sandbag23(at)msn.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 3:43 pm    Post subject: MPG and time | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I've never done the math (just like I've never totaled my annual operating 
 costs) but this fits with my experience.  I always use the large-SUV analogy 
 when speaking to non-aviators.
 
 Unlike Gary's factor of 2.5 driving to flying time, I have found 3.0 to be 
 accurate.  Most likely that is due to my east coast flying where major roads 
 between any 2 cities are less common.  I have also been able to live within 
 a 5 minute drive to my airport.
 
 Again, afraid to do the math, but I plan to seriously re-evaluate my general 
 aviation activities when 100LL averages $5/gal.  Which entrepreneur is going 
 to invest in obtaining the MoGas STC for Tigers?
 
 -Brian
 N119ST
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   > At 11,000 ft, 2500 rpm, 123 kts    gets 16.0 mpg
  >
  >  At   6,000 ft, 2450 rpm, 123.5 kts  and 15.35 mpg   (interpolating)
  >
  >  4% worst mpg, same speed, but you would use more gas climbing the extra
  >  5,000 ft.
  >
  >  gil in Tucson
 
 | 	 
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  |