Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Performance Comparison

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV10-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jim(at)CombsFive.Com
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:05 pm    Post subject: Performance Comparison Reply with quote

Regarding the comparison to other aircraft:

Here is a performance comparison someone put together a long time ago. I have the original power point and would add to it if someone has the specific data points for other aircraft of interest. (Bonanza, etc).

I don't know who did this originally, but I did keep a copy.

The points used:

Price, wingspan, length, wing area, empty weight, gross weight, useful load, useful load - full fuel, wing loading, power loading, engine horsepower, fuel capacity, cruise speed, takeoff performance, landing performance, range, climb rate.

Jim Combs
N312F (40192)


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List



perf_cmp.pdf
 Description:

Download
 Filename:  perf_cmp.pdf
 Filesize:  64.22 KB
 Downloaded:  117 Time(s)

Back to top
jhstarn(at)verizon.net
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:18 pm    Post subject: Performance Comparison Reply with quote

AWW..ya forgot the TBM. Carries 6 people, 1000 mile range at better then
300MPH (more than that if they have removed the armor plating & the "Fish")
Short field & climbs out are smartly. Can carry a ton and is fully aerobatic
too. (for a bomber).
KABONG Do Not Archive BUT I agree the RV-10 is the pick of the litter in
it's class. 8*)

---


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
jim(at)CombsFive.Com
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:15 am    Post subject: Performance Comparison Reply with quote

But it takes 60 gallons of fuel just to start it up and taxi to the runway! (Grin!)

Do Not Archive!

============================================================
From: "JOHN STARN" <jhstarn(at)verizon.net>
Date: 2007/03/13 Tue PM 10:17:57 EST
To: <rv10-list(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Re: Performance Comparison



AWW..ya forgot the TBM. Carries 6 people, 1000 mile range at better then
300MPH (more than that if they have removed the armor plating & the "Fish")
Short field & climbs out are smartly. Can carry a ton and is fully aerobatic
too. (for a bomber).
KABONG Do Not Archive BUT I agree the RV-10 is the pick of the litter in
it's class. 8*)

---


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
jesse(at)saintaviation.co
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 5:19 am    Post subject: Performance Comparison Reply with quote

I have also compiled a comparison chart on my website comparing
performance of the RV-10 and several others, both certified and
experimental. It can be seen at www.saintaviation.com/perf.htm. This is
all data that I got from the respective websites.

Speaking of which, has anybody seen the article in Kitplanes about the
Raven 500? They are claiming a max gross 900 lbs over the RV-10, yet
still a 650ft takeoff roll and 1500fpm climb, with the same engine. If
they can do it and still get 197Kts, then more power to them, but I highly
doubt it. Any other thoughts on that? Oh yeah, and how about a
500-600hour build. That would be, no doubt, without finishing (paint,
interior, etc.).

Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse(at)saintaviation.com
www.saintaviation.com
C: 352-427-0285

Quote:
Regarding the comparison to other aircraft:

Here is a performance comparison someone put together a long time ago. I
have the original power point and would add to it if someone has the
specific data points for other aircraft of interest. (Bonanza, etc).

I don't know who did this originally, but I did keep a copy.

The points used:

Price, wingspan, length, wing area, empty weight, gross weight, useful
load, useful load - full fuel, wing loading, power loading, engine
horsepower, fuel capacity, cruise speed, takeoff performance, landing
performance, range, climb rate.

Jim Combs
N312F (40192)



- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
pilotdds(at)aol.com
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 6:12 am    Post subject: Performance Comparison Reply with quote

Having owned an original comanche and now flying a 10.I think performance is quite similar.The raven #"s seem realistic exept top/cruise speed seems somewhat optimistic.The published build time is of course outlandish.


--


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
jim(at)CombsFive.Com
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 1:13 pm    Post subject: Performance Comparison Reply with quote

Did you see the cost of the kit? 90K

and the estimate of a finished airplane? 250K

Jim C

Do Not Archive

============================================================
From: jesse(at)saintaviation.com
Date: 2007/03/14 Wed AM 08:19:07 EST
To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Performance Comparison



I have also compiled a comparison chart on my website comparing
performance of the RV-10 and several others, both certified and
experimental. It can be seen at www.saintaviation.com/perf.htm. This is
all data that I got from the respective websites.

Speaking of which, has anybody seen the article in Kitplanes about the
Raven 500? They are claiming a max gross 900 lbs over the RV-10, yet
still a 650ft takeoff roll and 1500fpm climb, with the same engine. If
they can do it and still get 197Kts, then more power to them, but I highly
doubt it. Any other thoughts on that? Oh yeah, and how about a
500-600hour build. That would be, no doubt, without finishing (paint,
interior, etc.).

Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse(at)saintaviation.com
www.saintaviation.com
C: 352-427-0285

Quote:
Regarding the comparison to other aircraft:

Here is a performance comparison someone put together a long time ago. I
have the original power point and would add to it if someone has the
specific data points for other aircraft of interest. (Bonanza, etc).

I don't know who did this originally, but I did keep a copy.

The points used:

Price, wingspan, length, wing area, empty weight, gross weight, useful
load, useful load - full fuel, wing loading, power loading, engine
horsepower, fuel capacity, cruise speed, takeoff performance, landing
performance, range, climb rate.

Jim Combs
N312F (40192)




============================================================


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
jesse(at)saintaviation.co
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 4:16 am    Post subject: Performance Comparison Reply with quote

Yeah, and if they follow the pattern of Van's, it will actually cost
$300,000-350,000.

Jesse Saint
Saint Aviation, Inc.
jesse(at)saintaviation.com
www.saintaviation.com
Cell: 352-427-0285
Fax: 815-377-3694
--


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV10-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group