frankroskind(at)HOTMAIL.C Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 3:35 am Post subject: Tri-pacer vs. 801 was RE: CH801 Glide Ratio? |
|
|
So what other comparisons can you make between the Tri-Pacer and the 801?
Tripacers seem to be among the least expnsive certified aircraft, and seem
worthy of consideration.
Reply-To: zenith-list(at)matronics.com
Hi
I tried figuring this out last nigh so I went flying. At 68 mph with no
power I was dropping 850'/min. 68 mph is 100'/sec or 6000'/min. That is a
glide ratio of 7:1. I do have 8.50x6 tires on the mains which is probably
bigger than the 8.00's every body else has. Coming from a background of
flying a Tri-pacer with large tires the glide ratio looks familiar.
When I'm flying over water I figure for every 1000' I'm up I can glide a
mile. Heck at 7:1, I may have enough altitude to fly a pattern.
As my buddy says "this ain't no Cessna". If you want Cessna performance,
you should buy a Cessna!
Bill Wilcox
N801BW
Valdez, AK
Finally flying after fixing what I broke. Soon to be on floats.
260 Hrs
| - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |
|
|
|