 |
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
frank-margie(at)worldnet. Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 8:01 pm Post subject: Still fighting--- |
|
|
Ref. the discussion on roll problems/rigging/etc., jerb wrote:
Subject: Re: still fighting
--> Kolb-List message posted by: jerb <ulflyer(at)verizon.net (ulflyer(at)verizon.net)>
Many different things can contribute to the flight characteristics
your experiencing. Sounds like a rigging problem. In order to
determine the likely cause it will be necessary to properly level the
aircraft in the proper attitude to take correct meaningful
measurements. This becomes a process of elimination. Refer to the
---------------------
John/all,
Sounds like the offset universal works, once you have eliminated rigging problems as a cause---jerb's list would be a good guide.
There is another possibility that hasn't ever been mentioned in discussions on roll problems in Kolbs. And this may not apply to pushers, or planes with flaps. But it's worth thinking about. I had the same problem on a non-Kolb (Flightstar), which is a tractor design, and mine does not have flaps. It does have full-span ailerons. We checked everything we could think of, or anybody we asked could think of. Engine offset helped, but only a little. Reducing the droop in the ailerons helped some, but didn't come close to fixing the problem. I don't know where I got the idea, but I had a friend run the plane up while I stood behind it (actually under the boom, about 2 feet behind the aileron trailing edge). I held a piece of cardboard (maybe a foot square) in the propwash---you could feel the difference between right and left sides, there was a LOT more push on the cardboard on the left side. Evidently the descending prop blade pushes more air even when on the ground. And it evidently was pushing upward harder on the left aileron, causing a roll to the left. This was true even when we adjusted all the droop out of the ailerons---and they're supposed to be set at 3 degrees.
We put a trim tab on the right aileron, with the outboard edge even with the tip of the prop arc (this is way inboard of the usual location for aileron tabs). Tab is about 12" wide, 2-1/2" deep, and only bent down about 15-20 degrees. Result was hands off flying (as far as roll was concerned, we also put a tab on the rudder to fix a small yaw tendency).
How could this be true on a pusher? Especially with your descending blade on the right? I don't know, but----your prop is pretty close to the TE of your flaps---could the descending blade build up pressure above the flap, pushing it down slightly? Could the ascending blade be stronger on a Kolb, maybe resulting in a slight upward push on the left flap (or aileron)? Is there enough play in the flap linkage to allow movement? How close is the prop arc to the inboard end of the aileron? I don't know how to check for thrust differential on a pusher---the propwash isn't separated by the windscreen like it is on mine, and the cardboard trick obviously won't work. Wonder what smoke would show about the airflow around the prop? Just food for thought. Having been there, I know what you're going thru.
Good luck.
Frank Clyma
Orange Park, FL
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ulflyer(at)verizon.net Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 9:18 pm Post subject: Still fighting--- |
|
|
Frank, A Kolb if it has been built straight or any properly design aircraft for that matter, shouldn't need any major trim tabs, you may have masked the symptom but you never determined or corrected the root cause.
Some thing major is in play with this guys airplane based upon his comments.
jerb
At 11:00 PM 6/24/2006, you wrote:
Quote: | Ref. the discussion on roll problems/rigging/etc., jerb wrote:
--> Kolb-List message posted by: jerb <ulflyer(at)verizon.net (ulflyer(at)verizon.net)>
Many different things can contribute to the flight characteristics
your experiencing. Sounds like a rigging problem. In order to
determine the likely cause it will be necessary to properly level the
aircraft in the proper attitude to take correct meaningful
measurements. This becomes a process of elimination. Refer to the
---------------------
John/all,
Sounds like the offset universal works, once you have eliminated rigging problems as a cause---jerb's list would be a good guide.
