 |
Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mark.bitterlich(at)navy.m
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:47 pm Post subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: First time buyer of a Yak 52 or Nanc |
 |
|
| Quote: | Mark, sir you have to come sit in my CJ.
|
I'd love to!
| Quote: | I'm tall in the body as my legs are only 34 inseam and when sitting at a table with other pilots, I'm usually looking over most folks head.
|
Well then yes! You are like me. I also have a 34 inseam, torso is 44 1/2 inches. 6'6 1/2"
| Quote: | That said, you may be right for what you sat in or the parachute in the seat.
|
You're right, it could have easily been seat adjustments.
| Quote: | I'm just wondering if the seat was truly down all the way, it has 3 settings.
|
Again...... I'm thinking you must be right.
| Quote: | I've also had people question my ability to sit in a Yak-52 or 52TW and I have to remind them I owned a 52, I swept the yak award records at the first Manitowoc gathering. 
|
I can't fly a 52 .. simply too big, but ya know... I have a lot of BULK too. Nice way of saying Lard Ass.
Mark
[quote] On Dec 29, 2015, at 14:01, Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD <mark.bitterlich(at)navy.mil> wrote:
--> <mark.bitterlich(at)navy.mil>
Roger that Bear... I guess it depends on the size of the human really. I know you are tall, but I believe most of your height is in your legs, mine is in the torso.
Sat in them both. 52 had more headroom for me. With the special canopy, I am sure you are correct! You know more about CJ's than most folks around.
Actually there is more room in my 50 than a 52... truly. That said, I also moved the 50 seat back a few inches and tilted it a tad to make it even better.
I'm up for being told what really makes a "better formation" aircraft. I think it has a lot to do with personal perspectives really. You put a MTV9-250/260 prop on just about anything, and you have an instant air brake with makes formation somewhat easier. I have flown the 50 formation IFR in the goo counting rivets, and other than a Suke, I think it is the best at every darn thing, formation included, it just doesn't have the legs.
Take care,
Mark
--
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jblake207(at)comcast.net
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 1:08 pm Post subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: First time buyer of a Yak 52 or Nanc |
|
|
I've got a few hours in a T-34A while at the Travis AFB Aeroclub (flew it under the bridge once) and a few hours in the T-34C at Fort Bragg. Clearly the turbine C was Way Mo better, faster, etc than the A model. I'd have to say that the CJ is somewhere between the T-34A and C... holds energy longer than the A, but isn't as responsive as the C. The CJ will out G both. Love the T-34; however, with about 1000 hours now in the CJ and I wouldn't trade it for either the A or C model T34... now I might trade for that Champ Pappy mentioned just to recapture my 16th birthday and get away from the annual medicals. Plus, I could land that Champ on the local nude beach... but at this point in life, the landing would be exciting.
Happy New Year my round motor brethren.
JB
From: "DaBear" <dabear(at)damned.org>
To: yak-list(at)matronics.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 2:30:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: First time buyer of a Yak 52 or Nanchang CJ-6
--> Yak-List message posted by: DaBear <dabear(at)damned.org>
Mark, sir you have to come sit in my CJ. I'm tall in the body as my legs are only 34 inseam and when sitting at a table with other pilots, I'm usually looking over most folks head. That said, you may be right for what you sat in or the parachute in the seat. I'm just wondering if the seat was truly down all the way, it has 3 settings.
I've also had people question my ability to sit in a Yak-52 or 52TW and I have to remind them I owned a 52, I swept the yak award records at the first Manitowoc gathering.
Randy DeVere
[quote] On Dec 29, 2015, at 14:01, Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD <mark.bitterlich(at)navy.mil> wrote:
--> Yak-List message posted by: "Bitterlich, Mark G CIV NAVAIR, WD" <mark.bitterlich(at)navy.mil>
Roger that Bear... I guess it depends on the size of the human really. I know you are tall, but I believe most of your height is in your legs, mine is in the torso.
Sat in them both. 52 had more headroom for me. With the special canopy, I am sure you are correct! You know more about CJ's than most folks around.
Actually there is more room in my 50 than a 52... truly. That said, I also moved the 50 seat back a few inches and tilted it a tad to make it even better.
I'm up for being told what really makes a "better formation" aircraft. I think it has a lot to do with personal perspectives really. You put a MTV9-250/260 prop on just about anything, and you have an instant air brake with makes formation somewhat easier. I have flown the 50 formation IFR in the goo counting rivets, and other than a Suke, I think it is the best at every darn thing, formation included, it just doesn't have the legs.
Take care,
Mark
--
| | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
Get Email Distribution Too!
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
