Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Newbie questions, which easier to fly a Kitfox or a CH 701

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guy Buchanan



Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 1204
Location: Ramona, CA

PostPosted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 2:03 pm    Post subject: Newbie questions, which easier to fly a Kitfox or a CH 701 Reply with quote

At 12:15 PM 4/24/2009, you wrote:
Quote:
Im looking into the Zenith CH 701 or maybe a kitfox, for my needs
what do you guys think is best?
I want a Rotax 912 in the nose on either plane.

That's easy. Kitfox all the way. (After all, this IS the Kitfox
forum.) Seriously, though, you've got to fly them yourself. There's
no way to tell otherwise.
Guy Buchanan
San Diego, CA
K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 300 hrs. and counting


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Guy Buchanan
Deceased K-IV 1200
A glider pilot too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
dave



Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 1382

PostPosted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 2:39 am    Post subject: Re: Newbie questions, which easier to fly a Kitfox or a CH Reply with quote

I have a friend with a 701 912 ul .
I have a kitfox 582 that is faster cruise and take offs not much different. His angle of climb a bit steeper.
He wants to travel further and faster and just finished a Sonex with jab 3300.


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Realtime Kitfox movies to separate the internet chatter from the truth
http://www.youtube.com/user/kitfoxflyer
Hundreds of Kitfox Movies
Most viewed Kitfox on youtube
Most popular on youtube
Highest rated on youtube
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
Guy Buchanan



Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 1204
Location: Ramona, CA

PostPosted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:39 pm    Post subject: Newbie questions, which easier to fly a Kitfox or a CH 701 Reply with quote

At 11:50 AM 4/26/2009, you wrote:
Quote:
So vortex generators are made /tested and sold by the Kitfox factory? or is just an aftermarket product?
Is not totally tested yet?

Hi,
I think I missed your name. Here on the Kitfox list we encourage you to put your full name, location, and aircraft status/type in your signature.
I think Lowell will tell you that VG's have been rather thoroughly tested on Kitfoxes with little improvement shown. (See the archives for lots of talk and a little data.) What HAS been shown to work is leading edge slats. We had one fellow claim stall speeds in the 20's. What I want to see is someone install the slats made by Turbine Cubs of Wyoming. These are free-floating slats that supposedly dramatically reduce stall speeds while reducing top end very little.


Guy Buchanan, Kitfox List Moderator
San Diego, CA
K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 300 hrs. and counting [quote][b]


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Guy Buchanan
Deceased K-IV 1200
A glider pilot too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Float Flyr



Joined: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 2704
Location: Campbellton, Newfoundland

PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:18 am    Post subject: Newbie questions, which easier to fly a Kitfox or a CH 701 Reply with quote

Vortex generators are made by many different firms. They are used on just about every large aircraft going. Vortex generators and wing fences are easily seen on the DHC-2 Otter. The idea is if you can cause tiny vortices to form on the top of the wing then the air passing over the wing will remain intact with the top of the wing at steeper angles of attack giving more lift at slower speeds. Obviously there is a point of diminishing returns.

The most important factor of installing vortex generators is to find the right spot on the wing chord to place them. Generally this is around 10% chord but may be as far aft as thickest point of the chord.

Dave has installed vortex generators to the bottom of his cowl. They cause more air to pass through his radiator for better cooling. Others have put them on the bottom of the horizontal stabs where they give more elevator control in the flare.

Noel

From: owner-kitfox-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Guy Buchanan
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 2:02 AM
To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Re: Newbie questions, which easier to fly a Kitfox or a CH 701



At 11:50 AM 4/26/2009, you wrote:


So vortex generators are made /tested and sold by the Kitfox factory? or is just an aftermarket product?
Is not totally tested yet?

Hi,
I think I missed your name. Here on the Kitfox list we encourage you to put your full name, location, and aircraft status/type in your signature.
I think Lowell will tell you that VG's have been rather thoroughly tested on Kitfoxes with little improvement shown. (See the archives for lots of talk and a little data.) What HAS been shown to work is leading edge slats. We had one fellow claim stall speeds in the 20's. What I want to see is someone install the slats made by Turbine Cubs of Wyoming. These are free-floating slats that supposedly dramatically reduce stall speeds while reducing top end very little.



Guy Buchanan, Kitfox List Moderator
San Diego, CA
K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 300 hrs. and counting
Quote:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
0
Quote:
1
Quote:
2
Quote:
3
Quote:
4
Quote:
5
Quote:
6
Quote:
7
Quote:
8
Quote:
9
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Noel Loveys
Kitfox III-A
Aerocet 1100 Floats
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group