 |
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jpx(at)qenesis.com Guest
|
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:31 am Post subject: Z13/8 over current protection |
|
|
Based on Bob's previous comments, I have decided that Z13/8 is more
suitable for my aircraft.
Should I include an ANL limiter between the battery contactor and the
main power bus ?
Perhaps the fuselink shown between the endurance bus and the alternate
feed switch might provide more encompassing protection located between
the main power bus and the diode ?
Why both a fuselink and a breaker in the feed from the main power bus
to the regulator ?
Thanks !
Jeff Page
Tundra #10
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nuckolls.bob(at)cox.net Guest
|
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 8:21 pm Post subject: Z13/8 over current protection |
|
|
At 11:28 AM 11/18/2007 -0500, you wrote:
Quote: |
Based on Bob's previous comments, I have decided that Z13/8 is more
suitable for my aircraft.
Should I include an ANL limiter between the battery contactor and the
main power bus ?
|
There is not one shown because this pathway has
not been demonstrated to benefit from adding the
protection . . . in fact, the FARS exempt this piece
of wire from getting such protection in TC aircraft.
Quote: | Perhaps the fuselink shown between the endurance bus and the alternate
feed switch might provide more encompassing protection located between
the main power bus and the diode ?
|
?? the purpose of this link is to protect the wire
between the battery bus and the switch. Moving it
someplace else would not help that wire . . .
Quote: | Why both a fuselink and a breaker in the feed from the main power bus
to the regulator ?
|
Because if the main bus is a fuse block -AND- it's remotely mounted
for convenience of installation and maintenance then it's also
remote to the panel where the 5A breaker needs to go. This puts a
longer-than-6-inches hot wire between the fuse block and the
breaker that is part of the crowbar ov protection system and should
be mounted on the panel. This piece of wire is best protected with
a fusible link having a fault-reaction response-time that is
longer than for the breaker. If you used a fuse here, the fuse
would open before the breaker does and negate the convenience
of putting the breaker on the panel. See:
http://www.aeroelectric.com/PPS/Switch_Panels/spanel.pdf
http://www.aeroelectric.com/PPS/Switch_Panels/Switches.pdf
Bob . . .
----------------------------------------)
( . . . a long habit of not thinking )
( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial )
( appearance of being right . . . )
( )
( -Thomas Paine 1776- )
----------------------------------------
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jpx(at)qenesis.com Guest
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 10:23 pm Post subject: Z13/8 over current protection |
|
|
Quote: | >Perhaps the fuselink shown between the endurance bus and the alternate
>feed switch might provide more encompassing protection located between
>the main power bus and the diode ?
?? the purpose of this link is to protect the wire
between the battery bus and the switch. Moving it
someplace else would not help that wire . . .
|
To me, it would seem that the wire between the Battery Bus and E-Bus
Alternate Feed switch is protected by the 7A fuse from the Battery Bus ?
If a short to ground occurred in that wire, and the 7A Battery Bus
fuse blows, then the source of power becomes the Main Power
Distribution Bus if the E-Bus Alternate Switch is closed. The
fuselink as shown blows.
If the fuselink is moved to between the Diode and the Main Power
Distribution Bus, the fuselink would still blow, but would also
protect the wires connecting the diode - those have no protection at
all as shown ?
Jeff Page
Dream Aircraft Tundra #10
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|