 |
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:06 am Post subject: IVOPROP |
|
|
Ron: When the system is not being used it is 3 amp.
BN: What is drawing current when the prop pitch motor
is not running?
Ron: This is a good questions but I do not have an answer for it.
3 x 8 = 24 amp when the circuit breaks. Reaches the stop at 15 amp.
BN: I'm still trying to understand the amount of
energy required to satisfy in-flight operating
requirements. It would stand to reason that
normal running currents (motor in motion and
free of the mechanical stops) are a small
fraction of stall current (motor energized
but prevented of motion because it is
jammed).
Hmmmm . . . I take it you are not the designer
for this product's electrics. Can I have some
conversation with the designer or at least someone
who has understanding of the physics of this
system?
I'm thinking there are easy things you can do
electronically to improve on the system's
integrity and eliminate installation variability/
error to achieve advertised performance.
Ron: I found the system is using 3 amps when there is no load on the spool.
This is when it goes through neutral transition between positive pitch
and negative pitch from neutral. When the switch is not used there is no
current.
The designer has moved to a remote secluded location where he can
work on other inventions without any distractions. That is why I
am doing my best to answer your questions without bothering him.
There are no plans to change or modify our propeller design at this time.
-----------------------------------
Okay, based on this limited exchange I have to deduce
that the gentleman has but a rudimentary knowledge
of how the product works. He is unable to discuss
the physics of the motor's performance at or near
stall with any notions of improving on user-
friendliness. One noteworthy design goal would be
to eliminate the requirement for fine tuning the
resistance in hookup wire and/or sizing a specific
style of breaker. This feature alone would get
him tossed out of a design review meeting at
any of the places I've worked.
My best guess is that the motor draws 3A at
the "no-load" point roughly centered on min-
max prop pitch. Departures either direction
from neutral winds up the springs causing motor
current to rise. Peak current happens at
some point just before the system hits the
mechanical stops. There is no current draw
when the motor is not running.
This all makes sense. What does not make sense
is the tailoring of total loop resistance
by selection of wire and tailoring of a specific
circuit breaker to achieve a "safe" reaction
to an overload.
Of course, none of this speaks to mechanical
issues in this product's design. It does give one
pause to consider the effectiveness of product
support when difficulties are identified in
the field. It's also alarming that the designer
finds it necessary to become secluded from the
customers that need a better understanding of
product characteristics than can be offered by
the present spokesperson.
Bob . . .
----------------------------------------)
( . . . a long habit of not thinking )
( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial )
( appearance of being right . . . )
( )
( -Thomas Paine 1776- )
----------------------------------------
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jcorner(at)shaw.ca Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 8:43 am Post subject: IVOPROP |
|
|
Bob
I have used all three models of IVO Props over the years, and I like
the design because of the simplicity and cost.
The attached PDF shows the construction of the prop hub and the wiring
that controls it.
I have found that if the toggle switch is held after the prop hits the
mechanical stops the circuit breaker will pop regardless of the
length of wire.
The best method of setting prop pitch in the air or on the ground is
to use an ammeter in series rather than just watching RPM's. This
also can prevent breaker tripping. The problem here is finding a
suitably scaled ammeter, in a compact size. Anyone?
I have trimmed the wire length to what is required in two out of three
installations without any apparent adverse effect.
Jim
On 10-Apr-09, at 9:06 AM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III wrote:
Quote: |
>
Ron: When the system is not being used it is 3 amp.
BN: What is drawing current when the prop pitch motor
is not running?
Ron: This is a good questions but I do not have an answer for it.
3 x 8 = 24 amp when the circuit breaks. Reaches the stop at 15
amp.
BN: I'm still trying to understand the amount of
energy required to satisfy in-flight operating
requirements. It would stand to reason that
normal running currents (motor in motion and
free of the mechanical stops) are a small
fraction of stall current (motor energized
but prevented of motion because it is
jammed).
Hmmmm . . . I take it you are not the designer
for this product's electrics. Can I have some
conversation with the designer or at least someone
who has understanding of the physics of this
system?
