 |
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
shericom(at)rogers.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 12:40 pm Post subject: Grounding of fuel tanks |
|
|
Some weeks ago I saw discussions on grounding of the filler neck on the fiberglass fuel tanks (M4) to the rear spar with copper braid. My question is what size brade is required and how is it connected to the spar? I beleave it was soldered to the tank neck. Thanks in advance, Don
Don Stevenson, Caledon, Ontario, Canada
M4/1200-912s Speedster
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shericom(at)rogers.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 12:40 pm Post subject: Grounding of fuel tanks |
|
|
Some weeks ago I saw discussions on grounding of the filler neck on the fiberglass fuel tanks (M4) to the rear spar with copper braid. My question is what size brade is required and how is it connected to the spar? I beleave it was soldered to the tank neck. Thanks in advance, Don
Don Stevenson, Caledon, Ontario, Canada
M4/1200-912s Speedster
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
smokey_bear_40220(at)yaho Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:53 pm Post subject: Grounding of fuel tanks |
|
|
My understanding is that a small wire will do, since
it is static electricity. It is also a good idea to
include a resistor in line to the spar so that the
charge bleeds off more slowly and avoids the spark.
Don't know what the others have used. I would guess
equivelent to a #16 wire is plenty with a little 1/2
amp 1000 ohm resister? That may be overkill.
You need good electrical contact at both ends, but
don't solder to the AL spar. If there is a brace
nearby that is riveted to the spar, I'd drill a #30
into that and use a pop rivet to attach the wire with
a crimpon end. Run the wire somewhere where it is
supported and not going to break off with time.
Where are our electrical experts on this?
Kurt S. S-5/NSI turbo
--- Donald STEVENSON <shericom(at)rogers.com> wrote:
Quote: | Some weeks ago I saw discussions on grounding of the
filler neck on the fiberglass fuel tanks (M4) to the
rear spar with copper braid. My question is what
size brade is required and how is it connected to
the spar? I beleave it was soldered to the tank
neck. Thanks in advance, Don
Don Stevenson, Caledon, Ontario, Canada
M4/1200-912s Speedster
|
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pwmac(at)sisna.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 2:24 pm Post subject: Grounding of fuel tanks |
|
|
Electrically speaking a small wire will do the job. Hardly any
current is involved just a voltage potential. I used 16 ga because it
was handy. 22 ga would be ok. It is not like the wire braid between
your engine and the battery which carries hundreds of amps. The trick
is to keep the voltage the same between the filler neck and the
airframe. I connected mine to the spar. Then when fueling I use the
tie down attachment for the ground to earth.
Regards, Paul
At 02:39 PM 4/28/2006, you wrote:
Quote: |
Some weeks ago I saw discussions on grounding of the filler neck on
the fiberglass fuel tanks (M4) to the rear spar with copper braid.
My question is what size brade is required and how is it connected
to the spar? I beleave it was soldered to the tank neck. Thanks in advance, Don
Don Stevenson, Caledon, Ontario, Canada
M4/1200-912s Speedster
|
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lynn Matteson
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 2778 Location: Grass Lake, Michigan
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 3:42 pm Post subject: Grounding of fuel tanks |
|
|
That might have been me, Don. I used the Aircraft Spruce 1/4" tin
plated copper braid p/n 863, p.419. I attached it to the spar with a
ring terminal under a washer, then the spar attaching nut. I soldered
the braid to the filler neck, being careful to put it low enough to
clear the filler cap. I used a 200-watt soldering iron to do the job.
Lynn
On Friday, April 28, 2006, at 04:39 PM, Donald STEVENSON wrote:
Quote: |
<shericom(at)rogers.com>
Some weeks ago I saw discussions on grounding of the filler neck on
the fiberglass fuel tanks (M4) to the rear spar with copper braid. My
question is what size brade is required and how is it connected to the
spar? I beleave it was soldered to the tank neck. Thanks in advance,
Don
Don Stevenson, Caledon, Ontario, Canada
M4/1200-912s Speedster
|
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Lynn
Kitfox IV-Jabiru 2200
N369LM |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bnn(at)nethere.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 8:16 pm Post subject: Grounding of fuel tanks |
|
|
At 01:39 PM 4/28/2006, you wrote:
Quote: | Some weeks ago I saw discussions on grounding of the filler neck on the
fiberglass fuel tanks (M4) to the rear spar with copper braid. My question
is what size brade is required and how is it connected to the spar? I
beleave it was soldered to the tank neck. Thanks in advance,
|
Somewhat off topic. I didn't have the neck grounded, but recognized the
requirement. I now have a couple of electrical clamps with 15' of 14ga test
lead wire between them. On each clamp I've attached about a foot of light
chain. One chain goes in the tank during fill with the clamp on the filler
neck. The other clamp goes on the axle with the chain on the ground. I pour
a little water on the ground chain for additional contact. I'm hoping this
will get any static buildup on the gasoline surface to ground.
