  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		Jim Baker
 
 
  Joined: 30 Mar 2006 Posts: 181 Location: Sayre, PA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2006 4:55 pm    Post subject: Transponder replacement..... | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Just wondering if anyone had any comments concerning the 
 following issue with Narco transponder units..
 
 http://www.gtwn.net/~keith.peshak/NarcoProblems.htm
 
 My old AT-50A  is complaining and was looking for a direct 
 replacement without re-wiring...til I saw this article. Like to have 
 a 165 but now I'm not so sure....
 
 Thanks.
 
 Jim Baker
 580.788.2779
 Elmore City, OK
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Bill Denton
 
 
  Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 97 Location: Chicago, IL USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 5:28 am    Post subject: Transponder replacement..... | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I dunno, but I always tend to be suspicious of people trying to sell me
 something by bitching about something somebody else is selling...
 
 --
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		europa flugzeug fabrik
 
 
  Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Posts: 65 Location: North Coast, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 3:33 pm    Post subject: Re: Transponder replacement..... | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				
 I’ve had no problems with my AT-165.  If Narco says their transponders work, as they must, and they pass the biennial check, we can use them.  Keith Peshak doesn’t make the rules, and he’s been raging about the “P4 problem” for years to no apparent avail.  FAA ignores.
 
 I had an AT-150 covered by the AD (apparent P4 problem), but never did it.  ATC never said anything.  Perhaps a problem in isolated instances (re TCAS, I think).
 
 Fred F.
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		brucebell74(at)sbcglobal. Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2006 4:17 pm    Post subject: Transponder replacement..... | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I just sent my AT165 back because it did not transmit. You would think that 
 the quality control people at NARCO would get on this problem. I switch the 
 AT150 from my old A35 Bonanza to my new RV-4 for test flights. Let you know 
 when I get the AT165 back from NARCO.
 Bruce Bell
 Lubbock, Texas
 RV-4 N23BB (Flying!)
 
 DO NOT ARCHIVE
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		brian
 
  
  Joined: 02 Jan 2006 Posts: 643 Location: Sacramento, California, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 6:01 am    Post subject: Transponder replacement..... | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				On Aug 11, 2006, at 7:33 PM, europa flugzeug fabrik wrote:
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   
  <n3eu(at)comcast.net>
  Jim Baker wrote:
 > Just wondering if anyone had any comments concerning the
 > following issue with Narco transponder units..
 >
 > http://www.gtwn.net/~keith.peshak/NarcoProblems.htm
 
  Ive had no problems with my AT-165.  If Narco says their  
  transponders work, as they must, and they pass the biennial check,  
  we can use them.  Keith Peshak doesnt make the rules, and hes  
  been raging about the P4 problem for years to no apparent avail.   
  FAA ignores.
 
  I had an AT-150 covered by the AD (apparent P4 problem), but never  
  did it.  ATC never said anything.  Perhaps a problem in isolated  
  instances (re TCAS, I think).
 
 | 	  
 I have had problems with transponder/RADAR compatibility with a  
 couple of different transponders, all of which checked out OK on the  
 bench (with one exception). The problems do exist and it is possible  
 that a transponder that checks good on the bench will not work  
 properly with some ATC RADARs. I even received a pink-slip from the  
 FAA grounding my aircraft until the transponder was repaired. The  
 funny thing was, it worked fine with Sacramento, "failed" with  
 Stockton, and then worked fine again when I crossed into Bay  
 Approach's airspace. (One flight, all within the space of 15  
 minutes.) Still, I had to pay a shop to recertify my transponder and  
 then send the paperwork to the FAA before I could fly again. Funny  
 thing, the shop found the transponder to be working perfectly.
 
 FWIW, I have had problems with the Terra transponder (no longer made)  
 and the Garmin GTX-320. The 320 was especially troublesome with  
 obvious engineering deficiencies in that it was almost impossible to  
 tune it accurately and get it to stay on frequency. The most reliable  
 transponder I have ever used is the King KT-76A. Right now I have  
 Apollo SL-70 transponders in my aircraft and they seem to be quite  
 reliable although I don't have the same number of years of experience  
 I have had with the KT-76A.
 
 Brian Lloyd                         361 Catterline Way
 brian-yak AT lloyd DOT com          Folsom, CA 95630
 +1.916.367.2131 (voice)             +1.270.912.0788 (fax)
 
 I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things . . .
  Antoine de Saint-Exupry
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ Brian Lloyd 
 
brian-yak at lloyd dot com
 
+1.916.367.2131 (voice)             +1.270.912.0788 (fax)
 
 
I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things . . .
 
- Antoine de Saint-Exupery | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		europa flugzeug fabrik
 
 
  Joined: 13 Feb 2006 Posts: 65 Location: North Coast, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:33 pm    Post subject: Re: Transponder replacement..... | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | brian wrote: | 	 		  I have had problems with transponder/RADAR compatibility with a couple of different transponders, all of which checked out OK on the bench (with one exception). The problems do exist and it is possible that a transponder that checks good on the bench will not work  
 properly with some ATC RADARs....FWIW, I have had problems with the Terra transponder (no longer made). | 	  
 Going from memory here, as Mr. Peshak’s writings are too hard to follow to read again and to avoid accusation of slander, but he makes interesting allegations.  One is that hardly any transponder meets the TSO, because if they did, ATC systems wouldn’t work, post-TCAS apparently.  How FAA issues a very detailed TSO and then privately and contrarily tells King, Collins, RCA, Narco, etc., he doesn’t say, but apparently re the "P4 pulse" potentially indistinguishable from noise to suppress a reply.  Perhaps guidance inserted as planned with each mfr inside a Wash Post and left on a park bench near FAA (at) 800 Independence Ave. SW?  
 
 Now he says only the Terra does actually comply with the TSO, but consequently breaks ATC interrogator/software systems.  So FAA couldn’t legally insist on an AD for Terra to fix, so FAA then installed a software ”Terra patch.”  Allegedly also an occasional interrogator sweep to detect any Terra’s squawking out there.  Okey dokey...I guess.
 
 Fred F.
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		brian
 
  
  Joined: 02 Jan 2006 Posts: 643 Location: Sacramento, California, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 8:35 am    Post subject: Transponder replacement..... | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				On Aug 12, 2006, at 8:33 PM, europa flugzeug fabrik wrote:
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   Going from memory here, as Mr. Peshaks writings are too hard to  
  follow to read again and to avoid accusation of slander, but he  
  makes interesting allegations.  One is that hardly any transponder  
  meets the TSO, because if they did, ATC systems wouldnt work, post- 
  TCAS apparently.  How FAA issues a very detailed TSO and then  
  privately and contrarily tells King, Collins, RCA, Narco, etc., he  
  doesnt say, but apparently re the "P4 pulse" potentially  
  indistinguishable from noise to suppress a reply.  Perhaps guidance  
  inserted as planned with each mfr inside a Wash Post and left on a  
  park bench near FAA (at) 800 Independence Ave. SW?
 
  Now he says only the Terra does actually comply with the TSO, but  
  consequently breaks ATC interrogator/software systems.  So FAA  
  couldnt legally insist on an AD for Terra to fix, so FAA then  
  installed a software Terra patch.  Allegedly also an occasional  
  interrogator sweep to detect any Terras squawking out there.  Okey  
  dokey...I guess.
 
 | 	  
 The key point is that you have a technical spec for transponders and  
 then you have manufacturers who build to the spec and their stuff  
 doesn't work. They fiddle with the design until their transponders  
 deviate from the spec but actually work and ship them that way. Makes  
 sense to me.
 
 So, it doesn't matter what the spec is, the equipment has to work.  
 That is all that matters.
 
 Brian Lloyd                         361 Catterline Way
 brian-yak AT lloyd DOT com          Folsom, CA 95630
 +1.916.367.2131 (voice)             +1.270.912.0788 (fax)
 
 I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things . . .
  Antoine de Saint-Exupry
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ Brian Lloyd 
 
brian-yak at lloyd dot com
 
+1.916.367.2131 (voice)             +1.270.912.0788 (fax)
 
 
I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things . . .
 
- Antoine de Saint-Exupery | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |