  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		nuckolls.bob(at)cox.net Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 5:39 pm    Post subject: EIS interference | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Problem: The EIS engine monitors are annunciating random "phantom" alarm 
 messages, indicating a monitored parameter has exceeded a set limit.  These 
 include high or low EGT&CHT alarms, voltage levels, pressure levels 
 etc.  Of particular interest is that on the EFIS engine monitor page there 
 is a graphic representation of CHT/EGT readings on a time scale (similar to 
 a seismograph trace).  This shows a trace history of these temps as 
 continuous lines advancing across the screen.  On the trace lines of the 
 EGTs in particular there are obvious spikes (plus and minus).  The duration 
 of each spike is virtually instantaneous and indicate an increase or 
 decrease in EGT of from 50-200 degrees, assuming they were accurate.  The 
 spike frequency is random, sometimes occurring 10-15 seconds apart, often 
 much closer- frequency appears to be highest after engine start, and less 
 frequent as the battery recharges.  These spikes appear to be systemic as 
 the alarms being generated are not limited to EGT/CHT (the only data shown 
 as traces) as noted above.
      Since these are strong anomalies in perceived data, one should
      not discount the probability that the noise is coming in through
      the temperature sensor leads (thermocouples I presume) that
      may or may not electrically float at the engine end. The idea
      T/C installation does NOT make electrical contact with the surface
      being measured so that signal ground occurs at the instrument and
      is not duplicated at the crankcase.
 
 At first is seemed to be caused by the Right magneto, as grounding it 
 eliminates the spikes, but many attempts at relocating the P-leads and even 
 disconnecting them entirely made no improvement.  P-leads are 18 gauge 
 shielded, single conductor using the shields to complete the circuit to a 
 L/R/Start type keyswitch.  Any electrical wiring or components near the mag 
 were relocated with no improvement.  Suppressor wires and plugs were tried 
 with no change.  Replacing the mag also did nothing.
 
      Bad mags don't cause this . . . Try running the system with all
      P-leads disconnected at the engine. Kill the engine with fuel cutoff.
      Totally eliminate p-lead wiring as part of the propagation
      pathway.
 Suspecting the rather basic rectifier/regulator, I checked the Z-figures 
 and notes relating to the Jabiru and experimented with a 30,000uF 30VDC 
 electrolytic capacitor between the regulator output and ground.  This 
 clipped the tops of the highest of the spikes shown on the EGT traces, but 
 had little other effect.  Another experiment was to disconnect the 
 alternator output leads from the regulator and run strictly on the battery, 
 but the spikes persisted.  (All connections to the regulator are 
 butt-spliced, soldered & shrink-wrapped)  This leads me to believe it has 
 nothing to do with the charging system and is specific to the Right magneto.
 
     Unlikely that the alternator/rectifier/regulator is a culprit here
     too. There are no events that occur in normal or abnormal operation
     of the power generation at 10-15 second intervals.
 
 I've run out of ideas- all suggestions welcome!
 
 I'd still like to experiment with a better rectifier/regulator, but unsure 
 where to hunt one down- perhaps others have found reliable substitutions? 
 (The B&C PRM1C-14 is limited to 14 amps continuous- 30-35 is required)
 
     If you've run the system with the alternator OFF and the
     problem persists, then it's not a problem with either the
     alternator or the rectifier/regulator. Have you tried running
     the EIS system from a dedicated set of dry cells? A power source
     separate from the ship's bus.
 
     Does the airplane have a single point firewall ground? What
     is the airplane's structure?
 
         Bob . . .
 
         ----------------------------------------)
         ( . . .  a long habit of not thinking   )
         ( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial )
         ( appearance of being right . . .       )
         (                                       )
         (                  -Thomas Paine 1776-  )
         ----------------------------------------
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Mark Phillips in TN
 
 
  Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 431 Location: Columbia, TN
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:15 pm    Post subject: EIS interference | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				In a message dated 10/5/2008 8:40:14 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  nuckolls.bob(at)cox.net writes:
  
      Since these are strong anomalies in  perceived data, one should
      not discount the probability  that the noise is coming in through
      the temperature  sensor leads (thermocouples I presume) that
      may or may  not electrically float at the engine end. The idea
      T/C  installation does NOT make electrical contact with the surface
       being measured so that signal ground occurs at the instrument  and
      is not duplicated at the crankcase.
 
