  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		shinden33
 
 
  Joined: 02 Nov 2007 Posts: 39
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 9:05 am    Post subject: Rolling G Limits | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				All, 
 
 Has anyone heard mention of asymmetric or rolling g limits on civilian aircraft.  I've seen them with military aircraft but I have never heard mention of rolling g limitations for civilian aircraft until today.   What's really disturbing is that FAR 23.349 states that structural requirements for certification only require that the airplane be built for rolling loads at 2/3 of symmetric G limit.  http://rgl.faa.gov/REGULATORY_AND_GUIDANCE_LIBRARY/RGFAR.NSF/0/E6FD59161E5CCA9685256687006D10A2?OpenDocument
 From the look of this reg, US airplanes may have implied limit?  Anyone have any experience with rolling g limits on civil aircraft?  More importantly for this crew, does anyone have any gouge on rolling g limits for Yaks and CJs?
 
 Scott
 N8252
 
  |  | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		dsavarese0812(at)bellsout Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 9:31 am    Post subject: Rolling G Limits | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Scott,
 I am not aware of any published rolling G limitations for the Yak 52.  That 
 doesn't mean that somewhere in the archives of this airplane's engineering 
 documentation there isn't one.  I just have never seen one.
 Dennis
 
 ---
 
  |  | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Joe Enzminger
 
 
  Joined: 06 Feb 2006 Posts: 26
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:53 pm    Post subject: Re: Rolling G Limits | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I don't think you'll find published limits in your approved flight manual, but the fact of the matter is there is a limit.  In other words, if you pull to your limit load factor and then add full aileron, something is going to bend or break, no doubt about it and no way to design around it.
 
 The 2/3 limit is a good rule of thumb with a safety factor built in, but if it's not a U.S. Certificated airplane, there's no guarantee it'll work out.  I could go into all the other issues (like decreased fatigue life, etc.) that come into play with "Rolling G's", but the fact of the matter is it's better to "unload, roll, load".
 
 Incidentally, this doesn't apply to snap rolls.  While I wouldn't do it (simply because it's hard to be this precise), you can snap at the limit load factor without concern for the effects of rolling G's.  The maximum (not recommended) snap speed is usually the speed at which the airplane will stall at the limit load factor. 
 
 Joe
 
  |  | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		wlannon(at)persona.ca Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 4:22 pm    Post subject: Rolling G Limits | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Turning/rolling  positive "G" limit for the CJ6 is 3.6.
 This is information received by Joe Howse some years ago from  Mr. Yiji Guo, 
 Senior Engineer, Beijing Aeronautical Technology Research Centre.
 It has been published on the Yak List numerous times over the past years by 
 Joe and myself.
 
 3.6 G represents 60% of the normal 6G limit for symmetrical loading and is, 
 as far as I know, an industry standard to avoid the possibility of exceeding 
 the normal limit with unequal loading..
 I have no information for the Yak 52 but expect a similar standard would 
 exist for that.
 
 Walt
 
 ---
 
  |  | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		petervs(at)knology.net Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Aug 06, 2008 6:50 pm    Post subject: Rolling G Limits | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				When I was taking aerobatics instruction in the Yak from Sergie I 
 asked him the best way to break a Yak. His reply was to do snap rolls 
 without fully stalling the wings. So I guess that means that if you 
 don't fully stall the wing before the snap roll you will be inducing 
 rolling g's.
 
 Pete
 At 06:53 PM 8/6/2008, you wrote:
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
 
 I don't think you'll find published limits in your approved flight 
 manual, but the fact of the matter is there is a limit.  In other 
 words, if you pull to your limit load factor and then add full 
 aileron, something is going to bend or break, no doubt about it and 
 no way to design around it.
 
 The 2/3 limit is a good rule of thumb with a safety factor built in, 
 but if it's not a U.S. Certificated airplane, there's no guarantee 
 it'll work out.  I could go into all the other issues (like 
 decreased fatigue life, etc.) that come into play with "Rolling 
 G's", but the fact of the matter is it's better to "unload, roll, load".
 
 Incidentally, this doesn't apply to snap rolls.  While I wouldn't do 
 it (simply because it's hard to be this precise), you can snap at 
 the limit load factor without concern for the effects of rolling 
 G's.  The maximum (not recommended) snap speed is usually the speed 
 at which the airplane will stall at the limit load factor.
 
 Joe
 
 
 Read this topic online here:
 
 http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=196994#196994
 
 
 | 	 
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |