 |
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jmfpublic(at)comcast.net Guest
|
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:59 pm Post subject: Routing thermocouple wires |
|
|
Bob, or anyone:
Is it reasonable to route thermocouple wires along the spark plug wires? I will be using a thermocouple amplifier with a + and - 15 volt supply. The spec sheet for the AD596AH says to limit common mode input voltages to less than the power supply band. One side of the thermocouple is connected to the power supply common, and I will be using insulated probes to avoid the problem of multiple ground paths and associated voltage offsets. The probe in a ring terminal under the spark plug-see my prior post about this. Neither the spark plug wires nor the thermocouple wire is shielded. Since one side of the thermocouple is grounded to power common, the driving impedance of this source should only be the resistance of the wire itself, which has a resistance of less than 3 ohms. On the Jabiru interest group on Yahoo, one person has run the TC wire with the spark without problem. For design reasons which involve separate "ram air" ducts over each bank of cylinders, routing with the spark plugs would be the easiest. Anyone see a problem with this?
Jim Foerster, J400, wiring
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ainut(at)hiwaay.net Guest
|
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2006 7:30 pm Post subject: Routing thermocouple wires |
|
|
James, let me strongly suggest you do not run tc wire alongside the
spark plug wire. With the large voltages carried in the plug wire, if
there is ever the slightest short, you AD chips are toast, along with
possibly whatever you're reading them with.
Secondly, you need to run a separate ground for each tc all the way to
the AD chips, not use a common ground. Talk to the AD engineers if this
is questionable to you. Yeah, I know I just doubled your firewall
penetration wires, but it has to be done. I didn't like it either .
David M.
James Foerster wrote:
Quote: |
Bob, or anyone:
Is it reasonable to route thermocouple wires along the spark plug wires? I will be using a thermocouple amplifier with a + and - 15 volt supply. The spec sheet for the AD596AH says to limit common mode input voltages to less than the power supply band. One side of the thermocouple is connected to the power supply common, and I will be using insulated probes to avoid the problem of multiple ground paths and associated voltage offsets. The probe in a ring terminal under the spark plug-see my prior post about this. Neither the spark plug wires nor the thermocouple wire is shielded. Since one side of the thermocouple is grounded to power common, the driving impedance of this source should only be the resistance of the wire itself, which has a resistance of less than 3 ohms. On the Jabiru interest group on Yahoo, one person has run the TC wire with the spark without problem. For design reasons which involve separate "ram air" ducts over each bank of cylinders, routing
wi!
|
Quote: | th the spark plugs would be the easiest. Anyone see a problem with this?
Jim Foerster, J400, wiring
|
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|