  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		slyck(at)frontiernet.net Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:18 pm    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Grant, I'll reply to one of your questions......
 On 16, Mar 2008, at 8:33 PM, grantr wrote:
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
  Is it ok to hold the tail on the ground until rotation speed?
 
 Just once I tried the old "jump takeoff" technique I used on the  
 | 	  
 Aeronca 11AC
 with my MkIII. -Stick hard back to liftoff.  Not a good method.
 Let the plane lighten up on its own and fly off when it feels like it.
 This is, of course, with stock aluminum legs.  It might be a  
 different plane
 with long legs.
 BB
 
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland. Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:32 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				"grantr" wrote: << He has military headsets and 1 GA headset. I have
 comtronic which is not compatable. I bought a cord thats suppose to
 adapt the GA headset to my comtronics.  The head set works but the GA
 mic doesnt work. >>
 
 Hi, Grant -
 
 Military headsets and civilian GA headsets operate with different
 impedance levels - that is why the military sets won't work with our GA
 intercoms.
 
 And the Comtronics intercom will only work with Comtronics headsets.  I
 know this, because I have a set (2 helmets w/built-in headsets and
 intercom).  After I finished my initial 40 hours of flight testing, I no
 longer used the helmet, and began using a regular GA headset.  I found
 that it would not work with the Comtronics intercom box.  Like you, I
 purchased (from Comtronics) a patch cord that interfaced between my GA
 headset and the intercom, but my GA headsets STILL did not work.  Just
 like you said, you can hear, but the mike does not work.  
 
 When I called Comtronics to ask them why, they revealed to me that
 because of impedance differences between their headsets and GA headsets,
 the Comtronics intercom is not compatible with GA headsets.  ("Great," I
 thought - "why couldn't they have told me this BEFOREhand?")  At least
 they refunded me my $45 for the patch cord.
 
 My solution was to simply buy a regular GA intercom box.
 
 Dennis Kirby
 Mark-3, 912ul, Powerfin-72 in
 Cedar Crest, NM
 do not archive
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Dana
 
  
  Joined: 13 Dec 2007 Posts: 1047 Location: Connecticut, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:35 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 12:27 PM 3/17/2008, Kirby, Dennis CTR USAF AFMC MDA/AL wrote:
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  And the Comtronics intercom will only work with Comtronics headsets...
 because of impedance differences between their headsets and GA headsets,
 the Comtronics intercom is not compatible...
 
 | 	  
 Funny, though, my Comtronics helmet works perfectly with my Icom A24 radio, 
 which also supposedly works with GA headsets.
 
 -Dana
 
 --
   "640K of computer memory ought to be enough for anybody." - Bill Gates, 1981
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		John Hauck
 
  
  Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 4639 Location: Titus, Alabama (hauck's holler)
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:06 pm    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				> I have had a few good comments and tips. Does anyone else want to chime 
 in? Come on guys i know you all have some sort of technique.  
 Grant:
 
 I don't think there is any "special" techinique to fly a Kolb.
 
 I think the name of the game is to fly the aircraft and not let the aircraft 
 fly you.
 
 Using 40 degrees of flaps, idle power, to shoot an approach is not 
 technically demanding.  Got to keep the aircraft above stall speed with 
 enough speed at the bottom to do a little flare and touch down.  No need to 
 adjust flaps, throttle, or anything else except the control stick.  If you 
 need to go faster, push the stick forward, if you want to slow up, pull it 
 back.  The approach will be steep, much steeper than other airplanes, more 
 like a rotary wing approach and landing.
 
 If you were shooting a landing into a postage stamp field, use a little 
 throttle to help you hit your mark.  I can do this and keep my left hand on 
 the throttle and my right hand on the stick.  I am not busy moving my hand 
 from one control to another.  Keep it simple.  It is a very simple aircraft. 
 Why make it complex?
 
 Kolbs fly like any other three axis aircraft.  The pilot must make the 
 proper decision to control the aircraft and not vice versa.
 
 If you want to do full stall landings, do them a few inches above the 
 ground, not 10 feet.  If you want to do a wheel landing, fly the darn thing 
 onto the ground.
 
