Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

RES: Re: 91 octane, time to be heard!

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
espuny(at)terra.com.br
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 2:48 pm    Post subject: RES: Re: 91 octane, time to be heard! Reply with quote

Ethanol is a great fuel, more powerfull, cheaper and less poluent when used
with the proper engine.
The detonation of ethanol requires more compression rates, so the first
ethanol fueled engines couldn't run on gas because they were built for
ethanol.
Now we have the absolutelly safe "flex" technology that allows an engine to
run either on gas, ethanol, or any blend of them, but this required years of
research and the engines have an injection computerized system that "reads"
the fuel composition and performs as it has to be. The engines have also
higer compressiom rates to burn alcohol and are stronger to bear the burn of
gas at those rates, and other developments.
There are also many certified air engines and certified planes flying on
100% ethanol here, in Brazil (the world's largest ethanol producer and the
first to adopt the use of it in cars in large scale, more than 20 years
ago). Very safe for flying, but the hole project was directed to it (engine,
tanks, exhaust system, injection, materials, filters...).
What I want everybody to understand is the fact that we have to observe what
the engine factory writes in the manual. That's all.
So, when Rotax, Jabiru and other tell us formally that we can use ethanol,
they'll also tell us how much of it a fuel may contain. Because there's no
freedom of choice of % . There are narrow limits unless aviation adopts
today"s modern bi-fuel car tech.
So, lets just ask them and let the factories publish their instructions and
follow it.

-----Mensagem original-----
De: owner-kitfox-list-server(at)matronics.com
[mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server(at)matronics.com] Em nome de Roger Lee
Enviada em: sábado, 9 de agosto de 2008 18:43
Para: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
Assunto: Re: 91 octane, time to be heard!



Hi Noel,

I think that's all anyone wants is some fuel we can use with no alcohol.
Many people like the unleaded 91 because it's cheaper and less damaging to
their engine than the leaded stuff.

--------
Roger Lee
Tucson, Az.
Light Sport Repairman - Maintenance Rated
Rotax Service Center
520-574-1080


Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=197568#197568

Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
Atualizado em 09/08/2008


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group