If I were going to go to the trouble of grounding the filler neck, I'd
attach a conductive chain from the filler neck long enough to reach the
bottom of the tank.
Guy Buchanan
K-IV 1200 / 582 / 99.9% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar.
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Michel

Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 966 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 10:58 pm Post subject: Grounding of fuel tanks |
|
|
On Apr 28, 2006, at 11:50 PM, kurt schrader wrote:
Quote: | Where are our electrical experts on this?
|
I am certainly not an expert but I can tell what I did to ground my ham
radio in my sailboat.
Don, I used a tape that is used to ground computer racks. I don't know
how easy it is to find them, I got mine from my employer who made
high-end maritime simulator with big huge racks full of electronic. The
tape is about half an inch wide and has adhesive on one side. It is
silver looking but it, I believed platted copper. I used it to go from
my antenna tuner, down into the bildges. Twelve years later, it still
works just fine, the adhesive is holding strong and my ham antenna
works well. I even had QSO with the US and Canada with as little as 5
Watts output.
Cheers,
Michel
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Kitfox 3 - Jabiru 2200 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
smokey_bear_40220(at)yaho Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:57 am Post subject: Grounding of fuel tanks |
|
|
Good one Michel,
Not only is the tape more easily hidden under fabric,
but it mounts firmly too. Can even be used for making
cheap antennas inside fabric airplanes where they
dont add drag.
Kurt S.
--- Michel Verheughe <michel(at)online.no> wrote:
Quote: | On Apr 28, 2006, at 11:50 PM, kurt schrader wrote:
> Where are our electrical experts on this?
I am certainly not an expert but I can tell what I
did to ground my ham radio in my sailboat.
Don, I used a tape that is used to ground computer
racks. I don't know
how easy it is to find them,>
Cheers,
Michel
|
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
smokey_bear_40220(at)yaho Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 4:33 am Post subject: Grounding of fuel tanks |
|
|
Hi Guy,
I was once working on my old RV (Rec Vehicle) and
happened to have the power supply plugged in. While
rolling under the vehicle I grabbed the step and got a
buzz. I took my volt meter and stuck one end in the
dirt gap between the concrete slabs and put the other
end on the RV. 40 volts AC! It was enough to go thru
me to the concrete. (Bad RV wiring somewhere)
Remembering that fuel trucks use chains, other trucks
use grounding straps, and planes have static wicks, I
think that they do work.
I bet your system is working too Guy.
The longest spark I saw from an aircraft, other than
lightening, was from a hovering helo. It was about 3
feet long and struck a man on the ground. Got his
attention and mine! I saw it from 200 yards away!
Kurt S.
--- Guy Buchanan <bnn(at)nethere.com> wrote:
Quote: | Somewhat off topic. I didn't have the neck grounded,
but recognized the
requirement. I now have a couple of electrical
clamps with 15' of 14ga test
lead wire between them. On each clamp I've attached
about a foot of light
chain. One chain goes in the tank during fill with
the clamp on the filler
neck. The other clamp goes on the axle with the
chain on the ground. I pour
a little water on the ground chain for additional
contact. I'm hoping this
will get any static buildup on the gasoline surface
to ground.
If I were going to go to the trouble of grounding
the filler neck, I'd
attach a conductive chain from the filler neck long
enough to reach the
bottom of the tank.
Guy Buchanan
K-IV 1200 / 582 / 99.9% done, thanks mostly to Bob
Ducar.
|
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
pwmac(at)sisna.com Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 7:22 am Post subject: Grounding of fuel tanks |
|
|
Kurt, good point Always ground the plane before starting the fueling
process. A built up charge may be present. One thing to remember is
that the first line of defense from static discharge during fueling
is that the fuel nozzle always be in contact with the tank inlet
during fueling. This practice is the reason that the planes that do
not have the filler neck grounded to the airframe have not had an
incident. This likewise applies to funnels whether conductive or not.
Never let the gasoline squirt into a vessel without contact between
the vessel and the source of the fuel. Example: do not pour fuel into
a funnel unless the Jerry can spout is in contact with the funnel.
Not sure the chain from the filler neck to bottom of the tank has
merit. This is because the static charge buildup is the result of the
liquid flowing thru the vapor above the liquid surface. Thus if there
is a ground path from the source (say a fill nozzle) to the flowing
stream there will not be arcing.