There is another possibility that hasn't ever been mentioned in discussions on roll problems in Kolbs. And this may not apply to pushers, or planes with flaps. But it's worth thinking about. I had the same problem on a non-Kolb (Flightstar), which is a tractor design, and mine does not have flaps. It does have full-span ailerons. We checked everything we could think of, or anybody we asked could think of. Engine offset helped, but only a little. Reducing the droop in the ailerons helped some, but didn't come close to fixing the problem. I don't know where I got the idea, but I had a friend run the plane up while I stood behind it (actually under the boom, about 2 feet behind the aileron trailing edge). I held a piece of cardboard (maybe a foot square) in the propwash---you could feel the difference between right and left sides, there was a LOT more push on the cardboard on the left side. Evidently the descending prop blade pushes more air even when on the ground. And it evidently was pushing upward harder on the left aileron, causing a roll to the left. This was true even when we adjusted all the droop out of the ailerons---and they're supposed to be set at 3 degrees.
We put a trim tab on the right aileron, with the outboard edge even with the tip of the prop arc (this is way inboard of the usual location for aileron tabs). Tab is about 12" wide, 2-1/2" deep, and only bent down about 15-20 degrees. Result was hands off flying (as far as roll was concerned, we also put a tab on the rudder to fix a small yaw tendency).
How could this be true on a pusher? Especially with your descending blade on the right? I don't know, but----your prop is pretty close to the TE of your flaps---could the descending blade build up pressure above the flap, pushing it down slightly? Could the ascending blade be stronger on a Kolb, maybe resulting in a slight upward push on the left flap (or aileron)? Is there enough play in the flap linkage to allow movement? How close is the prop arc to the inboard end of the aileron? I don't know how to check for thrust differential on a pusher---the propwash isn't separated by the windscreen like it is on mine, and the cardboard trick obviously won't work. Wonder what smoke would show about the airflow around the prop? Just food for thought. Having been there, I know what you're going thru.
Good luck.
Frank Clyma
Orange Park, FL |
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Richard Pike

Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 1671 Location: Blountville, Tennessee
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 3:34 am Post subject: Still fighting--- |
|
|
The prop does create a bias as you describe. Note the sides of the
fuselage just ahead of the prop, the gnats are plastered on the right
fuselage side, and the underside of the left flap, but not on the left
side of the fuselage, or the underside of the right flap.
Richard Pike
MKIII N420P (420ldPoops)
frank & margie wrote:
Quote: | Ref. the discussion on roll problems/rigging/etc., jerb wrote:
Subject: Re: still fighting
<mailto:ulflyer(at)verizon.net>>
Many different things can contribute to the flight characteristics
your experiencing. Sounds like a rigging problem. In order to
determine the likely cause it will be necessary to properly level the
aircraft in the proper attitude to take correct meaningful
measurements. This becomes a process of elimination. Refer to the
---------------------
John/all,
<snip>
---your prop is pretty close to the TE of your flaps---could the
descending blade build up pressure above the flap, pushing it down
slightly? Could the ascending blade be stronger on a Kolb, maybe
resulting in a slight upward push on the left flap (or aileron)? Is
there enough play in the flap linkage to allow movement? How close is
the prop arc to the inboard end of the aileron? I don't know how to
check for thrust differential on a pusher---the propwash isn't
separated by the windscreen like it is on mine, and the cardboard
trick obviously won't work. Wonder what smoke would show about the
airflow around the prop? Just food for thought. Having been there, I
know what you're going thru.
Good luck.
Frank Clyma
Orange Park, FL
|
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ Richard Pike
Kolb MKIII N420P (420ldPoops)
Kingsport, TN 3TN0
Forgiving is tough, being forgiven is wonderful, and God's grace really is amazing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
John Hauck

Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 4639 Location: Titus, Alabama (hauck's holler)
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 5:37 am Post subject: Still fighting--- |
|
|
How could this be true on a pusher? Especially with your
descending blade on the right?
