Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

To drag the tail or not

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith601-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
n556p(at)yahoo.com
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 5:54 am    Post subject: To drag the tail or not Reply with quote

Ivor,
I completely agree with all of what Larry wrote. Another consideration is this. I've flown mostly tri-gear Cessnas and Pipers, and have gotten used to flying a certain attitude in the flair for landing. If you fly that attitude (quite nose-high) with a tail-dragger 601, you'll definitely arrive tailwheel first - generally not good. (The three-point attitude on the tail-dragger 601 is pretty close to level.) With the tricycle gear and no extra wheel under the tail, you can flair the CH601 somewhat more aggressively giving a lower touchdown speed and thus a shorter landing roll. That's a big part of why Chris designed the 701 as a tri-gear rather than a tail-dragger. (Rear the "design college" pages about STOL on the Zenith web site.) It's one more thing to consider.

Phil Raker N556P HDS/Stratus ~85% completed



Larry McFarland wrote:

Hi Ivor,
I've a great appreciation for the tail dragger as I started with PA-12
and then a Luscombe 8A. The nose gear offers a better steering option in
rough conditions
than the tail dragger. I know what it's like to have to gun it to break
the tail loose from a bundle of grass or gravel. The positive steering
of the nose gear is much
like the little red wagon for positive direction. You can't pivot about
one gear like the brake assist tail dragger, but you can plan better for
maneuvering and you don't
have the shock of the tailwheel hammering back thru the fuselage. When
you're parked and tied down, the aircraft is better aligned with the
breezes too, so for my
money, the best dollar is spent on having the extra wheel up front. I
always land on the mains, slow a lot and then let down carefully on the
nose gear, so it shouldn't
be a problem. Having the rudder and the nose wheel tied together is
sweet, but I don't use the rudder in normal flight. That might be
different in the XL.
Best regards,

Larry McFarland 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com
do not archive

Ivor Link wrote:
Quote:

*Subject:* To drag the tail or not.
I'm in the early stages of scratch building an 601 XL - The intent is
to visit bush areas to hike around the country ( I chose the 601 over
the 701 merely from the point of view that the cruise speed provides a
better weekend range radius). The question begs to be answered should
I build it with the training wheel on the tail? I learnt to fly on
military taildraggers so am not intimidated - but seeing as the plane
looks just as sexy with a nose wheel, I was wondering whether there
are any stories of strength concerns with the nosewheel set up in
rough airfield conditions?
Ivor Link
South Africa


[quote][b]


- The Matronics Zenith601-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith601-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith601-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group