Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Elevator Limits (Cessna 172)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dougsnash(at)yahoo.com
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 5:37 pm    Post subject: Elevator Limits (Cessna 172) Reply with quote

Tim, while this is a little off topic, I think there
was something about a Gross Weight increase on the 172
if the controls and flaps were limited.

When I did my 172 check ride last year (up from 152s)
I was surprised that the flaps would not come all the
way down, the GWT increase was the reason I was given.

Do not archive

Doug MacDonald
CH-701 Scratch builder
NW Ontario, Canada'

--- Tim Juhl <juhl(at)avci.net> wrote:

Quote:

<juhl(at)avci.net>

I read CH's letter with great interest. At least a
little light has been shown on the issue of
structural failure and a "fix" that may help reduce
such tragedies.

The discussion of adding elevator stops brought
something to mind that I thought I would share. I
have instructed in Cessna 172's varying in vintage
from 1956 to 1985. I owned a 1968 model for 23
years. I was surprised to find in the 1985 models
that the max flap extension had been reduced to 30°
and both aileron and elevator deflections had been
limited. Indeed, I found that the older aircraft
had greater ability to get in and out of short
strips and deal with strong, gusty crosswinds.
True, the later models were a little faster and for
the most part I never noticed the control limits,
but I can imagine situations where the extra travel
might have been useful.

Special deal for Yahoo! users & friends - No Cost. Get a month of Blockbuster Total Access now
http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text3.com


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
Tim Juhl



Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 488
Location: "Thumb" of Michigan

PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:30 am    Post subject: Re: Elevator Limits (Cessna 172) Reply with quote

The increase in gross weight was one of the reasons cited. Another was the problem some pilots experienced if they initiated a go-around with full flaps extended. There was also the long standing concern about full flaps blanking the tail in a forward slip although I've intentionally tried to make that happen with no success.

One of the things that surprised me was in checking aileron control movement was that you used to be able to turn the wheel 90° to either side while on the 1985 model you were hitting the stops at maybe 50°. Now - I will admit I did not take a protractor and measure actual aileron deflections so maybe the change wasn't that extreme. Anyone who has flown a very early 172 and a 1985 or later model knows that they are two very different machines.

Tim
do not archive


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List

_________________
______________
CFII
Champ L16A flying
Zodiac XL - Jabiru 3300A
Almost done! It'll fly in spring!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ashontz



Joined: 27 Dec 2006
Posts: 723

PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:55 am    Post subject: Re: Elevator Limits (Cessna 172) Reply with quote

I've rented various 152s of which some of them had 40 degrees of flap and others were only 30 degrees. Neither were aerobats or anything. I figured it was just some design change that had occurred from one year to the next.

Tim Juhl wrote:
The increase in gross weight was one of the reasons cited. Another was the problem some pilots experienced if they initiated a go-around with full flaps extended. There was also the long standing concern about full flaps blanking the tail in a forward slip although I've intentionally tried to make that happen with no success.

One of the things that surprised me was in checking aileron control movement was that you used to be able to turn the wheel 90° to either side while on the 1985 model you were hitting the stops at maybe 50°. Now - I will admit I did not take a protractor and measure actual aileron deflections so maybe the change wasn't that extreme. Anyone who has flown a very early 172 and a 1985 or later model knows that they are two very different machines.

Tim
do not archive


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
planecrazydld(at)yahoo.co
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 4:50 pm    Post subject: Elevator Limits (Cessna 172) Reply with quote

all the 150s I flew were 40° while all the 152s were 30°. May have to do with the model?

ashontz <ashontz(at)nbme.org> wrote:[quote] --> Zenith-List message posted by: "ashontz"

I've rented various 152s of which some of them had 40 degrees of flap and others were only 30 degrees. Neither were aerobats or anything. I figured it was just some design change that had occurred from one year to the next.
Tim Juhl wrote:
[quote] The increase in gross weight was one of the reasons cited. Another was the problem some pilots experienced if they initiated a go-around with full flaps extended. There was also the long standing concern about full flaps blanking the tail in a forward slip although I've intentionally tried to make that happen with no success.

One of the things that surprised me was in [quote][b]


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group