pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 11:07 am    Post subject: pumps | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Hi,
  My ex flying  partner still flies a Eurostar, the same type we shared but not the same  machine. He is a good pilot and meticulous about maintenance. I forwarded   our recent posts about pumps to him and this is his reply.
  For what its  worth.
   
  On another  tack John flew me to a local airshow last weekend where we had a flyover of the  only two Lancasters still flying.The Canadian one is over her for a month. A  once in a lifetime experience
  Cheers
   
  Pat 
   
 
   
 
   Pat,
   
  Don't know whether you are inclined to forward this to your Kolb  list?
   
  As you may know, mine - a 4 year old example - was one of the series of  Rotax 912s recommended for a change of fuel pump.  Apparently, several of  the previous type had failed in service. A replacement was provided free by the  then UK Rotax agent and it certainly looked a better-engineered piece of work  than its predecessor.  That said, the previous one had given me no trouble  over 4 years and 300 hours.  Nor had the one on a previous Rotax-powered  aircraft I had owned over 6 years and 650 hours.
   
  Experience with the new pump belied appearance.  I try to stay safe by  being attentive to anything about the aircraft which changes - sight, sound or  feel - and investigating.  The new fuel pump showed big and seemingly  random variations in pressure, between 0.2 and 0.4 bar.  (The previous pump  had given virtually constant readings under all conditions.)  It therefore  didn't feel "safe".
   
  Matters came to a head when flying over one of the more inhospitable areas  of the UK, when the pressure dropped off from its "norm" at just over 0.3 bar to  0.2 bar before recovering several sweaty minutes later.
   
  I raised this with the Rotax agent and with our Light Aircraft Association.  The answer was that nothing could be done about it.  The new pumps did give  variations in pressure and my results were within the specified range.  I  subsequently borrowed a new-type pump from elsewhere and this gave better  results, although still subject to some variation.  I have since returned  that to its rightful owners and purchased a further new pump.  This also  gives better results, but still subject to some variation.  I may be  deluding myself but I think the variability may be diminishing with time.   It appears, from talking to others, that the new type fuel pump is just not  engineered to very tight tolerances: strange given the strong engineering  tradition of where in Europe I assume it comes from.
   
  Not being an engineer or an expert, I cannot advise on what your colleague  Dennis Kirby should do!  I just add my tale to the request for  thoughts.
   
  Regards,
   
  John
   
 
    [quote][b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  |