Regards, Paul
=====================
At 06:31 AM 4/29/2006, you wrote:
Quote: |
Hi Guy,
I was once working on my old RV (Rec Vehicle) and
happened to have the power supply plugged in. While
rolling under the vehicle I grabbed the step and got a
buzz. I took my volt meter and stuck one end in the
dirt gap between the concrete slabs and put the other
end on the RV. 40 volts AC! It was enough to go thru
me to the concrete. (Bad RV wiring somewhere)
Remembering that fuel trucks use chains, other trucks
use grounding straps, and planes have static wicks, I
think that they do work.
I bet your system is working too Guy.
The longest spark I saw from an aircraft, other than
lightening, was from a hovering helo. It was about 3
feet long and struck a man on the ground. Got his
attention and mine! I saw it from 200 yards away!
Kurt S.
--- Guy Buchanan <bnn(at)nethere.com> wrote:
> Somewhat off topic. I didn't have the neck grounded,
> but recognized the
> requirement. I now have a couple of electrical
> clamps with 15' of 14ga test
> lead wire between them. On each clamp I've attached
> about a foot of light
> chain. One chain goes in the tank during fill with
> the clamp on the filler
> neck. The other clamp goes on the axle with the
> chain on the ground. I pour
> a little water on the ground chain for additional
> contact. I'm hoping this
> will get any static buildup on the gasoline surface
> to ground.
>
> If I were going to go to the trouble of grounding
> the filler neck, I'd
> attach a conductive chain from the filler neck long
> enough to reach the
> bottom of the tank.
>
> Guy Buchanan
> K-IV 1200 / 582 / 99.9% done, thanks mostly to Bob
> Ducar.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
|
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
smokey_bear_40220(at)yaho Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:41 pm Post subject: Grounding of fuel tanks |
|
|
Glad you are keeping us straight Paul.
Without everything grounded, it probably is a good
idea to touch the can or hose to the unopened cap
first, then open the cap to fuel.
But I am counting on good looks and luck right now
myself. Too many things to make right and not enough
time to do them all, darn. Glad others learn this
stuff here before they build too far. I got here to
late to run the filler neck wire under the fabric.
Got to do make shift corrections until to-dos and
time come together.
Kurt S.
--- PWilson <pwmac(at)sisna.com> wrote:
Quote: | Kurt, good point Always ground the plane before
starting the fueling
process. A built up charge may be present. One
thing to remember is
that the first line of defense from static discharge
during fueling
is that the fuel nozzle always be in contact with
the tank inlet
during fueling. This practice is the reason that the
planes that do
not have the filler neck grounded to the airframe
have not had an
incident. This likewise applies to funnels whether
conductive or not.
Never let the gasoline squirt into a vessel without
contact between
the vessel and the source of the fuel. Example: do
not pour fuel into
a funnel unless the Jerry can spout is in contact
with the funnel.
Not sure the chain from the filler neck to bottom of
the tank has
merit. This is because the static charge buildup is
the result of the
liquid flowing thru the vapor above the liquid
surface. Thus if there
is a ground path from the source (say a fill nozzle)
to the flowing
stream there will not be arcing.
Regards, Paul
|
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bnn(at)nethere.com Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 10:42 pm Post subject: Grounding of fuel tanks |
|
|
At 05:31 AM 4/29/2006, you wrote:
Quote: | The longest spark I saw from an aircraft, other than
lightening, was from a hovering helo. It was about 3
feet long and struck a man on the ground. Got his
attention and mine! I saw it from 200 yards away!
|
Before Navy helicopters land on ship, they are first discharged with an 8'
wand connected via a huge cable to the ship. I've seen it.
Guy
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
janderson412(at)hotmail.c Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 11:21 pm Post subject: Grounding of fuel tanks |
|
|
Heli logging in dry weather just just on dusk, never seen 3ft but some
beauties all the same...those spinning blades certainly builsd up a
charge...can't help but smile looking down...
From: Guy Buchanan <bnn(at)nethere.com>
Reply-To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Grounding of fuel tanks
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:33:17 -0700
At 05:31 AM 4/29/2006, you wrote:
Quote: | The longest spark I saw from an aircraft, other than
lightening, was from a hovering helo. It was about 3
feet long and struck a man on the ground. Got his
attention and mine! I saw it from 200 yards away!
|
Before Navy helicopters land on ship, they are first discharged with an 8'
wand connected via a huge cable to the ship. I've seen it.
