 |
Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MichaelGibbs(at)cox.net
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 7:55 am Post subject: Sport Pilot vs. LSA (was: Aircraft Bill of Sale) |
 |
|
Steve sed:
| Quote: | > > You won't find the term "Gross weight" used, or implied, anywhere by
> > the FAA in regards to LSA issues. Period.
|
To which I replied:
| Quote: | > What does that have to do with the discussion, Steve? Just want to
> beat that dead horse or yours some more?
|
To which Leonard sez:
| Quote: | Take a look at your original post, you pasted it.. Steve was just
try to help clarify something YOU posted.
|
The original issue was whether or not a sport pilot is limited to
operating airplanes certificated as LSAs and the answer is no, they
can fly any type of airplane that meets the performance limitations.
I listed the performance limitations. I didn't mention "gross
weight" and the FAA doesn't mention "gross weight". Why was it
necessary for Steve to point out what wasn't mentioned? They also
don't mention what type of upholstery the plane has, did you want to
bring that up as well?
| Quote: | I am still amazed that people like you have to argue over something
they were told, not what is in black and white, in the government
publication, right in front of you and about 3rd grade comprehension
level.
|
People like me? I quoted the FAA directly from the docket and
provided a link to the FAA's web site. I did not argue with anyone
nor did I rely on hearsay. Apparently your reading comprehension
fell a bit short.
I am taking Steve to task simply because he has a long history of
harping on the "gross weight" versus "maximum takeoff weight" issue
and he decided to hijack this topic to bring up his pet peeve again.
I don't care what kind of airplane he flies or what type of license
he uses to do so, but if he encourages others to follow his
interpretation of the rules and they suffer from the process Paul
describes (i.e., "... it is a rare case to have a board of review not
agree with the government agency...") he is culpable.
Mike G.
N728KF
Phoenix, AZ
| | - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eskflyer
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 44
Location: AK
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 8:21 am Post subject: Re: Sport Pilot vs. LSA (was: Aircraft Bill of Sale) |
|
|
Hell im takin the 5th on this one and drinking it to forget all the bull . Yes it is relevant to the subject of LSA aircraft and if you use the directive as written then many more aircraft are available to pilots who fly in the lsa aircraft category. If the Faa wrote it wrong then that is there fault and no one can argue until it is rewritten and made law .
Steve has a great point and im stickin to it .
DO not archive
Sig to follow below
| | - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________
FLY FUN FLY LOW FLY SLOW
John Perry
Kitfox 2 N718PD
582 cbox 2:62-1 IVO IFA
1220 Full Lotus |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
Get Email Distribution Too!
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
