ggower_99(at)yahoo.com
Guest
|
 Posted: Sun May 14, 2006 12:04 pm Post subject: Pretend you have two sets of wings, the standard CH 701 and |
 |
|
Based on one thing that I follow as fact since my first project 20 years ago:
"In any airplane you build, only add simplicity and lightness..."
I will keep the CH 701. wings hands off
I have only about 25 hrs flying my 701 and realy happy with it 87 MPH cruise indicated (at) 5,100 rpm Warp Drive
Practicing to land it short, a step at a time so I dont brake it 
I will also like to see some first hand facts about the Pegastol... only read and heard "someone told me in a flyin" facts of the Pegstol wing, sorry. Nothing against or in favor from my side.
Saludos
Gary Gower
701 912S
Flying from Chapala, Mexico.
PS. I think Mr Heintz is the Master of Simplicty and Lighness in aluminum airplane building.
Christopher Hazlitt <chrishazlitt(at)yahoo.com> wrote:
Pretend you have two sets of wings, the standard CH 701 and the Pegastol, both are perfect and ready to instal... which would you choose?
Any real world numbers of performance between the two wings?
---------------------------------
| | - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|
Get Email Distribution Too!
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
