Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

British 601 Crash (was: 601 Crash)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bryanmmartin



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 1018

PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 7:08 am    Post subject: British 601 Crash (was: 601 Crash) Reply with quote

According to the Zenith web site, the 601UL is very similar to the 601HD but is built lighter in some areas with a correspondingly lower gross weight rating for the Canadian Advanced Ultralight category. The 601UL has at least 100 lbs less useful load than either the HD or the XL models. All three models will fit within the US LSA limitations with the XL being the closest match to the LSA category.

http://www.zenithair.com/zodiac/601-ul.html
http://www.zenithair.com/zodiac/601-hd.html

http://www.zenithair.com/zodiac/xl/specification.html

Quote:
--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Scotsman" <james.roberts(at)computershare.co.za>
Is there a difference in the structure of an Xl versus the UL model maybe in the interest of weigh saving to meet the LSA requirements?





-- 
Bryan Martin
N61BM, CH 601 XL,
RAM Subaru, Stratus redrive.
do not archive.


[quote][b]


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List

_________________
--
Bryan Martin
N61BM, CH 601 XL, Stratus Subaru.
do not archive.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Scotsman



Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Posts: 89
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 7:22 am    Post subject: Re: British 601 Crash (was: 601 Crash) Reply with quote

Makes you wonder what was reduced/removed to facilitate this? j

- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
jetboy



Joined: 22 Jul 2006
Posts: 233

PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 2:35 pm    Post subject: Re: British 601 Crash (was: 601 Crash) Reply with quote

The 601UL has less wing ribs installed amongst other things. There is nothing "taken out" to make it cheap or anything - just designed for a specific weight / performance category. If the aircraft is being operated outside of that category it needs the heavier parts, or placarded with the lower Va / Vne speeds that ZAC supplies the calculation formula for.

Ralph


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List

_________________
Ralph - CH701 / 2200a
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bryanmmartin



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 1018

PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 12:03 pm    Post subject: British 601 Crash (was: 601 Crash) Reply with quote

Quote:

amyvega2005(at)earthlink. wrote:
> If it was lighter it would stall, but with more stuff inside it, the wings will start to complain. We are flying a sport pilot rated arecraft that is robust, not an EXTRA 300.
>
> Juan
>
> --




Actually, I'm sure it's even more likely to be stalling at a higher rate of speed, it's just that there's a lot more drag on the wing at higher speeds and that's what's snapping the wings. A lightly loaded plane and a heavily loaded plane, pulled up quickly, will exert just as much stress on the wings, the only difference is the lighter plane will climb 50 or 100 feet while the wings fail where as the heavier plane will just continue in a straight line while the wings break off.

--------
Andy Shontz

Not quite.

There are two ways to stall an airplane, keep the G loading constant and
reduce the speed or keep the speed constant and increase the G loading.
In other words, for any particular airspeed, there is a maximum amount
of lift that the wings can generate, beyond that point the wing will stall.

For any aircraft, the rated clean stall speed (Vs) is the speed at which
the wings can just generate enough lift to carry the gross weight of the
airplane. At higher speeds than Vs, the wings can generate more lift
than the max gross weight of the airplane but they can still be made to
stall if the G loading is increased enough. If the airspeed is higher
than maneuvering speed (Va), the G loading that will cause the wings to
stall exceeds the maximum flight G loading of the structure. In other
words, the wings can generate more lift than the structure can safely
handle. This is what causes wings to fail during a sharp pull-up at high
speeds. Drag is not generally going to be a factor in structural failure
unless you significantly exceed Vne because most aircraft are designed
to tolerate their maximum flight G loading at Vne without damage.

--
Bryan Martin
Zenith 601XL N61BM
Ram Subaru, Stratus redrive


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List

_________________
--
Bryan Martin
N61BM, CH 601 XL, Stratus Subaru.
do not archive.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
planecrazydld(at)yahoo.co
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:28 am    Post subject: British 601 Crash (was: 601 Crash) Reply with quote

do not archive

...and with forward sweep, normal bending tends to add incidence (lift) at the tip faster than the root...

Dave Downey
Harleysville (SE) PA
100 HP Corvair



---


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group