  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		goodings(at)yorku.ca Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 6:43 am    Post subject: Zenith-List Digest: 5 Msgs - 10/05/09 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I have not flown a CH2000.  In my opinion, a Cherokee 140 would NOT be a 
 good primer for a CH601HD or HDS.  An aircraft with a control wheel (as in 
 the CH2000) is NOT a good primer for the stick in an HD or HDS.  I don't 
 think it would prepare a relatively low-time pilot (like me!) for the very 
 sensitive pitch control in an HD or HDS.
 
 John Goodings, C-FGPJ, CH601HD with R912S, Carp/Ottawa/Toronto.
 
  |  | - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		psm(at)att.net Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 7:47 am    Post subject: Zenith-List Digest: 5 Msgs - 10/05/09 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Hi John,
 
 I agree with you, but your comment got me thinking.
 
 The more different model planes you fly, the more likely you will 
 learn to control your pitch and other attitude components by visual 
 feedback rather than thinking a certain force will get a known 
 response.  Even  flying the exact same plane from one extreme loading 
 to another can make a big difference in pitch response.  Once you 
 learn to use visual feedback for you attitude control it gets much 
 easier to fly any plane and to switch from one to another.
 
 That said, each make and model flies differently from all 
 others.  The only way to really get appropriate experience is to fly 
 the exact make and model of interest.  Perhaps that is why you need 
 to make three landings in the given model before taking passengers.
 
 Insurance companies and brokers are very good at finding close 
 substitutes for rare planes.  To qualify for insurance in a CH601XL I 
 had one broker tell me I needed to get time in anything with a 601 in 
 the model and another tell me I needed time in the exact same model to qualify.
 
 Paul
 XL awaiting engineering changes
 do not archive
 
 At 07:43 AM 10/6/2009, you wrote:
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  I have not flown a CH2000.  In my opinion, a Cherokee 140 would NOT 
 be a good primer for a CH601HD or HDS.  An aircraft with a control 
 wheel (as in the CH2000) is NOT a good primer for the stick in an HD 
 or HDS.  I don't think it would prepare a relatively low-time pilot 
 (like me!) for the very sensitive pitch control in an HD or HDS.
 
 John Goodings, C-FGPJ, CH601HD with R912S, Carp/Ottawa/Toronto.
 
 | 	 
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Doug.Norman(at)sportaviat Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:24 am    Post subject: Zenith-List Digest: 5 Msgs - 10/05/09 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I've been told that a Grumman is a close approximation. Even to the
 pitchiness.
 
 --
 
  |  | - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		fgantt(at)texaviation.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:30 am    Post subject: Zenith-List Digest: 5 Msgs - 10/05/09 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				GuysI have a couple of 100 hours in a Grumman Tiger and it is a slick airplane  and light on the controls. The Tiger could be used as a good transition but you fly the plane by the numbers and I do not have any time in a Zenith 601/650 to compare. I did some work in a Czech Sport Cruiser and the instructor that I used had also flown a 601xl and said the handling was very similar.The airplane I used is located in the DFW area.
 Floyd  
 From: "Doug - SportAviation" <Doug.Norman(at)sportaviation.aero>Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 11:34 AMTo: zenith-list(at)matronics.comSubject: RE: Re: Zenith-List Digest: 5 Msgs - 10/05/09--> Zenith-List message posted by: "Doug - SportAviation" I've been told that a Grumman is a close approximation. Even to thepitchiness.--
 
  |  | - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |