Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Engine Through-Stud Sheer...
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Commander-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
brcamp(at)windows.microso
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:01 am    Post subject: Engine Through-Stud Sheer... Reply with quote

FAA doesn’t allow field approvals for engines.
One the other hand, an STC should be a piece of cake if one could find a candidate (victim) aircraft to do the flight testing.

BTW, Bob, I wonder if anyone could get Beryl DeShannon’s assistance in providing the engineering data, since they’ve already got it for upgrading Barons and Bananas? That would make the issue largely a paper chase.

Bruce

From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of W J R HAMILTON
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 2:38 AM
To: commander-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Engine Through-Stud Sheer...



Folks,
Is an STC really necessary, has anybody explored a field upgrade.
I say this, because several upgrades with which I have been involved in Australian (not AC) have been done on our (near) equivalent of a 377 field approval system, with the appropriate CAR 35 (DER) input.
As a simplification, it is assumed that the extra power will be a "bonus", there was no attempt to re-certify any increased performance.
This has avoided the need to re-determine Vmc figures etc., if the upgrade is a twin.
I know it all sound a bit rough and ready, but there is little involved in putting the IO-520 in the 500A, I doubt that the IO-550 is much more of a bother, with a co-operative FAA man.
Needless to say, one would be wise to have some carefully established "informal guidelines", if in fact you just happened to be "inadvertently" taking advantage of the additional HP, and one quit. Fortunately the wonderful engine out handling of Aero Commanders in general make this somewhat less fraught than some other manufacturer's products that started with IO-470, but have acquired IO-520 along the way.
Cheers,
Bill Hamilton




At 03:24 AM 15/08/2007, you wrote:


Good idea about the 550... A guy in the hangar here has a Bonanza with one and he loves it... I guess put out a call for all 12 of the existing 500A owners left to see what interest might be shown Wink




David Owens
Aerial Viewpoint
N14AV
AC-500A-Colemill
Quote:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List
0
Quote:
1
Quote:
2
Quote:
3
Quote:
4
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Commander-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List
Back to top
yourtcfg(at)aol.com
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:27 am    Post subject: Engine Through-Stud Sheer... Reply with quote

There is no way to really know what happened. I don't believe that Continental requires that the thru bolts be changed at O/H (they should be). Event though this is the first cyl to be remove after this O/H, that stud could easily have been torqued a dozen times in it's service life. These engines are known for cyl failures. So, I would strongly suggest that you replace both thru bolts at that station. Good luck jb


--


- The Matronics Commander-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List
Back to top
brcamp(at)windows.microso
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:50 am    Post subject: Engine Through-Stud Sheer... Reply with quote

This is a turbocharged engine, yes?

Many a twin engine pilot’s hanger story start with the words “I knew I had an engine problem when I saw the cylinder go through the cowling”. Not much comfort, but I suppose it could have been worse.

  Bruce

From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of yourtcfg(at)aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 9:27 AM
To: commander-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Engine Through-Stud Sheer...


There is no way to really know what happened. I don't believe that Continental requires that the thru bolts be changed at O/H (they should be). Event though this is the first cyl to be remove after this O/H, that stud could easily have been torqued a dozen times in it's service life. These engines are known for cyl failures. So, I would strongly suggest that you replace both thru bolts at that station. Good luck jb


--


- The Matronics Commander-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List
Back to top
rsrandazzo(at)precisionma
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 11:11 am    Post subject: Engine Through-Stud Sheer... Reply with quote

Bruce

That happened to me two years ago... Same story opener...

Robert S. RandazzoPrecision Manuals Development Group
http://www.precisionmanuals.com
On Aug 15, 2007, at 9:48 AM, Bruce Campbell <brcamp(at)windows.microsoft.com (brcamp(at)windows.microsoft.com)> wrote:

[quote]
This is a turbocharged engine, yes?

Many a twin engine pilot’s hanger story start with the words “I knew I had an engine problem when I saw the cylinder go through the cowling”. Not much comfort, but I suppose it could have been worse.

  Bruce

From: owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com) [mailto:owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-commander-list-server(at)matronics.com)] On Behalf Of yourtcfg(at)aol.com (yourtcfg(at)aol.com)
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 9:27 AM
To: commander-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Engine Through-Stud Sheer...


There is no way to really know what happened. I don't believe that Continental requires that the thru bolts be changed at O/H (they should be). Event though this is the first cyl to be remove after this O/H, that stud could easily have been torqued a dozen times in it's service life. These engines are known for cyl failures. So, I would strongly suggest that you replace both thru bolts at that station. Good luck jb


--


- The Matronics Commander-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List
Back to top
wjrhamilton(at)optusnet.c
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 2:02 am    Post subject: Engine Through-Stud Sheer... Reply with quote

Folks,
Is an STC really necessary, has anybody explored a field upgrade.
I say this, because several upgrades with which I have been involved in Australian (not AC) have been done on our (near) equivalent of a 377 field approval system, with the appropriate CAR 35 (DER) input.
As a simplification, it is assumed that the extra power will be a "bonus", there was no attempt to re-certify any increased performance.
This has avoided the need to re-determine Vmc figures etc., if the upgrade is a twin.
I know it all sound a bit rough and ready, but there is little involved in putting the IO-520 in the 500A, I doubt that the IO-550 is much more of a bother, with a co-operative FAA man.
Needless to say, one would be wise to have some carefully established "informal guidelines", if in fact you just happened to be "inadvertently" taking advantage of the additional HP, and one quit. Fortunately the wonderful engine out handling of Aero Commanders in general make this somewhat less fraught than some other manufacturer's products that started with IO-470, but have acquired IO-520 along the way.
Cheers,
Bill Hamilton




At 03:24 AM 15/08/2007, you wrote:
[quote] Good idea about the 550... A guy in the hangar here has a Bonanza with one and he loves it... I guess put out a call for all 12 of the existing 500A owners left to see what interest might be shown Wink




David Owens
Aerial Viewpoint
N14AV
AC-500A-Colemill
[b]


- The Matronics Commander-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Commander-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group