 I flew a Legend Cub the other day with a 100 hp tractor engine.  Darn thing 
 landed just like my Kolb MKIII.  Granted, it did float a little more, but 
 basically I controlled it basically the same way.  I very seldom fly any 
 other aircraft except Kolbs.
 
 john h
 mkIII
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ John Hauck
 
MKIII/912ULS
 
hauck's holler
 
Titus, Alabama | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Dana
 
  
  Joined: 13 Dec 2007 Posts: 1047 Location: Connecticut, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:32 pm    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 09:03 PM 3/18/2008, John Hauck wrote:
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  I flew a Legend Cub the other day with a 100 hp tractor engine.  Darn 
 thing landed just like my Kolb MKIII.  Granted, it did float a little 
 more, but basically I controlled it basically the same way.
 
 | 	  
 Interesting, when I flew my US for the first time I thought it handled very 
 much like the T-Craft I used to own (and, pleasantly, NOT like the Quick I 
 had recently been flying).  The biggest difference was that slips in the 
 T-Craft actually _did_ something.
 
 I wonder, has anybody ever added flapperons to an UltraStar?
 
 -Dana
 
 
 --
   "You sure it's broken?  Let me make sure..."
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		gaman(at)att.net Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 4:45 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Just a thought here;
 On takeoff in the Firestar,I have always begun the roll with stick back and held it here until the wheels lifted then slowly eased the stick forward to  hold the speed and  angle of climb desired.Everyone who has flown it was instructed this way .It's like a soft field  takeoff and always gives the shortest takeoff roll.
 
 ---
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		John Hauck
 
  
  Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 4639 Location: Titus, Alabama (hauck's holler)
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:00 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Gary A:
   
  Had to sit here a minute to think how I  made my normal takeoffs.
   
  Usually, depending on the airstrip, I keep the  throttle centered, when the tail starts up, I keep it level, at flying speed a  little aft stick, and we are flying.  At Lakeland and Oshkosh, we usually  pick up a main wheel a little early to coax the aircraft into flying a little  early.
   
  john h
  mkIII
   
   
  [quote]    On takeoff in the Firestar,I have always    begun the roll with stick back and held it here until the wheels lifted then    slowly eased the stick forward to  hold the speed and  angle of    climb desired.Everyone who has flown it was instructed this way .It's like a    soft field  takeoff and always gives the shortest takeoff roll.
  
 [b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ John Hauck
 
MKIII/912ULS
 
hauck's holler
 
Titus, Alabama | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		John Hauck
 
  
  Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 4639 Location: Titus, Alabama (hauck's holler)
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:27 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Morning Gang:
   
   "Usually, depending on the airstrip, I keep  the throttle centered, when the tail starts up, I"
   
   
  Naw, I don't keep the throttle centered on takeoff,  I keep the control stick centered, but I do have the throttle WAO.    
   
  john h
  mkIII
    [quote][b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ John Hauck
 
MKIII/912ULS
 
hauck's holler
 
Titus, Alabama | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		by0ung(at)brigham.net Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:55 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I’m Open for an education here…  but I was told that the shortest take off roll, at least from a hard surface,  was to get the tail up after adding power,  and this would allow you to accelerate faster because of reduced drag on the wing,  then pull the stick back when up to take off speed.  I have done testing,  taking off clean, 20 & 40 Deg flaps.   Both clean and 40 deg flaps had , as close as I could tell, the same takeoff roll,   and 20 deg flaps was 50 to 100 ft shorter.    The explanation was that even though 40 deg of flaps should allow you to fly slower because of greater lift,   the extra drag caused a much slower acceleration.   Now I can hear you thinking between the lines…   if 40 was slower why not 20 Deg of flaps being shorter as well….   The explanation would be that if you chart the lift to drag ratio on a chart,,,,   20 deg of flaps produces quite a bit of added lift with only a small drag penalty,,,  while 40 deg of flaps, while producing a little more lift than 20 deg,  is affected by much higher drag  ratio.  In getting a tail dragger endorsement in a supper cub,, the shortest takeoff was starting with 10 deg flaps,  getting the tail up to reduce drag on the wings then, at the same time,  pulling the stick back while adding additional flaps.  Again this if from a hard surface runway,,,,   soft field takeoff would be quite different.  
    
 Boyd   
    
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.  
 Just a thought here;
 | 	  
  On takeoff in the Firestar,I have always begun the roll with stick back and held it here until the wheels lifted then slowly eased the stick forward to  hold the speed and  angle of climb desired.Everyone who has flown it was instructed this way .It's like a soft field  takeoff and always gives the shortest takeoff roll.  
    
        [quote][b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		WhiskeyVictor36(at)aol.co Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:38 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				In a message dated 3/19/2008 11:56:32 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  by0ung(at)brigham.net writes:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		     Both clean and 40 deg flaps had , as close as I could    tell, the same takeoff roll,   and 20 deg flaps was 50 to 100 ft    shorter. 
     
     
    Boyd,
     
    I don't know what you are flying, but    my older original model Kolb FireStar, with no flaps,  gets off in about    100 feet or so now.  So, if I had flaps and used 20 degrees,    WOW!  I could lift off vertically.  No need for a runway.     hehehe
     
    Bill    Varnes
 Original Kolb FireStar
 Audubon NJ
 Do Not  Archive
  | 	  
 
 Create a Home Theater Like the Pros. Watch the video on AOL Home.
   [quote][b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		jbhart(at)onlyinternet.ne Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:44 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 05:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
 
 Just a thought here;
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  On takeoff in the Firestar,I have always begun the roll with stick back and 
 held it here until the wheels lifted then slowly eased the stick forward to  
 hold the speed and  angle of climb desired. Everyone who has flown it was 
 instructed this way. It's like a soft field  takeoff and always gives the 
 shortest takeoff roll.
 
 | 	  
 Gary,
 
 I believe this is good practice, as you are always ready for the unexpected. 
 In most cases this will work.  Once I stopped by at a grass field to meet a 
 friend.  I had asked if the field was freshly mowed and he said it was.  But 
 what I didn't know and found out was that a good part of the field was 
 covered by water.  On final, you could not see it from the air, but when I 
 three pointed down, water flew every where.  This is where my concern for fuel 
 usage let me down.  I should have flown a low flyby to check out the field.  
 
 I tried my normal soft field takeoff three times, but I could not get off 
 before hitting water.  To get off, I back taxied until I was in the middle 
 of a puddle.  Then I became a little more aggressive on the throttle and let 
 the tail come up.  Just before I got to the next puddle, I pulled the stick 
 back against the stop and the FireFly popped up into ground effect.  If it 
 had not popped, I would have had to chop the throttle, and try again. 
 
 Flying off and on hard surface, I always use about 4 to 5 degrees of 
 flaperon.  This lets the  FireFly stagger off in a three point 
 attitude.
 
 Jack B. Hart FF004
 Winchester, IN 
 
 do not archive
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		rlaird
 
  
  Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 373 Location: Houston
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 10:34 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Grant --
 
 Just about any method mentioned already will work in any situation.  However, I do believe each situation has a preferred method.
 
 This is how I see it:
 
 Method #1 : When it's a smooth turf runway, I do what John H. does, put the stick at "neutral", let the wheel come up on it's own, then when I get to flying speed, I pull back just a bit on the stick and I'm away.  (If it's --really-- smooth, I can also use Method # 3.)
  
 Method #2 : When it's a rough or very rough field/terrain, I will intentionally bring my tailwheel up as soon as I possibly can, usually around 25-30mph, in order to minimize the stress on the tailwheel.  I then wait for about 5-10mph past flying speed and the plane usually does the rest with just some gentle persuasion on the stick.  If I really want to get off the field quickly, then at flying speed, I'll pop it up with a quick pull on the stick, then push the stick back down so I'm flying in ground effect, then wait for my airspeed to build before I pull up.
  
 Method #3 : When it's a hard surface runway, I can do either of the two above, or I can just pull back the stick all the way, and wait for the plane to take off on it's own, then adjust the angle until I'm at best-climb.  However, since I feel it's less stressful on the aircraft to use Method # 1, then I'll usually do that even on hard-surface or very-smooth-turf runways.
  
 Anytime there is a possibility for gusts to hit me during my take-off roll, I might try to keep the tailwheel down a bit longer, as long as I don't think it will harm it... but where it's gusting and I have to pick up the tailwheel, well, I "get ready" for anything that might get thrown at me and get "happy feet" and a 'lively hand" when the gust comes a callin'.   
  
   -- Robert
 On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Jack B. Hart <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net (jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net)> wrote:
 [quote] --> Kolb-List message posted by: "Jack B. Hart" <jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net (jbhart(at)onlyinternet.net)>
  
  Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 05:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
  
  Just a thought here;
  
  >On takeoff in the Firestar,I have always begun the roll with stick back and
  >held it here until the wheels lifted then slowly eased the stick forward to
  >hold the speed and  angle of climb desired. Everyone who has flown it was
  >instructed this way. It's like a soft field  takeoff and always gives the
  >shortest takeoff roll.
  
  
 Gary,
  
  I believe this is good practice, as you are always ready for the unexpected.
  In most cases this will work.  Once I stopped by at a grass field to meet a
  friend.  I had asked if the field was freshly mowed and he said it was.  But
  what I didn't know and found out was that a good part of the field was
  covered by water.  On final, you could not see it from the air, but when I
  three pointed down, water flew every where.  This is where my concern for fuel
  usage let me down.  I should have flown a low flyby to check out the field.
  