I'm thinking there are easy things you can do
electronically to improve on the system's
integrity and eliminate installation variability/
error to achieve advertised performance.
Ron: I found the system is using 3 amps when there is no load on the
spool.
This is when it goes through neutral transition between positive pitch
and negative pitch from neutral. When the switch is not used there
is no
current.
The designer has moved to a remote secluded location where he can
work on other inventions without any distractions. That is why I
am doing my best to answer your questions without bothering him.
There are no plans to change or modify our propeller design at this
time.
-----------------------------------
Okay, based on this limited exchange I have to deduce
that the gentleman has but a rudimentary knowledge
of how the product works. He is unable to discuss
the physics of the motor's performance at or near
stall with any notions of improving on user-
friendliness. One noteworthy design goal would be
to eliminate the requirement for fine tuning the
resistance in hookup wire and/or sizing a specific
style of breaker. This feature alone would get
him tossed out of a design review meeting at
any of the places I've worked.
My best guess is that the motor draws 3A at
the "no-load" point roughly centered on min-
max prop pitch. Departures either direction
from neutral winds up the springs causing motor
current to rise. Peak current happens at
some point just before the system hits the
mechanical stops. There is no current draw
when the motor is not running.
This all makes sense. What does not make sense
is the tailoring of total loop resistance
by selection of wire and tailoring of a specific
circuit breaker to achieve a "safe" reaction
to an overload.
Of course, none of this speaks to mechanical
issues in this product's design. It does give one
pause to consider the effectiveness of product
support when difficulties are identified in
the field. It's also alarming that the designer
finds it necessary to become secluded from the
customers that need a better understanding of
product characteristics than can be offered by
the present spokesperson.
Bob . . .
----------------------------------------)
( . . . a long habit of not thinking )
( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial )
( appearance of being right . . . )
( )
( -Thomas Paine 1776- )
----------------------------------------
|
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
Description: |
|
 Download |
Filename: |
Ivo_Mag_PDF003.pdf |
Filesize: |
819.04 KB |
Downloaded: |
312 Time(s) |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:33 am Post subject: IVOPROP |
|
|
At 11:40 AM 4/10/2009, you wrote:
Quote: | Bob
I have used all three models of IVO Props over the years, and I like
the design because of the simplicity and cost.
The attached PDF shows the construction of the prop hub and the wiring
that controls it.
I have found that if the toggle switch is held after the prop hits the
mechanical stops the circuit breaker will pop regardless of the
length of wire.
The best method of setting prop pitch in the air or on the ground is
to use an ammeter in series rather than just watching RPM's. This
also can prevent breaker tripping. The problem here is finding a
suitably scaled ammeter, in a compact size. Anyone?
|
Perhaps one of these paired with the appropriate shunt
sized for max load?
https://matronics.com/aeroelectric/Catalog/AEC/9007/9007.html
Quote: | I have trimmed the wire length to what is required in two out of three
installations without any apparent adverse effect.
|
I would have guessed that . . .
I've designed actuator control systems designed to
limit travel with hard stops as opposed to limit
switches. One technique involves a small constant
current limit module that allows one a few percent
more than max operating current to flow. This value
is generally well under the value of the protective
circuit breaker. Further, performance in both normal
and fault modes is independent of breaker or wire
selection.
If you'd like to experiment with such a system, I'd
be pleased to support the effort with a proof
of concept limiter.
Another option would be to evaluate the polyswitch.
It's successful incorporation would emulate the
electric window risers on most cars. Those systems
don't have limit switches either. They depend on
operator response to release the switch in some
reasonable time after window limits are reached.
But if the operator is slow, the mechanism jams
or the switch sticks, the polyswitch keeps all
the smoke inside the wires.
This product's relative success in the field shows
a lot of promise. It's too bad that the business
model for its production is not more conducive
to the fine tuning of a recipe for success.
Bob . . .
----------------------------------------)
( . . . a long habit of not thinking )
( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial )
( appearance of being right . . . )
( )
( -Thomas Paine 1776- )
----------------------------------------
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|