Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Low voltage indicator with dual alternators

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jul 06, 2013 5:31 am    Post subject: Low voltage indicator with dual alternators Reply with quote

Quote:
I have the same setup and that's how it works. That is, the low
voltage light simply monitors the voltage on the buss independent of
alternator operation. Given that, I've wondered how a failed
alternator would manifest itself.

What architecture are we talking about? Z-12 or Z-14?
With independent busses for each alternator, the two
systems are normally operated with the cross-feed OPEN.
Each LV montior will tell the condition of it's respective
bus.

With Z-12 where the aux alternator is paired with a
Standby Regulator, the aux alternator is operated
with the switch ON but with the lower set-point for
the SB regulator voltage, the aux alternator normally
'runs' in a relaxed state.

If the main alternator is shut down for any reason,
bus voltage sags and the SB regulator wakes up the aux
alternator. If system loads are equal to or less than
aux alternator capability, then the lv light will not
come on but the AUX ALT LOADED indicator light will
come on. If system loads are too great for the aux
alternator, the AUX ALT LOADED light flashes to prompt
reduction in load.

If Z-12 with LR3C regulators, you would normally run
with the aux alternator OFF and turn it on only when
prompted by a LV warning . . . from either regulator
having a warning light installed.

Quote:
- If failure was due to an overvoltage situation, the breaker would
pop. Since I normally fly with the 2 busses interconnected

Not recommended.

Quote:
I would expect the low voltage lights to remain off perhaps for
the remainder of the flight. If one did come on because buss
voltage dropped below the threshold, I would expect both to come on
more or less simultaneously as long as the busses were
interconnected. The only explicit indication of Alt failure would
be the popped OV breaker.

The design goals for Z-14 were two-fold. (1)
being able to parallel batteries for engine
cranking and (2) being able to share power between
systems in the event of an alternator failure.

As you have deduced, running them in parallel
during normal operations has the potential for
obscuring failure of one of the alternators.

Quote:
- Are there other modes of Alternator failure where there would be
no explicit indication of failure? I'm thinking that a snapped belt
would be an example. If loads and battery condition were such that
the interconnected buss voltage stayed above the low volt threshold,
there would be no explicit indication. Is that right?

Yes. Another reason for running them independently
of each other for normal flight ops. With the crossfeed
closed, you have a Z-12 with dual batteries. Unless
one alternator is configured for stand-by operation by
incorporation of the appropriate regulator, then you
have two alternators in a paralleled mode of operation
controlled by regulators not designed for paralleling
(current management) of the two alternators.

If you want to do this, then set the aux alternator
regulator down by about 1 volt so that it stays 'relaxed'
for normal ops.
Bob . . .


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Mauledriver(at)nc.rr.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 8:59 am    Post subject: Low voltage indicator with dual alternators Reply with quote

On 7/6/2013 9:31 AM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III wrote:
Quote:

<nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com>
> I have the same setup and that's how it works. That is, the low
> voltage light simply monitors the voltage on the bus independent of
> alternator operation. Given that, I've wondered how a failed
> alternator would manifest itself.

What architecture are we talking about? Z-12 or Z-14?
With independent buses for each alternator, the two
systems are normally operated with the cross-feed OPEN.
Each LV montior will tell the condition of it's respective
bus.
It's a Z-14

Quote:


> - If failure was due to an overvoltage situation, the breaker would
> pop. Since I normally fly with the 2 buses interconnected

Not recommended.
I see what you mean.

Quote:

> I would expect the low voltage lights to remain off perhaps for the
> remainder of the flight. If one did come on because bus voltage
> dropped below the threshold, I would expect both to come on more or
> less simultaneously as long as the buses were interconnected. The
> only explicit indication of Alt failure would be the popped OV breaker.

The design goals for Z-14 were two-fold. (1)
being able to parallel batteries for engine
cranking and (2) being able to share power between
systems in the event of an alternator failure.

As you have deduced, running them in parallel
during normal operations has the potential for
obscuring failure of one of the alternators.
My operational goals for the Z-14 included being able to run much of the

panel on one battery while still having a fully charged battery for
starting. The idea being that I wanted to be able to enter flight plans
and even check weather before engine start. That's worked out well. I
can connect the buses for starts if needed and that works well as well.
However, I normally start with the buses separated because if I go
parallel, the voltage drop causes my 3 MDFs to re-boot.
Quote:

> - Are there other modes of Alternator failure where there would be no
> explicit indication of failure? I'm thinking that a snapped belt
> would be an example. If loads and battery condition were such that
> the interconnected bus voltage stayed above the low volt threshold,
> there would be no explicit indication. Is that right?

Yes. Another reason for running them independently
of each other for normal flight ops. With the crossfeed
closed, you have a Z-12 with dual batteries. Unless
one alternator is configured for stand-by operation by
incorporation of the appropriate regulator, then you
have two alternators in a paralleled mode of operation
controlled by regulators not designed for paralleling
(current management) of the two alternators.

I'll be going back to running independent. I know what got me started

running with the buses interconnected but I lost track of what this
robust configuration is designed to do.

Thanks Bob!


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group