 |
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 4:32 am Post subject: Stero to Mono |
|
|
At 06:40 AM 6/4/2009, you wrote:
Greetings... I'm a bit confused on this subject after reading this
thread and similar threads in other lists. I have the same objective:
plug my iPod into my Xcom 760's audio in. The Xcom's documentation
says to use a 3.5mm mono jack in combination with a stereo-to-mono
adapter plug. My thought was to eliminate the adapter plug by simply
jumping the left/right channel pins on the jack itself, and this does
indeed give [seemingly] good results with both channels clearly
heard. But lately I've read that this may damage the iPod, and I
should be using resistors/capacitors and/or the adaptor, as though
the adaptor had some components built into it's small, moulded little
case. I'm relatively sure that this adaptor plug is doing nothing but
physically joining the left and right channels from the stereo plug
into a single tip on the mono plug, and is in no way electronically 'magic'.
Not wanting to damage my iPod, I'd be interested to know the science
behind all the posts saying 'don't do it' (wire the left and right
together), use the adaptor plug. Thanks!
The roots of this thread go back a few years. The
first adaptation I recall of a common commercial
stereo music product into an OBAM aircraft was for
a builder wanting to adapt a compact automotive
AM/FM radio to his airplane. In fact, he had pulled
a non-working ADF and was plugging the hold with the
automotive receiver. He missed the ADF's ability to
turn the AM radio stations.
This was before car radios featured low-level audio
output/input jacks. The only outputs were intended to
deliver WATTS of energy to speakers. Voltage levels
at the speaker output of such radios were much higher
than necessary to service the headphone level inputs
to intercom systems in tens of milliwatts.
The task then had several considerations. The output
stages of the radio were designed to deliver energy
to low resistance loads (4 ohm speakers). If not
similarly loaded in this new application, audio quality
at low output levels might suffer (cross-over distortion).
So the first thing we did was "load" the radio with
some handy but relatively low value resistor . . .
10 ohms, 1 watt was common.
After that, the too-high output voltage needed to
be attenuated to levels appropriate to headphone
input levels at the intercom. At the same time, the
right-left stereo signals needed to be mixed in a
manner that provided a summation of the two signals,
not a conflict. By conflict, I mean that simultaneous
positive and negative going transients in program
material do not cause large currents to circulate
between the right and left amplifier output stages.
The risk for damage to the system is low. The strongest
effect for these circulating currents is distortion
of the audio. It's common practice to first reduce
the potential for circulating currents between the
two outputs by artificially raising their output
impedances (series resistors) and then setting the
system losses with a downstream load (parallel
resistor) to set volume.
In this example
http://aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Schematics/WalkmanAdapter.gif
only mixing resistors are called for but if the
signals from the audio source proved too strong, a
resistor on the order of 10 to 100 ohms could be
paralleled with the output to bring the level
down to size.
Bob . . .
---------------------------------------
( . . . a long habit of not thinking )
( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial )
( appearance of being right . . . )
( )
( -Thomas Paine 1776- )
---------------------------------------
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jd(at)lawsonimaging.ca Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:37 am Post subject: Stero to Mono |
|
|
Robert L. Nuckolls, III wrote:
Quote: |
The roots of this thread go back a few years. The
first adaptation I recall of a common commercial
stereo music product into an OBAM aircraft was for
a builder wanting to adapt a compact automotive
AM/FM radio to his airplane. In fact, he had pulled
a non-working ADF and was plugging the hold with the
automotive receiver. He missed the ADF's ability to
turn the AM radio stations.
---------------snip -------------
|
Thanks so much for this inclusive explanation, Bob. In my particular case,
though, I *think* it's safe to assume that the modern Xcom 760 radio is designed
with iPod/CD player input in mind, and that any attenuation/gain/amplification
is done on the radio's c.b. The fact that the manufacturer states to simply use
a 3.5mm mono jack along with a stereo-to-mono adapter plug from the iPod
headphone out, enforces this assumption, in my mind.
My question, really, is if shorting the ring and tip pins on a stereo jack
installed on my panel is the electrical equivalent of using the adapter plug.
Which begs the question: do those adapter plugs contain any sort of electronic
components at all? Since the price of these critters ranges from $1.00 at the
Dollar store to $9.95 at the Source (Canadian Radio Shack, gold plated), perhaps
the high-end ones do, but I doubt it. The sound is good the way I've got it
(jack pins connected), hearing both channels mixed, good volume. Just don't want
to put my little iTouch at risk, as some have implied I may be doing...
Thanks, again!
--
Regards, J.
Sonex C-FJNJ, Jab 3300, Prince P-Tip
http://cleco.ca
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| J. Davis, M.Sc. | (computer science) |
| *NIX consulting, SysAdmin | email: jd at lawsonimaging.ca |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
and now... Deep Thought #35, by Jack Handy
When you go in for a job interview, I think a good thing to ask is if they
ever press charges.
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:25 am Post subject: Stero to Mono |
|
|
Quote: | Thanks so much for this inclusive explanation, Bob. In my particular
case, though, I *think* it's safe to assume that the modern Xcom 760
radio is designed with iPod/CD player input in mind, and that any
attenuation/gain/amplification is done on the radio's c.b. The fact
that the manufacturer states to simply use a 3.5mm mono jack along
with a stereo-to-mono adapter plug from the iPod headphone out,
enforces this assumption, in my mind.
|
Yes, we're talking headphone levels for
signal strength in both the aviation and
the pocket entertainment world. These voltage
levels are on in the ballpark with votlages
that are exchanged between component systems
on their line-in/out jacks.
Quote: | My question, really, is if shorting the ring and tip pins on a
stereo jack installed on my panel is the electrical equivalent of
using the adapter plug. Which begs the question: do those adapter
plugs contain any sort of electronic components at all? Since the
price of these critters ranges from $1.00 at the Dollar store to
$9.95 at the Source (Canadian Radio Shack, gold plated), perhaps the
high-end ones do, but I doubt it. The sound is good the way I've got
it (jack pins connected), hearing both channels mixed, good volume.
Just don't want to put my little iTouch at risk, as some have
implied I may be doing...
|
The only way to see if there are components
included inside the adapter is to research
it from outside with test equipment. I suspect
they have none. Modern integrated circuits
are quite tolerant of "circulating currents"
so if you're satisfied with the audio quality
then no further action is necessary.
Bob . . .
---------------------------------------
( . . . a long habit of not thinking )
( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial )
( appearance of being right . . . )
( )
( -Thomas Paine 1776- )
---------------------------------------
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|