  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		CloudCraft(at)aol.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 9:35 am    Post subject: Advice from Gear-Heads... LOP | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				In a message dated 23-May-06 10:00:19 Pacific Daylight Time, n395v(at)hughes.net 
 writes:
 At the risk of generating spirited debate and controversy here is something 
 for you big bore turboed gear heads to consider.
 
 [/img]
 
 I have never been a proponent of LOP solely for fuel savings but given $4/gal 
 is probably here to stay it has moved up on my list of reasons to operate LOP.
 <><><><><><><><><>
 
 Dr. Milt, you're a muck raker!
 
 I was (and in theory still am) a LOP guy but it was an interview I did last 
 millennium with Suburban Air Freight of Omaha, Nebraska -- an AC-680-FL fleet 
 operator -- who changed my mind.
 
 Their reason for running ROP was not about cylinder head temperature nor any 
 of the usual heat or oil wash reasons: it was because of the low lead content 
 in modern AvGas.
 
 They saw a problem with valve guide lubrication that lead was intended to 
 provide in these engines.
 
 So, in the controversial spirit of cheapness, how much is one saving LOP vs. 
 other engine wear costs?
 
 I don't know the answer and I think it depends on how many hours a year one 
 operates.  A recreational operator with one airplane has a different economic 
 urge than a fleet operator who is trying to make money by flying a bunch of 
 airplanes.
 
 Wing Commander Gordon
 
 Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere.
 
  |  | - The Matronics Commander-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		BobsV35B(at)aol.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 10:27 am    Post subject: Advice from Gear-Heads... LOP | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Good Afternoon Commander Gordon,  
 
 My understanding is that the FAA ran some tests of leaded against non  leaded 
 fuel. Rumor has it that it was some model of Aero Commander, but I do not  
 know which one. 
  
 In any case, one engine was ran on leaded fuel and the other on nonleaded  
 fuel.  The only difference at overhaul time was that the engine that was  run on 
 nonleaded fuel was a lot cleaner.  There was no measurable  difference in 
 wear. 
  
 There are just as many engine experts who will tell you that the idea of  
 lead being needed by any of our engines to lubricate the valves, or anything  
 else, is pure unadulterated rubbish, as there are ones who swear the lead is  
 needed.
  
 The FAA may not have said it in just those words, but it was pretty strong  
 statement.
  
 Most of the folks who claim the engine needs the lead tend to be old time  
 mechanics and engine rebuilders rather than trained engineers.
  
 Do you know of any scientific evaluation that shows things differently than  
 did the FAA tests?
  
 I once read an article by a gentleman who claimed to be the engineer who  
 developed Ethyl gasoline. It was his statement that the lead was a necessary  
 evil to get the octane up at low cost. It did nothing for the engine other than  
 change the octane and it was detrimental other than that.
  
 If anyone is interested in reading one pilot's take on engine operations,  
 they might want to check through John Deakin's article for his series on engine  
 management.
  
 Try: _http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182146-1.html_ 
 (http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182146-1.html) 
  
 Happy  Skies,
 
 Old Bob
 AKA
 Bob Siegfried
 Ancient Aviator
 Stearman  N3977A
 Brookeridge Air Park LL22
 Downers Grove, IL 60516
 630  985-8503
 
  
 In a message dated 5/23/2006 12:38:26 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
 CloudCraft(at)aol.com writes:
 Their reason for running ROP was not about cylinder head  temperature nor any 
 of the usual heat or oil wash reasons: it was because  of the low lead 
 content 
 in modern AvGas.
 
 They saw a problem with  valve guide lubrication that lead was intended to 
 provide in these  engines.
 
 So, in the controversial spirit of cheapness, how much is one  saving LOP vs. 
 other engine wear costs?
 
  |  | - The Matronics Commander-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		CloudCraft(at)aol.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 11:00 am    Post subject: Advice from Gear-Heads... LOP | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				In a message dated 23-May-06 11:27:46 Pacific Daylight Time, BobsV35B(at)aol.com 
 writes:
 Most of the folks who claim the engine needs the lead tend to be old time  
 mechanics and engine rebuilders rather than trained engineers.
 
 Do you know of any scientific evaluation that shows things differently than  
 did the FAA tests?
 <><><><><><><><><>
 
 Old Bob,
 
 As a friend of mine, since gone West, used to say, "It's either very loose 
 science or very tight magic."
 
 The only science these guys had was operational experience on a fleet of 
 Lycoming IGSO-540s over a long period of time, and their opinion on what kept the 
 engines on the airplane and not in the shop.
 
 Their valve guide problems could have been something else entirely, but they 
 had their belief in what caused and fixed it.
 
 The man I interviewed was Jay Armstrong (Jay Armstrong at 402-344-4100) and I 
 just called him to make sure I either didn't misquote him or if he's changed 
 his mind since 1999, but he's not in today.
 
 Rats!
 
 Wing Commander Gordon
 
 Life is not simple anywhere. Probably less so elsewhere.
 
  |  | - The Matronics Commander-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		barry.collman(at)air-brit Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 11:15 am    Post subject: Advice from Gear-Heads... LOP | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Hi All,
 
 The FAA did indeed run some tests of leaded against non-leaded fuel.
 
 They were conducted, although I cannot say if it was exclusively, using their 
 Aero Commander 680E, s/n 818-62, N50, in 1999.
 
 Very Best Regards,
 Barry C.
 
 ---
 
  |  | - The Matronics Commander-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		BillLeff1(at)aol.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 12:14 pm    Post subject: Advice from Gear-Heads... LOP | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Charles F. Kettering (of Dayton Ohio) invented the use of Tetra Ethyl  Lead 
 in gasoline. He is long dead!
  
 Bill Leff
 
  |  | - The Matronics Commander-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		BillLeff1(at)aol.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 12:25 pm    Post subject: Advice from Gear-Heads... LOP | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I have been flying and maintaining IGSO-540's in Commanders since  1970.  The 
 only thing that keeps cylinders from failing is 50GPH at cuise!  That 
 generally works out to 50 deg. ROP.
  
 Heat is the issue. I do not have the same problem on my 560F with  IGO-540's. 
 I have been flying that specific airplane since 1973. 
  
 Bill Leff
 
  |  | - The Matronics Commander-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Commander-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |