Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

To Z12 or not to Z12, that is the question.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 6:35 am    Post subject: To Z12 or not to Z12, that is the question. Reply with quote

Quote:
Comments/Questions: Bob a couple of years ago I emailed you requesting information on the Z-14 for my RV-7. Your response was that it may be "overkill" for my airplane. The airplane has a 60 amp main, belt driven alternator and a 20 amp standby alternator, both from B & C. It has one battery. It'll have back-up batteries for the EFIS, GPS and a TruTrak ADI. Now I'm trying to decide between Z-12 and Z-13/20. As I understand your wiring diagrams, Z-12 basically runs off the main alternator, with the standby ready in case voltage from the main drops below a certain level and then it (the standby) takes over. Whereas Z-13/20 utilizes the standby to power an endurance bus, which in turns runs a series of backup instruments and needed lights, flaps, etc. Am I correct?

No. ENDURANCE speaks to minimizing loads on a limited
power resource (battery and perhaps battery + 8A
alternator) for the purpose of having an electrical
endurance that is equal to or greater than flight
endurance as established by remaining fuel.

This means the E-bus is configured first with
those items most useful for HOURS of flight while
the airport of intended destination gets closer.
It's NOT an emergency bus . . . it's the bus that
keeps a maintenance item (crapped alternator) from
becoming an emergency. It has a secondary role of
keeping a contactor failure from becoming an
emergency also by offering dual power paths
to e-bus powered equipment.

Z-13/20 was a bad dream. I'm sorry I published
it. It was removed from the website and will be
removed from subsequent print documents. My
recommendation is that you go with Z-12 as
published. With this abundance of secondary
engine-driven power, you don't need much of
a plan-B . . .just start turning things off
until the SD-20 "overload" light goes out.
If you can't make it home on 20A of snort,
you've got too much stuff in your airplane.

The system you describe has back-ups to back-ups
to the extent that it makes a rational failure
mode effects analysis problematic . . . not
necessarily a bad thing . . . just something
of an exercise in feather-chasing. Don't put
flaps on the e-bus. Review the archives for
e-bus discussions. The real value of the e-bus
speaks to battery-only endurance . . . an
instance that is exceedingly unlikely in your
airplane.


Bob . . .

----------------------------------------)
( . . . a long habit of not thinking )
( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial )
( appearance of being right . . . )
( )
( -Thomas Paine 1776- )
----------------------------------------

[quote][b]


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group