  I tried my normal soft field takeoff three times, but I could not get off
  before hitting water.  To get off, I back taxied until I was in the middle
  of a puddle.  Then I became a little more aggressive on the throttle and let
  the tail come up.  Just before I got to the next puddle, I pulled the stick
  back against the stop and the FireFly popped up into ground effect.  If it
  had not popped, I would have had to chop the throttle, and try again.
  
  Flying off and on hard surface, I always use about 4 to 5 degrees of
  flaperon.  This lets the  FireFly stagger off in a three point
  attitude.
  
  Jack B. Hart FF004
  Winchester, IN
  
  do not archive
  
 
  
  
  
  
  
 
 [b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Robert Laird
 
formerly: MkIIIc w/ 912ULS  &  Gyrobee
 
current:  Autogyro Cavalon w/ 914ULS
 
Houston, TX area
 
http://www.Texas-Flyer.com | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		by0ung(at)brigham.net Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:14 pm    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I am flying a mkIII with a 912 and the testing was done on a summer day with over  6000 ft density altitude with field elevation of 4226 ft.   doesn’t sound like apples here.   But when you get it down to a vertical take off I want to see the video.  
    
 Boyd   
    
    
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
 In a message dated 3/19/2008 11:56:32 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, by0ung(at)brigham.net writes:  
 | 	  
 Both clean and 40 deg flaps had , as close as I could tell, the same takeoff roll,   and 20 deg flaps was 50 to 100 ft shorter.   
    
    
 Boyd,  
    
 I don't know what you are flying, but my older original model Kolb FireStar, with no flaps,  gets off in about 100 feet or so now.  So, if I had flaps and used 20 degrees, WOW!  I could lift off vertically.  No need for a runway.  hehehe  
    
 Bill Varnes
  Original Kolb FireStar
  Audubon NJ
  Do Not Archive  
    
        [quote][b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		rowedenny
 
 
  Joined: 09 Mar 2008 Posts: 338 Location: Western PA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:19 pm    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Grant
 Sounds to me like your wheel alignment may be off if its that squirly on 
 pavement.
 
 Denny
 ---
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Dana
 
  
  Joined: 13 Dec 2007 Posts: 1047 Location: Connecticut, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:55 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 09:29 PM 3/19/2008, grantr wrote:
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  On the paved runway we have been forcing the tail off the ground around 40 
 to 45mph. It takes some forward pressure on the stick to unstick the tail. 
 This is usually where it gets squirrelly as the plane wants to dart to the 
 left from the engine torque and p factor..
 
 | 	  
 Torque will only roll the plane, not yaw it.  P-factor will tend to yaw the 
 plane, but only at higher angles of attack (i.e. it'll want to yaw the 
 plane while the tail's down, but not afterwards).  If the plane tries to 
 yaw just as you lift the tail, that's gyroscopic precession, all 
 taildraggers do it to a greater or lesser extent; you just have to be ready 
 for it.
 
 A misalignment between your tailwheel and rudder could be causing it, too.
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		    My plane does not have differential brakes on it either so its all 
  rudder for the steering. The grass landings are easier to handle than the 
  paved landings.
 
 | 	  
 You shouldn't be using differential brakes on takeoff anyway, unless things 
 _really_ get out of hand.
 
 Grass is always easier than pavement, as there's less friction to side motion.
 
 -Dana
 --
   End rush hour traffic now! Legalize vehicular weaponry!
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		jbhart(at)onlyinternet.ne Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 4:59 am    Post subject: Takeoff & landing & stall help | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 06:29 PM 3/19/08 -0700, you wrote:
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
 
 Thanks a lot everyone for the helpful tips.
 
 On the paved runway we have been forcing the tail off the ground around 40 
 to 45mph. It takes some forward pressure on the stick to unstick the tail. 
 | 	  
 This is usually where it gets squirrelly as the plane wants to dart to the 
 left from the engine torque and p factor..  We lift off at 55 as the tires 
 begin to shake from being worn and out of balance. 
 
 Grant,
 
 It really sounds like you have a wheel alignment problem, such as toe in or 
 out, or negative chamber.  Both of these are easily checked by adding some 
 bags of sand to the seat(s) and rolling the plane to an fro to settle the 
 gear.  A little positive chamber and zero toe-in are good. The only other 
 thing that can cause such a problem is unequal or low tire pressure.  If 
 tire pressure is too low, it increases rolling resistance, and as the load 
 rocks from side to side it will cause yaw problems.  Raise your tire 
 pressure to the max and see if it improves the situation.  My FireFly was 
 wicked on hard surfaces until I fixed all of the above.  Toe-in and chamber 
 can be adjusted with judicious force application with a long lever over the 
 axle.
 
 Jack B. Hart FF004
 Winchester, IN
 
 do not archive
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |