Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

STCs and otehr BS

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> TeamGrumman-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
GrummanDude



Joined: 15 Jan 2006
Posts: 926
Location: Auburn, CA

PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 11:46 am    Post subject: STCs and otehr BS Reply with quote

Friday I spent most of the morning arguing with the DER and FAA
regarding whether or not I need to do testing on the carb heat rise
with my new cowling. My argument was, "Since I didn't change anything
in the path of the carb heat, I don't need to test." Their argument
was. "You don't know if you changed the pressures enough on the bottom
of the engine compartment enough to affect the heat rise with carb
heat. So, you need to test this."

That is total BS and, since there is no way to prove or disprove the
carb heat question, I have to do a flight test, at my expense, to test
the carb heat rise.

This is just one of many examples of total nonsense issues I've had to
deal with regarding the FAA and STCs.

Did you know that since I went from a square inlet to the carb air
intake duct to a round one, that I have to test a stock airplane's
manifold pressure next to mine to show I have as good or better
manifold pressure?

I have to install a completely instrumented $4,000 alternator to test
for alternator temps since I don't have a baffle separating the
alternator from the underside temps. It doesn't matter that the
original Traveler had the alternator exposed to under cowl temps.

Plus, since the test plane has a Power FLow exhaust on it, my STC is
limited to using the Power Flow until I can afford to repeat all of the
testing with a stock exhaust. Why? Because the stock exhaust will have
different temperatures under the cowling and this might cause the temps
on the accessory housing to be too high.

Now, Kevin Lancaster, can you think of any reason to why the Grummans
shouldn't be re-introduced as experimentals?

--------------

I've been creating the installation instructions while installting the
cowling on Brian's plane. Unfortunately, Brian needs to take his plane
before I can get it installed and tested. Here is the dilemma: I need
a plane to use for conformity. I can't use mine because the cowling on
my plane can't be conformed. The cowling for Brian's plane was
conformed to his plane. Since he is taking his plane back without the
testing being completed (with the original cowling re-installed) now, I
need to get a whole new plane and whole new cowling and conform it for
testing. I'm hoping to talk the FAA into letting me use the conformed
cowling on another plane, and, I'm hoping it fits. Plus, I need to do
a lot of new testing now regarding the Carb Heat.
________________________________________________________________________
from AOL at AOL.com.


- The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List

_________________
Gary
AuCountry Aviation
Home of Team Grumman
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> TeamGrumman-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group