Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Lithium Ferrous Batteries

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 9:30 am    Post subject: Lithium Ferrous Batteries Reply with quote

At 09:48 PM 7/17/2013, you wrote:

Bob, I've been a customer of Pegasus Auto Racing for a few years now. I started out buying silicon radiator hose from them, they sent a catalog and I found quite a few aircraft related items and their prices are certainly no worse than Spruce so if they have the item I need I usually get it from them. This is by way of saying they are a good solid business.
When I received their latest catalog I noticed that they are carrying the Ballistic Performance EV02 line of Lithium Ferrous batteries.
https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/group.asp?GroupID=BALLISTICEVO2


What I don't get is that they spec them by number of cells. >From my limited understanding I would expect that the 2 cell battery would put out ~3 volts on each cell being something like an A123 size lithium battery of ~1.5 volts.
Flying an electrically dependant engine on my trike, the little HKS 700 has CDI ignitions but they are not powered separately like the Rotax, I have been thinking of a winter project of adding one of these:

The lithium cells deliver energy at about 3v
per cell . . .

http://tinyurl.com/la8nhr6

Hence, a 12v battery is made up of an array of 4
cells. Larger capacity batteries will add increments
of 4 cells in parallel.

https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/productdetails.asp?RecID=9402
as a reserve battery just for the ignition. I don't fly IFR or nights and rarely more than a half hour from an airport so 8 amp hours looks to give me at least an hour of reserve to get me to a safe touch down with power to spare. At 15 oz. the wires to hook it up would almost outweigh the battery. Have you ever heard of them?

I've seen this product offered by various vendors
for several years. Not heard anything 'unhappy'
about them. I note that this series of batteries
have multi-conductor service connectors on them.
This suggests that they offer a specially maintenance
tool for charging and testing the battery.,

For the guys who are using PC680's this battery;
https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/productdetails.asp?RecID=9404
seems to offer a lot of performance for 2.5 lb and the price doesn't reflect the usual "aircraft mark up".
Here is the company's web page and I've attached their instructions and warranty information.
http://www.ballisticparts.com/products/batteries/batteries.php
Does this all make sense or is it so much hokus pokus?

Without a doubt, these batteries perform
as advertised. So did the batteries in the
787.

The uncertainty about this an all lithium products
contemplated for use in vehicles is their plug-n-play
compatibility with SVLA batteries. Do a google search
on 'lithium motorcycle battery' . . .

http://tinyurl.com/kpkjqv3

A number of these products feature battery maintenance
connectors for attaching a specialized tool. Yet
NONE of the advertising hype speaks to the value
or requirement for this connector and the tool that
attaches there. I think the Boeing 787 battery has
become one of the world's most monitored (and
pampered) battery with maintenance/monitor wires
attached to every cell.

Herein lies my discomfort. If these products were
truly plug-n-play replacement for Ni-Cad and/or
SLVA, then this maintenance connector would not
exist, nor anything like a lithium-specific charger.

We see a similar thing with battery charging offers
from the likes of Schumacher with their battery
selector switches labeled SLVA, Flooded, Gel-Cell,
Deep Cycle, etc etc.

Bottom line is that the electrical systems in our
airplanes DO NOT feature mulit-conductor maintenance
connectors that mate with the smart connector on
this or any lithium product.

Nor do our regulators feature any selector switch
for tailoring system performance to SVLA, flooded,
deep cycle, -OR- LITHIUM batteries.

I cannot tell you that I KNOW and UNDERSTAND the
suitability of any of these lithium products for
use on your airplane. I do see unexplained features
unique to the lithium battery manufacturing and
marketing that suggests the batteries are not
drop-in, plug-n-play replacements for the legacy
SLVA battery.

I DO know that SVLA batteries have a comforting
track record and they do not go into fits of
failure or fire when MILDLY abused by the vagaries
of conditions encountered in millions of vehicles
not the least of which are airplanes.

Some years back I was motivated to withhold my
recommendation for installing un-modified, internally
regulated alternators. So too must I be circumspect
about the lithium batteries in airplanes. There
was never an argument with a stock automotive alternator's
ability to perform as advertised. I DID KNOW and UNDERSTAND
their inherent failure modes. Similarly can we
expect the lithium products to be as energetic and
light weight as they claim. In this instance my
reservations are based upon what I DON'T KNOW about
the batteries . . . (1) and NOBODY KNOWS about their historical performance in airplanes . . . their history is a tiny fraction of that we understand about SVLA. (2) Should we be considering some new regulator design that plugs into the maintenance connector on these batteries? (3) I do know that early drop-in replacements for SVLA proposed on biz-jets INCLUDED internal battery monitoring and maintenance electronics. (4)If Boeing finds value in doing it, should we adopt the philosophy? Take one of these batteries apart . . .

[img]cid:7.1.0.9.0.20130719122934.03c895a8(at)aeroelectric.com.2[/img]

. . . and you find something like this inside.

[img]cid:7.1.0.9.0.20130719122934.03c895a8(at)aeroelectric.com.3[/img]

If the suppliers of lithium products onto my grandson's helicopter
find value in perhaps doubling the price of a toy battery
to shepherd it's life in the consumer wild, how is it
that other lithium products can be offered into
operating conditions that are at least as abusive
if not more so?

In the best of all worlds, somebody would finance an
investigative activity into the claims for plug-n-play
capabilities of lithium products onto airplanes.
At the present state of my knowledge, I haven't got a clue.


Bob . . .


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List



2b228909.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  42.11 KB
 Viewed:  819 Time(s)

2b228909.jpg



2b228919.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  80.53 KB
 Viewed:  819 Time(s)

2b228919.jpg


Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group