Guy
_________________________________________________________________
Need more speed? Get Xtra Broadband (at)
http://jetstream.xtra.co.nz/chm/0,,202853-1000,00.html
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rexjan(at)bigpond.com Guest
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 12:20 am Post subject: Grounding of fuel tanks |
|
|
As an electronics guy I will verify what Kurt says. I think the =
advantage of using braid over wire is only because the wire might break =
and braid is far less vulnerable so it's your choice. The resistor in =
the braid or wire is essential. The reason being that if the filler neck =
is hard earthed [ ie:- no resistor ] then if you have a static charge =
built up on the fuel container or perhaps you holding it then you get a =
zap and bang she could go. You could earth the container as well as the =
filler neck and you would be OK but if you use a resistor then any =
difference in voltage potential will promptly drain away rather than arc =
over. So this way you are pretty safe either way. ie:- earthing the can =
or not. Earthing the can as well as the neck would be the best preferece =
though but don't make the connection next to fumes. ie:- on the can neck =
with cap open.
Somebody did point this out basically before about the resistor. One =
small point though is the resistor should really be a bit higher in =
value than 1,000 ohms. At that you may still get a spark. I would =
suggest say 1/2 megohm [ 500,000 ohms ] It will still drain the voltage =
off virtually instantly but with no zap. Also I think kurt meant to =
quote watts rating for the resistor not amps. Virtually any wattage =
would be enough but I'd suggest 1 watt for something a bit more =
physically robust. In fact a good idea might be 2 only 1 megohm ones =
side by side. What we call connected in parallel. This gives 1/2 megohm =
that we were originally talking about but a built in safety factor =
should one fail either due to mechanical breakage or go electrically =
open circuit. In such a case we would be left with 1 megohm rather than =
1/2 megohm but it will still do the job just fine.
Rex Shaw
Australia.
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
smokey_bear_40220(at)yaho Guest
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:23 am Post subject: Grounding of fuel tanks |
|
|
Yes Guy,
I flew Marine CH-53s. 72 foot rotar span and a big
static machine. I think it was our primary weapon.
This occurance happened on the ground when a grunt
tried to show a helo team how to hook up without a
wand and learned a positive (or was it negative?)
lesson. I think he went about 20 feet including the
roll. Off fairway..... Unusuall for Marines - no
sand trap.
Kurt S.
Do not archive
--- Guy Buchanan <bnn(at)nethere.com> wrote:
Quote: | At 05:31 AM 4/29/2006, you wrote:
>The longest spark I saw from an aircraft, other
than
>lightening, was from a hovering helo. It was about
3
>feet long and struck a man on the ground. Got his
>attention and mine! I saw it from 200 yards away!
Before Navy helicopters land on ship, they are first
discharged with an 8'
wand connected via a huge cable to the ship. I've
seen it.
Guy
|
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
smokey_bear_40220(at)yaho Guest
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:25 am Post subject: Grounding of fuel tanks |
|
|
John,
Which type helo?
Kurt S.
do not archive
--- John Anderson <janderson412(at)hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote: | Heli logging in dry weather just just on dusk,
never seen 3ft but some
beauties all the same...those spinning blades
certainly builsd up a
charge...can't help but smile looking down...
|
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
smokey_bear_40220(at)yaho Guest
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 5:35 am Post subject: Grounding of fuel tanks |
|
|
Thanks Rex,
That is designing for longevity.
Ha ha... Yes watts! I am getting too old to think
about the "hard" stuff. Mega volts of static
should have that greater resistance too.
As a retrofit, I might try a metalic paint (design)
behind the filler neck and ground it to somewhere.
Have to test electrically first.... Might provide the
conductivity and resistance too. It will need good
contact points though. Just an idea. Thinking about
my fuel stains and 2 birds....
Kurt S.
--- Rex Shaw <rexjan(at)bigpond.com> wrote:
Quote: | As an electronics guy I will verify what Kurt says.
I think the =
advantage of using braid over wire is only because
the wire might break =
and braid is far less vulnerable so it's your
choice. The resistor in =
the braid or wire is essential. The reason being
that if the filler neck =
is hard earthed [ ie:- no resistor ] then if you
have a static charge =
built up on the fuel container or perhaps you
holding it then you get a =
zap and bang she could go. You could earth the
container as well as the =
filler neck and you would be OK but if you use a
resistor then any =
difference in voltage potential will promptly drain
away rather than arc =
over. So this way you are pretty safe either way.
ie:- earthing the can =
or not. Earthing the can as well as the neck would
be the best preferece =
though but don't make the connection next to fumes.
ie:- on the can neck =
with cap open.
