rdewees(at)mindspring.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 5:28 am    Post subject: Zodiac 601 HDS and Corvair engines and taildraggers | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Dave and others,
 I now have over 130 hours on my 601HDS taildragger and Jabiru 3300 
 motor.  The only plane I am an expert on is my own (at least that's what 
 the FAA said when they give me a nifty plastic  Repairman's Certificate 
 card).  IMHO a lot of "common" information on HDS performance is not 
 common at all.  My HDS  TD is a joy to fly and took very little 
 training.  My largest block of tailwheel time  came from a UL Cub clone 
 that was tame as a kitten.  I took my  BFR in a Taylorcraft pryor to 
 soloing the HDS and had no problems at all. Visibility is no issue at 
 all since the tail doesn't sit much lower than the tri-gear model.  I 
 can't say for sure if it lands shorter or handles rough fields better 
 than tri gear but I fly out of a field  that is both short and rough.  I 
 can say it looks sexy and draws a crowd even in the midst of nice tri 
 gear ZAC models.
 I didn't chose to insure till I had flown off the Phase I hours and 
 insurance wasn't rated  higher because of TW configuration, but because 
 of turf strip i'm based in. 
   Re performance-- while I have heard that the cruse and top speeds of 
 XL and HDS are inflated I find them to be conservative. I know of at 
 least one local Jab powered XL that is probably capable of  150 plus mph 
 WOT.  Mine is  slower than that but not a lot.  I cruse at 125-128 mph 
 and burn  about 4.3 gph.  No complaints at all there. Re "twitchiness" 
 -- this is a little hard to explain.  Yes, when you yank on a HDS it 
 will TURN, but if you don't it won't do it by itself.  I think of 
 twitchy as flying a Sonex  and being able to turn by moving your head 
 from side to side.  I don't think any 600- 800 pound plane is going to 
 handle tufbulence as well as a Mooney or a heavier plane but it's for 
 day vfr flight, generally and the twitchiness "problem" is the 
 delightful light handling that makes it feel different from a C152.  
 I've never been a yank and bank pilot but the ease of doing a 50 degree 
 turn makes you feel like Walter Mitty (if you want to).
   Re the difference between the XL and the HDS.  Could't comment of the 
 choice at the time I got my HDS project because there wasn't an XL.  I 
 do think the airfoil is better on the XL as well as a number of problem 
 issues that weren't address with earlier HD/HDS models.  I think the XL 
 is a  refinement of the HD series with it's good and bad points.  It 
 weighs more but has more wing area and I like the clean spring gear 
 option. OTOH I like the puggish military look to the HDS taildrgger with 
 it's bent wings.  I can't comment on the flap issue but if I had them I 
 would use them, but don't so I can't.  My HDS slips just fine and allows 
 descents into long or short fields.
   Re Corvair powered HDS planes- there is at least one that I am aware 
 of built by Greg Jannakos.  He is in the early stages of flight testing 
 with it and you would have to ask him what his experience is with it. 
   I am sure there will be something like an XL Plus or some newer, 
 slicker model than the current group of ZAC offerings.  Nothing is 
 perfect for everyone  so don't sit back and gloat on your choice.  
 Finish up whatever you have and fly it.  It's a great family of planes 
 with strong and weaker points but it will get you in the air and smiling.
  
  
 Ron DeWees
 601HDS   N601TD
 
 Dave Thompson wrote:
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
 
 Jerome,
 
  
 
 I asked the same question of "Taildragger or tricycle" to William Wynne. All
 his aircraft are taildraggers. He said something like this: Typically,
 unless you have a large amount of time in taildraggers, Insurance will be
 considerably more. Most people are "tricycle trained". If you build
 tricycle, more of your friends can fly it, insurance will be cheaper and it
 should be easer to sell, if that time comes.
 
  
 
 That's my two cents worth! I'm planning to build a tricycle 601XL. 128 total
 hours logged; 5 in a cub, the rest in Cessna 150's and 172's, 25 years ago.
 
  
 
 By the way, at the risk of sounding picky, the 601HD has been upgraded and
 now it is the 601XL., Not that anything is wrong with the HD, the XL is the
 latest model.
 
  
 
 Dave Thompson
 
 dave.thompson(at)verizon.net
 
  
 
 
   
 
 
 | 	 
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  |