  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		Discover
 
 
  Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 429
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:42 am    Post subject: Vne at altitude TAS or IAS? | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Gil and others,
   
  My last email citing Fred Kokaska was from the  middle of a discussion on Vne at altitude, the subject Gil brought up. I would  be interested in learning more. An article I recieved from Van's started me  worrying about the potential for exceeding Vne at altitude in my Sabre Toothed  Tiger http://www.vansaircraft.com/pdf/hp_limts.pdf
   
  Being that the Tiger certified service ceiling  is 13,800 and the potential for the 260hp Tiger to go much higher, the article  caused me some concern. Especially thinking of making an emergency fast  descent from say 20,000' and whether the Indicated Air Speed on the Air Speed  Indicator would keep me from breaking the Vne....or actually causing a  structural failiure.
   
  I forwarded the article to Ron Levy asking for  his input and he had a good regulations oriented answer and suggested I contact  Kokaska to see how the IO540 STC was stipulated as far as Vne was concerned when  he achieved his STC...you saw part of Fred's answer to me. Between what  Fred and Ron said I concluded not to worry. Here is what Ron said  :
   
   
 Ned: 
   
 The article is correct  in theory.  However, per 14 CFR 23.1545(c), “If VNE or  VNO vary with altitude, there must be means to indicate to the pilot  the appropriate limitations throughout the operating altitude range.”   Therefore, for an aircraft to be certified in the Standard airworthiness  category, either the published VNE is valid up to the book service  ceiling, or this issue would have to be addressed.  Further, to obtain an  STC with a bigger engine, the expanded envelope would have to be addressed or a  limitation noted.  You might ask Fred Kokaska if this was covered when they  developed the STC. 
   
 Ron 
 In addition to what I  quoted earlier Fred also said: Hello Ron and Ned
  Well I read Mr. Krueger's article. I began having  problems with his logic early on when he started by describing the markings on  the airspeed indicator. He refers to Va , the design maneuvering speed as the  "blue line" on the air speed indicator. Wow, that's news to me as Va is not  required and never shown as a "limit"on the airspeed indicator.  Multi-engine aircraft have an airspeed indicator blue line which represents Vyse  (best single engine rate-of-climb speed).
  The writer lost a few points right  there.........
  
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   In CFR Part 23 certification the term TAS is never  defined, recognized or addressed.  They have V speed numbers for everything  but all testing, structural flight testing, climb/cooling flight testing are all  related to IAS.
  They will require a correction chart be developed  for installation error of the pitot tube so that test result data is really  based on CAS after observed temp and installation errors are accounted  for.
 | 	  
  A manufacturer of a new design must define and  demonstrate (Vd) (Dive speed as part of the overall envelope) After  demonstrating a dive at Vd the FAA established Vne (AA5B 174 KCAS) as 90%  of demonstrated Vd (FAA takes away 10% as a safety factor) . I went through the  Vne part of certification at 100% of Vne for an AA5B (174 KIAS), There were  two Part 23 objectives in this flight test (flown by FAA test pilot)  of verifying the prop does not overspeed (above 2700 RPM) at Vne. This was easy  as the back stop in the CS prop would probably allow 220 KIAS before it ran out  of pitch. On a fixed pitch prop this can be a show stopper and require reducing  Vne to prevent the overspeed. The other was pitch and roll control and  airframe vibration.  The test pilot started at 10 K feet and pushed over at  full power to establish 174 KIAS, did some 30 degree left and right rolling  maneuvers. He commented (and I looked out the right side) on the fact the  ailerons were both about 2 inches above the normal even with the flap position  in level flight from airloads. While this looks spooky, he noticed no binding or  control input problems that he did not like.
  So, to answer your question .... I have never seen  any reference to the term "TAS" in any certification requirement. 
  Sombody ought to follow up with the FAA to get the  right A/S marking in the 2400 Lb Cheetahs that have the AA5B spar installed.  They approved AA5B airspeed markings for the spar upgrade in Peter Otten's  IO-360 STC so you have an approved example.
   
  Cheers   Fred  Kokaska  
   
   
   
  What do you  think,?
  Ned
 
    [quote][b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		az_gila
 
 
  Joined: 17 Jun 2006 Posts: 99 Location: Tucson, AZ
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 12:05 pm    Post subject: Vne at altitude TAS or IAS? | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Quote: | 	 		  ....... 
  Ron
  
  In addition to what I quoted earlier Fred also said:
  Hello Ron and Ned
  Well I read Mr. Krueger's article. I began having problems with his logic early on when he started by describing the markings on the airspeed indicator. He refers to Va , the design maneuvering speed as the "blue line" on the air speed indicator. Wow, that's news to me as Va is not required and never shown as a "limit"on the airspeed indicator. Multi-engine aircraft have an airspeed indicator blue line which represents Vyse (best single engine rate-of-climb speed).
  The writer lost a few points right there......... | 	  
 
  Don't knock any points off here...
 
  The article was written by one Van for his own customers (RV builders and owners), and Van does make a big deal of the Va speed since it is relatively easy to damage a RV with the stick at normal cruise speeds...
 
  All of the airspeed indicators Van sells DO have a blue line on them... 
 
  Just consider who the article was written for, and the fact that RVs do not have to meet "standard" FAA stuff...
 
  Ken Krueger is part of Vans Technical Support staff...
 
   http://www.vansaircraft.com/public/pers-gen.htm
 
  gil A    [quote][b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |