!!!

Rick S.

40185



do not archive

_________________
Rick S.
RV-10
40185

rvbuilder(at)sausen.net
Guest

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 4:47 am Post subject: Overhead Console

It was something new that basically held it's form after a few uses.  I

believe Alex D was going to start selling it



Michael Sausen

RV-10 #352 Buildus Interuptus due to moving

--

Tim(at)MyRV10.com
Guest

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 5:21 am Post subject: Overhead Console

I see you've already got pics via the list of the GM console.

Here are some old ones on the ventilation console.  I have more

that I'll be posting hopefully soon.  I'm still catching up.



http://www.myrv10.com/tips/accessories/overhead_console/index.html



Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying

do not archive

gorejr(at)bellsouth.net wrote:

 	  Quote: 	
		   

 

 Does anybody have pics of what we are talking about?  Thanks  Jim

> From: GenGrumpy(at)aol.com

wcurtis(at)core.com
Guest

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 6:52 am Post subject: Overhead Console

http://aircraftdoorseals.com

[quote]--> RV10-List message posted by: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net (deemsdavis(at)cox.net)>>Here's a couple of pics.>>http://deemsrv10.com/album/OSHKOSH%202006/slides/DSC03085.html>>I recall listening to Jim Erskin talking to Mike Sausen, Jim said he >paid $85 for the door seal, but I didn't catch where he got it. Mike do >you recall?>>Deems Davis # 406>Fuse/Finishing/Panel>http://deemsrv10.com/>>Jesse Saint wrote:>>--> RV10-List message posted by: "Jesse Saint" <jesse(at)itecusa.org (jesse(at)itecusa.org)>>>>>Does anybody have any good detailed pictures of what Debbie did with her>>door seals?> William Curtis http://nerv10.com/

Tdawson(at)avidyne.com
Guest

Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 7:01 am Post subject: Overhead Console

How much?  Website says “call for quote” . . .  

   

TDT

 

   

         

  

From: owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-rv10-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of W. Curtis

 Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 10:52 AM

 To: RV10-List(at)matronics.com

 Subject: Re: Overhead Console  

  

   

http://aircraftdoorseals.com  



 >--> RV10-List message posted by: Deems Davis <deemsdavis(at)cox.net (deemsdavis(at)cox.net)>

 >Here's a couple of pics.

 >

 >http://deemsrv10.com/album/OSHKOSH%202006/slides/DSC03085.html

 >

 >I recall listening to Jim Erskin talking to Mike Sausen, Jim said he 

 >paid $85 for the door seal, but I didn't catch where he got it. Mike do 

 >you recall?

 >

 >Deems Davis # 406

 >Fuse/Finishing/Panel

 >http://deemsrv10.com/

 >

 >Jesse Saint wrote:

 >>--> RV10-List message posted by: "Jesse Saint" <jesse(at)itecusa.org (jesse(at)itecusa.org)>

 >>

 >>Does anybody have any good detailed pictures of what Debbie did with her

 >>door seals?

 >  



 William Curtis

 http://nerv10.com/

jss165(at)yahoo.com
Guest

Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 8:07 pm Post subject: Overhead Console

Another good place to find auto salvage parts is 

www.car-part.com This is a searchable database of

salvage parts for just about any automobile you can

think of.



__________________________________________________

Display posts from previous:

	Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV10-List	All times are GMT - 8 Hours Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next
Page 2 of 3

Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum