 |
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Float Flyr

Joined: 19 Jul 2006 Posts: 2704 Location: Campbellton, Newfoundland
|
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:59 pm Post subject: LAT Flying through Canada |
|
|
Lynn:
I'm not sure but I think a Sport Pilot can fly in Canada if he has the aviation medical. That of course nullifies the reason for the sport pilot license in the first place. Anyone with a PPL there is definitely no problem.
While I think of it... I was talking to a raft of Transport Canada (TC) inspectors on Friday. I asked about over flying without the 406 mHz ELT. The consensus was no one wanted to say yes or no. They all felt there was some merit to my contention that because the planes would be N numbered that they were flying on foreign authority, therefore legal...(Canadian Reciprocal agreements) Most of the guys said they will get back to me. As soon as I hear anything I'll let you know. BTW the time frame for the implementation of the law that requires the 406 has been set back because of a bit of Canadian political fang-dangling. It was supposed to come into effect on Feb 1 '09 but now they are saying mar 15 (good day Caesar!) is a better estimate. After February there is more pressing legislation for the government to get passed before the summer break so there is a real possibility that the law won't be enacted before fall. Our Government like the one south of the 49th makes snails look like light speeders! In the mean time I'll call again on Monday and ask about the sport pilot flying... I'm almost sure this has come up before and the decision was to allow it if they had the class 3(?) U.S. Aviation Medical.
There is a bit of personal good news. TC has passed over all the licensing of amateur built aircraft to the Recreational Aircraft Association. After several calls I finally contacted the RAA person who trains the inspectors for eastern Canada. He said I wouldn't have to go through all the hassle of deregistering and re-registering my plane because of the engine change (mod). All he wants is for me to do either a W&B amendment or a new W&B and apply for a new special C of A.
[img]cid:image001.jpg(at)01C978FB.1C893BD0[/img]
Noel Loveys
Campbellton, NL, Canada
CDN AME intern, PP-Rec
C-FINB, Kitfox III-A
912 almost installed
Aerocet 1100 floats
[url=noelloveys(at)yahoo.ca]noelloveys(at)yahoo.ca[/url]
--
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
7.29 KB |
Viewed: |
2186 Time(s) |

|
_________________ Noel Loveys
Kitfox III-A
Aerocet 1100 Floats |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lynn Matteson
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 2778 Location: Grass Lake, Michigan
|
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 7:32 pm Post subject: LAT Flying through Canada |
|
|
Good show, Noel! (on the engine change)
Canada needs to further their reciprocal agreements to include the
Sport Pilot...period! And of course I don't have, or WON'T try for
the medical. I've seen too many guys go to the doc and the doc says
"you appear to be in good health, let's get you
tested".....ERRRNNNNDDDTTT!!!!!! red light flashes, you fail, no
more flying! I ain't havin' none of that shi-! I know guys that are
flying w/o a medical, and more power to 'em...until they get caught,
then they are busted for good. At least with a Sport Pilot
certificate, I'm legal as long as I can drag my weary bones up to the
counter every 4 years, wipe the drool off my chin, smile for the
camera, then have my attendant wheel me out to my
airplane...well...almost like that. : )
And so far, I don't think that SP's are falling out of the skies in
any great numbers, so the thinking about using a current drivers'
license in lieu of a medical must have some merit.
"allow it if they had the class 3(?) U.S. Aviation Medical." ??
Allow a person to fly as a Sport Pilot if they have a Medical?
That's like allowing a person to apply a band-aid if they have a
surgeon's license. Methinks they need to rethink this one...
Hey, Noel, did you get from those pictures what you needed? I posted
a test picture to Matronics Kitfox forum like Paul described, but I
haven't seen it, or the email announcing it.
Lynn Matteson
Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger
Jabiru 2200, #2062, 600.2 hrs
Sensenich 62x46
Electroair direct-fire ignition system
New skis done and flying
On Jan 17, 2009, at 9:57 PM, Noel Loveys wrote:
[quote] Lynn:
I'm not sure but I think a Sport Pilot can fly in Canada if he has
the aviation medical. That of course nullifies the reason for the
sport pilot license in the first place. Anyone with a PPL there is
definitely no problem.
While I think of it... I was talking to a raft of Transport Canada
(TC) inspectors on Friday. I asked about over flying without the
406 mHz ELT. The consensus was no one wanted to say yes or no.
They all felt there was some merit to my contention that because
the planes would be N numbered that they were flying on foreign
authority, therefore legal...(Canadian Reciprocal agreements) Most
of the guys said they will get back to me. As soon as I hear
anything I'll let you know. BTW the time frame for the
implementation of the law that requires the 406 has been set back
because of a bit of Canadian political fang-dangling. It was
supposed to come into effect on Feb 1 '09 but now they are saying
mar 15 (good day Caesar!) is a better estimate. After February
there is more pressing legislation for the government to get passed
before the summer break so there is a real possibility that the law
won't be enacted before fall. Our Government like the one south of
the 49th makes snails look like light speeders! In the mean time
I'll call again on Monday and ask about the sport pilot flying...
I'm almost sure this has come up before and the decision was to
allow it if they had the class 3(?) U.S. Aviation Medical.
There is a bit of personal good news. TC has passed over all the
licensing of amateur built aircraft to the Recreational Aircraft
Association. After several calls I finally contacted the RAA
person who trains the inspectors for eastern Canada. He said I
wouldn't have to go through all the hassle of deregistering and re-
registering my plane because of the engine change (mod). All he
wants is for me to do either a W&B amendment or a new W&B and apply
for a new special C of A.
<image001.jpg>
Noel Loveys
Campbellton, NL, Canada
CDN AME intern, PP-Rec
C-FINB, Kitfox III-A
912 almost installed
Aerocet 1100 floats
noelloveys(at)yahoo.ca
--
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Lynn
Kitfox IV-Jabiru 2200
N369LM |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Float Flyr

