 |
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dreel(at)cox.net Guest
|
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 11:41 am Post subject: Battery Cranking Power |
|
|
I took some measurements today because my Panasonic LCRD1217P battery cranking power seems marginal on cold, 45 degree, days with my O360A1A and SkyTek permanent magnet starter. I saw 5.5 to 6.5v from the starter side of the starter relay to a stud on the vaccum pad of the engine accessory case. I also saw 5.5 to 6.5 v from the battery + terminal to airframe ground. The battery was fully charged and measured 12.8v and was new. Assuming the battery - terminal to airframe ground connection is good, it's new, and that about 200a is being drawn by the starter, this gives a 25 milliohm internal battery resistance to explain the 6 volt drop on starting. The specs claim the battery has 12 milliohm resistance at 77 degrees. Would the 30 degree temperature drop be enough to reasonably explain this big increase in internal resistance? Could the starter be taking 400a? When the starter would stall, the battery voltage dropped to about 4.5v.
Dave Reel - RV8A
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
brian

Joined: 02 Jan 2006 Posts: 643 Location: Sacramento, California, USA
|
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 2:29 pm Post subject: Battery Cranking Power |
|
|
DAVID REEL wrote:
Quote: |
I took some measurements today because my Panasonic LCRD1217P battery cranking power seems marginal
|
If you want to see if your battery is holding up under cranking current,
you need to measure the voltage on the battery terminals. If you are
looking for losses, you need to measure the voltage on the starter
itself. You need BOTH measurements to figure voltage drop.
There are inexpensive meters that you just hold against the hot lead
from battery to starter that will show starter current draw. You should
be able to get one at a well-stocked auto parts store.
With those three measurements in hand you can get a really good feel for
now your battery and starting system are performing.
--
Brian Lloyd 361 Catterline Way
brian-yak at lloyd dot com Folsom, CA 95630
+1.916.367.2131 (voice) +1.270.912.0788 (fax)
I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things . . .
- Antoine de Saint-Exupery
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Brian Lloyd
brian-yak at lloyd dot com
+1.916.367.2131 (voice) +1.270.912.0788 (fax)
I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things . . .
- Antoine de Saint-Exupery |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
markn(at)fuse.net Guest
|
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 6:57 am Post subject: Battery Cranking Power |
|
|
Brian:
You have hit the problem on the head. A serious drawback to the SkyTec
starters is their very high current draw on each compression stroke. I
believe it is entirely possible that your starter is indeed drawing 400 amps
twice per engine revolution. It was for this reason, and using dual
Lightspeed III ignition systems, that I swapped my SkyTec over to a field
wound starter. They weigh more, but their cranking current is around half of
the series wound models. High current draw like this will pull the battery
voltage way down as you measured
As a footnote, I discussed this phenomenon with a representative from SkyTec
at Oshkosh in 2004. He could not have been more evasive and curt. I believe
his response to my query was something like "Cranking current is not our
concern, that is the airframe manufacturer's problem"
Mark Neubauer
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nuckollsr(at)cox.net Guest
|
Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 11:54 am Post subject: Battery Cranking Power |
|
|
At 09:51 AM 3/26/2006 -0500, you wrote:
Quote: |
Brian:
You have hit the problem on the head. A serious drawback to the SkyTec
starters is their very high current draw on each compression stroke. I
believe it is entirely possible that your starter is indeed drawing 400 amps
twice per engine revolution. It was for this reason, and using dual
Lightspeed III ignition systems, that I swapped my SkyTec over to a field
wound starter. They weigh more, but their cranking current is around half of
the series wound models. High current draw like this will pull the battery
voltage way down as you measured
As a footnote, I discussed this phenomenon with a representative from SkyTec
at Oshkosh in 2004. He could not have been more evasive and curt. I believe
his response to my query was something like "Cranking current is not our
concern, that is the airframe manufacturer's problem"
Mark Neubauer
|
This is precisely why B&C stayed with wound-field
starters after considerable evaluation of the simpler
technology many years ago. The PM starters may indeed put
out more torque at a given terminal voltage but at higher
current draws too (you don't get something for nothing).
You can take advantage of this feature only if your battery's
internal resistance combined with the system's series resitance
is sufficiently low to deliver the power demand.
Yes, it is the manufacturer's problem to deal with the
hardware they select for integration into their products . . .
unfortunately, few folks in the airframe systems business
choose to be very well informed.
Bob . . .
< What is so wonderful about scientific truth...is that >
< the authority which determines whether there can be >
< debate or not does not reside in some fraternity of >
< scientists; nor is it divine. The authority rests >
< with experiment. >
< --Lawrence M. Krauss >
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
william.p.dube(at)noaa.go Guest
|
Posted: Mon Mar 27, 2006 12:42 pm Post subject: Battery Cranking Power |
|
|
The PM starters will try to run at a specific RPM. They will draw the
current needed to do that, or they will sag the battery voltage trying
to do it. If the engine turns hard, they will draw a very large current.
If the engine turns easy, they will draw much less current. (The PM
starter RPM will be proportional to the supply voltage.)
The behavior of a series-wound starter is more complicated, but they
tend to put out a constant HP (rather than a constant speed.) They run
faster if the engine turns easier, and turn slower if the engine turns
harder. The current draw from the battery tends to be much more constant
than with a PM starter.
Bill Dube'
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|