Frank Clyma
Orange Park, FL
Decending blade may not be on the right, depending on what type engine
is powering the airplane and whether it is turning through a gear box
or belt drive. Rotax 2 strokes rotate opposite direction 4 strokes.
john h
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ John Hauck
MKIII/912ULS
hauck's holler
Titus, Alabama |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ulflyer(at)verizon.net Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 6:39 am Post subject: Still fighting--- |
|
|
Richard,
That's because there are a bunch more right wings gnats than there
are left wings.
jerb
At 06:28 AM 6/25/2006, you wrote:
Quote: |
The prop does create a bias as you describe. Note the sides of the
fuselage just ahead of the prop, the gnats are plastered on the
right fuselage side, and the underside of the left flap, but not on
the left side of the fuselage, or the underside of the right flap.
Richard Pike
MKIII N420P (420ldPoops)
frank & margie wrote:
>Ref. the discussion on roll problems/rigging/etc., jerb wrote:
>
>Subject: Re: still fighting
>
>
><mailto:ulflyer(at)verizon.net>>
>
>Many different things can contribute to the flight characteristics
>your experiencing. Sounds like a rigging problem. In order to
>determine the likely cause it will be necessary to properly level the
>aircraft in the proper attitude to take correct meaningful
>measurements. This becomes a process of elimination. Refer to the
>
>---------------------
>John/all,
> <snip>
>---your prop is pretty close to the TE of your flaps---could the
>descending blade build up pressure above the flap, pushing it down
>slightly? Could the ascending blade be stronger on a Kolb, maybe
>resulting in a slight upward push on the left flap (or
>aileron)? Is there enough play in the flap linkage to allow
>movement? How close is the prop arc to the inboard end of the
>aileron? I don't know how to check for thrust differential on a
>pusher---the propwash isn't separated by the windscreen like it is
>on mine, and the cardboard trick obviously won't work. Wonder what
>smoke would show about the airflow around the prop? Just food for
>thought. Having been there, I know what you're going thru.
>
>Good luck.
>
>Frank Clyma
>Orange Park, FL
|
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
frank-margie(at)worldnet. Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 9:33 am Post subject: Still fighting--- |
|
|
jerb wrote:
Frank, A Kolb if it has been built straight or any properly design
aircraft for that matter, shouldn't need any major trim tabs, you may
have masked the symptom but you never determined or corrected the root cause.
Some thing major is in play with this guys airplane based upon his comments.
jerb
-----------------------
jer,
I think you're right on both counts. The common use of an offset bushing, however, does indicate something related especially to Kolbs. It may be mostly weight offset to one side when flown solo, as John H points out. Mine may be related to the distance from the prop to the windscreen, and the way the windscreen splits the propwash. Or I may have something else going on that we never found. As John also said, we never stop learning. And to some extent, every plane is just slightly different---even 2 supposedly identical Mark 3's are probably just a little different.
jer, would you contact me off-list? I have a totally non-Kolb item I'd like to get your input on.
Frank Clyma
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The BaronVonEvil
Joined: 23 Jun 2006 Posts: 76 Location: Walla Walla, WA.
|
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 6:05 pm Post subject: Re: Still fighting--- |
|
|
Hi All,
On an Item of note regarding "Still Fighting". I have a Firestar II that I bought used a few years ago. It flew quite well and without trim. About two vears ago I decided to recover the fuselage due to some wear and tear of the fabric and primer failure issues. I thought about repriming the fuselage cage with epoxy primer as had the original builder. However I decided to have the cage powder coated for the better durability it offers.
After completion I flew my Firestar only to find out that now I had a right wing heavy issue and needed lots of trim. I didnt change anything on the wings or struts. I bought the English Ujoints and corrected the problem by changing the incidence of the left wing. ( It took three washers in the joint).
Apparently during the powdercoat process of heating up the cage to make the material flow, the heat (400+ degrees) allowed the cage to relax enough here and there to change the incidence between the wing panels.
So if you are thinking of powdercoating your cage, it is highly advisable that you do so at the start of construction. Otherwise you may end up retrimming your plane as I had to.
Thanks for the Great Kolb Forum
The Baron
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
162.56 KB |
Viewed: |
287 Time(s) |

|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|