Joined: 19 Jul 2006 Posts: 2704 Location: Campbellton, Newfoundland
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:16 am Post subject: LAT Flying through Canada |
|
|
Haven't seen the pictures but I'll keep an eye out.
The SNAFU with the medicals is not all on one side of the border. In Canada up to age 45 a person can fill out what is called a medical declaration (class 4 medical). It goes through the 50 y-n questions and then you get to pay a $50 registration fee.. they don't renew licenses here so they more than make up for revenue in the medical registration$. After the magic age of 45 you wake up one morning and all sense of honour has died along with your last two brain cells so you now need to have a regular MD. fill out the form for you and... also order an EKG. As long as the sinus rhythm is normal your good to go for another two years.
I'm not sure what the regs are on the drivers license but I do know that the medical I used to have for the air brake endorsement on my driver's license was a lot more in depth than the medical declaration. In fact it was more in depth than the TC class 2 pilot medical except it is not administered by a flight surgeon. We have ten provinces here the rough equivalent of your states. Each province passes its own legislation on driving... So a drivers license issued in one province will not necessarily be renewed in another province. I think all the provinces will replace a driver's license for a person moving in with little or no fuss but let you old license expire and they come after you like a bear in heat. Drivers school, Tests & the like. All costs $$$.
We don't have a minimum national level of what is an acceptable medical condition to be able to drive a car. So TC as a national body can't accept the license as a valid form of medical. Outside eyesight tests I don't know if there is a place in the country where any other medical tests are required. Here in Newfoundland medical doctors are supposed to be bound to notify the department of highways of any patient who they think should not be driving. Most doctors feel this is an infringement on their practice (it is) and patient doctor confidentiality, some pass the info along, some don't. The Department of Highways, not being the governing body of doctors, takes what it gets... Quietly, very quietly.
Flight surgeons in this country are a different quintal of fish... They are hired by TC so anything they find out is the property of TC. The patient is only allowed to pay for the medical exam.
The long and the short of it is that without a national health standard we will not have a driver's medical in Canada. My best guess is there is a feeling among the lords of the manor at TC that if we allow US sport pilots to fly here on a driver's medical then we, Canadian pilots, will want equal consideration... and we would.
The answer is simple install a minimum national standard for medical health to drive a car. Then allow the driver's license to act as a medical. It probably won't happen too soon as it could mean taking literally thousands of elderly tax payers off the road. It would be better for the country as a whole but it would also be a hard sell. I personally know people who were in their mid nineties and still driving.
South of the 49th the reason to keep PP-UL and PP-Rec (class 4 medical) out is close to the reason Canada keeps driver's medicals out. The FAA feels it has a good system of medical administration and it doesn't want to have any one filling out their own medical forms. That makes the medical a self issue document rather than a national or state issue document. So to keep thousands of Americans who may have lost their licenses for any reason from simply filing out their own medical forms they keep the Canadian guys out.
What can be done on the U.S. side of the border. Same as in Canada, develop a minimum standard for driver's licenses.
Then both governments can take the heads of both the FAA and TC, lock them in a damp mine with cold gruel and candles, leave them there until they iron out a reciprocal agreement. They will be home for supper and we will have the right to visit each other and show off our babes. (The ones with the wings )
Clear as mud??
Noel
--
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Noel Loveys
Kitfox III-A
Aerocet 1100 Floats |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
occom
Joined: 26 Aug 2006 Posts: 404
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 11:55 am Post subject: LAT Flying through Canada |
|
|
---
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lynn Matteson
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 2778 Location: Grass Lake, Michigan
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 12:54 pm Post subject: LAT Flying through Canada |
|
|
Good enough.
Lynn Matteson
Kitfox IV Speedster, taildragger
Jabiru 2200, #2062, 600.2 hrs
Sensenich 62x46
Electroair direct-fire ignition system
New skis done and flying
do not archive
On Jan 18, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Dave G wrote:
[quote]
---
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Lynn
Kitfox IV-Jabiru 2200
N369LM |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|