Somebody did point this out basically before about
the resistor. One =
small point though is the resistor should really be
a bit higher in =
value than 1,000 ohms. At that you may still get a
spark. I would =
suggest say 1/2 megohm [ 500,000 ohms ] It will
still drain the voltage =
off virtually instantly but with no zap. Also I
think kurt meant to =
quote watts rating for the resistor not amps.
Virtually any wattage =
would be enough but I'd suggest 1 watt for something
a bit more =
physically robust. In fact a good idea might be 2
only 1 megohm ones =
side by side. What we call connected in parallel.
This gives 1/2 megohm =
that we were originally talking about but a built in
safety factor =
should one fail either due to mechanical breakage or
go electrically =
open circuit. In such a case we would be left with 1
megohm rather than =
1/2 megohm but it will still do the job just fine.
Rex Shaw
Australia.
|
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dan(at)azshowersolutions. Guest
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 7:19 am Post subject: Grounding of fuel tanks |
|
|
I recently got checked out in an LSA (Allegro 2000) and thought it was interesting to see grounding wire dragging the ground coming off of the main gear next to the wheels. It was the first time I have seen this having flown only C-172 & 152s. Is this a common practice and would it benefit doing the same on the Kitfoxes?
Dan,
Mesa
www.azshowersolutions.com/Kitfox1.html
Rex Shaw <rexjan(at)bigpond.com> wrote:
As an electronics guy I will verify what Kurt says. I think the =
advantage of using braid over wire is only because the wire might break =
and braid is far less vulnerable so it's your choice. The resistor in =
the braid or wire is essential. The reason being that if the filler neck =
is hard earthed [ ie:- no resistor ] then if you have a static charge =
built up on the fuel container or perhaps you holding it then you get a =
zap and bang she could go. You could earth the container as well as the =
filler neck and you would be OK but if you use a resistor then any =
difference in voltage potential will promptly drain away rather than arc =
over. So this way you are pretty safe either way. ie:- earthing the can =
or not. Earthing the can as well as the neck would be the best preferece =
though but don't make the connection next to fumes. ie:- on the can neck =
with cap open.
Somebody did point this out basically before about the resistor. One =
small point though is the resistor should really be a bit higher in =
value than 1,000 ohms. At that you may still get a spark. I would =
suggest say 1/2 megohm [ 500,000 ohms ] It will still drain the voltage =
off virtually instantly but with no zap. Also I think kurt meant to =
quote watts rating for the resistor not amps. Virtually any wattage =
would be enough but I'd suggest 1 watt for something a bit more =
physically robust. In fact a good idea might be 2 only 1 megohm ones =
side by side. What we call connected in parallel. This gives 1/2 megohm =
that we were originally talking about but a built in safety factor =
should one fail either due to mechanical breakage or go electrically =
open circuit. In such a case we would be left with 1 megohm rather than =
1/2 megohm but it will still do the job just fine.
Rex Shaw
Australia.
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
smokey_bear_40220(at)yaho Guest
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:27 am Post subject: Grounding of fuel tanks |
|
|
Hi Dan,
I think this was more common practice years ago, but
not so much now. I had forgotten all about them on
planes, but you are right. I do remember seeing them
on planes small and large.
I dont see any harm in it if the wire is kept far
enough from the wheel that it doesnt get trapped
underneath and torn of. This is not a primary ground,
but should be a good, simple backup.
kurt S.
--- Dan Billingsley <dan(at)azshowersolutions.com> wrote:
Quote: | I recently got checked out in an LSA (Allegro 2000)
and thought it was interesting to see grounding wire
dragging the ground coming off of the main gear next
to the wheels. It was the first time I have seen
this having flown only C-172 & 152s. Is this a
common practice and would it benefit doing the same
on the Kitfoxes?
Dan,
Mesa
www.azshowersolutions.com/Kitfox1.html
|
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
janderson412(at)hotmail.c Guest
|
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 12:03 pm Post subject: Grounding of fuel tanks |
|
|
Bell205 & 212 Kurt....Big blades ...smile..
From: kurt schrader <smokey_bear_40220(at)yahoo.com>
Reply-To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Grounding of fuel tanks
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 06:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
<smokey_bear_40220(at)yahoo.com>
John,
Which type helo?
Kurt S.
do not archive
--- John Anderson <janderson412(at)hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote: | Heli logging in dry weather just just on dusk,
never seen 3ft but some
beauties all the same...those spinning blades
certainly builsd up a
charge...can't help but smile looking down...
|
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_________________________________________________________________
Need a new job? Check out XtraMSN Careers http://xtramsn.co.nz/careers
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|