michael(at)flightsked.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 10:17 am    Post subject: fly-ins | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I've been to a number of fly-ins, including Oshkosh at both the main field 
 and Fond du Lac, Sun-n-Fun, AOPA, and some local events. My observation is 
 that things tend to run smoothly / safely at the extreme ends of the range, 
 and get disorganized / scary in the middle of the range.
 
 At OSH, they've been doing it long enough and enough people are involved 
 with enough interest in everything going well, that it is well-planned and 
 well-organized. There is the occasional glitch, but it's occasional and 
 generally minor, and any real accident (like the T6 last summer) attracts a 
 lot of attention because it is so rare.
 
 The biggest problems at OSH seem to be pilots who don't read or understand 
 the NOTAM. It's kind of large, but well-presented and logical, if you spend 
 some time studying it. I always print it out in a half-page booklet and 
 highlight the important-to-check-in-flight things like frequencies and 
 checkpoints.
 
 I think that everyone is concerned about being the bozo who screws it up, so 
 nearly everyone does understand and follow the procedures. I'm actually 
 impressed how well it works.
 
 My biggest pet peeve at OSH is the grass taxiway surfaces. They're uneven 
 enough that the tiger with a load of camping gear in back can get a kind of 
 harmonic bounce going with the nose gear. They like you to taxi a bit fast 
 there, which makes it worse, and sometimes I just have to stop to damp the 
 oscillation. I wish they'd roll out the grass taxiways to smooth them out, 
 but I guess that's a minor thing.
 The small local events seem to just not attract enough traffic to overload 
 the normal ability of people to stay alert and work out the right thing to 
 do, so with a little advance planning and thought about easing the flow, it 
 works out ok.
 Scary things happen in the middle. S-n-F has (IMHO) a really poor arrival 
 procedure, with indistinct landmarks and a structure that encourages cutting 
 the corners. Real easy to get the sequencing confused.
 
 I guess that since it's not "the big show," there's a significant number of 
 pilots who either don't know about or don't care about the notam, and just 
 kind of blunder in announcing their arrival and asking what to do. What 
 makes it worse is that the controllers will talk them through it. (If you do 
 that at OSH, they'll tell you the notam is available at x, y, and z 
 airports, so go land there and read it.) Lots of chatter and confusion.
 
 Once you arrive at S-n-F, you find that the parking / camping area is pretty 
 poorly prepared. It's evident to me that they consider the folks who drive 
 in with their big camper vans and RVs (not the planes) to be their main 
 customer base, as that's where all the amenities are.
 I really like airplane camping, and I think that the tiger is especially 
 well-suited for it (as long as you're not thinking backwoods strips). I got 
 turned on to it at Oshkosh, and would highly encourage any competent pilot 
 to make the trip. It's a ton of fun, and the best part is just being 
 immersed in aviation - sitting next to your cooler enjoying a cold soda pop 
 watching the airshow, waking up in your tent to the sound of big radial 
 engines, all that good stuff. The smaller events are fun as well, and 
 heading out on your own is best of all.
 
 Michael
 
 ---
 
  |  | - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  |