  >>>>>
  Understand.  CHT thermocouples used are TC wires crimped to ring  terminals under spark plugs (supplied by GRT) and obviously grounded at head-  EGTs are standard GRT probes inserted into exhaust pipes held in place by hose  clamps.  Experiment would be removing all CHT probes to eliminate grounding  at head?  This might pinpoint the antagonist, but without dedicated wells  for bayonet-type probes, how to monitor CHTs?
 
   
  
      Bad mags don't cause this . . . Try running  the system with all
      P-leads disconnected at the engine.  Kill the engine with fuel cutoff.
      Totally eliminate  p-lead wiring as part of the propagation
       pathway.
 
  >>>>
  Disconnecting Right mag had no effect- will try both...
   
  
     Unlikely that the alternator/rectifier/regulator is  a culprit here
     too. There are no events that occur in normal or  abnormal operation
     of the power generation at 10-15 second  intervals.
 
  >>>>>
  My tentative conclusion as well, but just checking!
  
 
     If you've run the system with the alternator OFF  and the
     problem persists, then it's not a problem with either  the
     alternator or the rectifier/regulator. Have you tried  running
     the EIS system from a dedicated set of dry cells? A  power source
     separate from the ship's bus.
  >>>>>
  This was next on the experiment list, but if isolated power to instrument  eliminates problem, doesn't that point back to a problem with power supplied to  the EIS with a finger aimed at the alternator/regulator system?  Any  problem powering EIS from a separate PC-625 VLSA batt instead of the dry  cells?
 
     Does the airplane have a single point firewall  ground? What
     is the airplane's structure?
  
  >>>>
  They properly employ forest-of-tabs from B&C.  Composite  structure, stainless firewall over plywood bonded to structure.
   
  Appreciate the reply Bob- will report on experiments...
  Mark
 
 New MapQuest Local shows what's happening at your destination.  Dining, Movies, Events, News & more. Try it out!
   [quote][b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ From The PossumWorks... | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		nuckolls.bob(at)cox.net Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 9:11 pm    Post subject: EIS interference | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 10:13 PM 10/5/2008 -0400, you wrote:
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  In a message dated 10/5/2008 8:40:14 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
 nuckolls.bob(at)cox.net writes:
 
       Since these are strong anomalies in perceived data, one should
       not discount the probability that the noise is coming in through
       the temperature sensor leads (thermocouples I presume) that
       may or may not electrically float at the engine end. The idea
       T/C installation does NOT make electrical contact with the surface
       being measured so that signal ground occurs at the instrument and
       is not duplicated at the crankcase.
  >>>>>
 Understand.  CHT thermocouples used are TC wires crimped to ring terminals 
 under spark plugs (supplied by GRT) and obviously grounded at head- EGTs 
 are standard GRT probes inserted into exhaust pipes held in place by hose 
 clamps.  Experiment would be removing all CHT probes to eliminate 
 grounding at head?  This might pinpoint the antagonist, but without 
 dedicated wells for bayonet-type probes, how to monitor CHTs?
 
 
 | 	  
    Okay, I'm betting that the T/C signal for each
    input goes to a AD595 or similar thermocouple
    conditioning chip. These are high gain op amps
    with limited common mode. When you ground the t/c
    at the engine end, you MUST keep the signal ground
    for the instrument tightly bonded to the crankcase
    too. If you have too small, too shared, too long
    of wires in ground system, common mode noises from
    about anywhere in the system can get into those
    microvolt-sensitive inputs to the TC conditioners.
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   >>>>>
 This was next on the experiment list, but if isolated power to instrument 
 eliminates problem, doesn't that point back to a problem with power 
 supplied to the EIS with a finger aimed at the alternator/regulator 
 system?  Any problem powering EIS from a separate PC-625 VLSA batt instead 
 of the dry cells?
 
 | 	  
     any source of 12v will do. But only tells you what the
     propagation path is . . . not the antagonist. Sub
     the 12 supply (+) first. Don't mess with grounds.
     If the noise is still there, then move the EIS ground
     directly to the crankcase and see what happens.
  	  | Quote: | 	 		       Does the airplane have a single point firewall ground? What
      is the airplane's structure?
  >>>>
 They properly employ forest-of-tabs from B&C.  Composite structure, 
 stainless firewall over plywood bonded to structure.
 
 | 	  
    Okay, make sure that the EIS instrument power ground
    gets it's own dedicated wire to the forest of tabs.
    Check that the bond strap from crankcase to forest
    of tabs is suited to task. 4AWG wire or bigger.
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |