  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		bryanmmartin
 
 
  Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1018
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:18 pm    Post subject: Sun Shade | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I have the tinted canopy on my plane. I have no trouble with night  
 flying in it. The tinting is not that dark, it's about like the  
 windshield tint on most cars. It probably helps reduce the insolation  
 during daylight but it still gets plenty hot in there with the canopy  
 down and no shade.
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   
  <randy(at)shadycreekoutlaws.com>
 
  What about the tinted canopies some people use on the XL's...?  Do  
  you think there'd be the same issue?  I'm debating this in the back  
  of my mind, now, for when the time comes...
 
  Thanks,
 
  Randy
  XL Wings - Plans Only
  http://www.n344rb.com
 
 | 	  
 -- 
 Bryan Martin
 N61BM, CH 601 XL,
 RAM Subaru, Stratus redrive.
 
  |  | - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ -- 
 
Bryan Martin
 
N61BM, CH 601 XL, Stratus Subaru.
 
do not archive. | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		p.mulwitz(at)worldnet.att Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 8:43 pm    Post subject: Sun Shade | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Hi Randy,
 
 I am afraid you suffer from a little misunderstanding.  Light Sport 
 Aircraft can fly at night or IFR if properly equiped.  It is Sport 
 Pilots or others limited to Sport Pilot privileges due to lack of a 
 medical certificate that are limited to VFR day operations.
 
 Paul
 XL fuselage.
 do not archive
 
 At 01:14 PM 7/14/2006, you wrote:
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
 
 Randy,
      If you are building your XL in compliance with the Light Sport 
  Plane criteria, you cannot fly at night so a tinted canopy would be 
  the way to go. That's the way I am going but I don't think a tinted 
  canopy is going to keep the heat out as much as a shade so I plan 
  to have both.  I agree with the member who says it's better to use 
  the Van's sliding shade rather that the suction cup type for the 
  same reasons  he stated.
 
 Bob Stone, Harker Heights, Tx
 Building an XL
 Do not Archive
 >
 
 
 | 	  
 -
 
  |  | - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		p.mulwitz(at)worldnet.att Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 8:57 pm    Post subject: Sun Shade | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Hi Jim,
 
 It seems you and the other guys are all correct about the night and 
 IFR issue.  Apparently it all depends on what type of airworthiness 
 certificate you have.  As a bunch of airplane builders, I think those 
 of us who frequent this list are most likely to wind up with E-AB or 
 E-LSA certificates.  In that case, the FAR equipment and 
 certification requirements will rule.
 
 If I remember it all correctly, for night flight a plane must have 
 operating position lights and (at least according to one inspector I 
 spoke to) anti-collision strobes.  For IFR, you need a reasonably 
 full panel including some assortment of radio equipment and you need 
 your pressure instrument system certified every two years.
 
 I guess it makes sense that S-LSA airplanes would have a different 
 set of rules.  It also seems to make sense that the POH is a medium 
 for the manufacturer to limit his planes beyond the limits placed by 
 the government.  I don't see what the manufacturer can do to you if 
 you fly your properly equipped S-LSA plane at night except for 
 possibly limiting his liability should you get squashed flat.  I 
 don't think the FAA would enforce such limits that go beyond the FARs.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Paul
 XL fuselage
 do  not archive
 
 At 03:26 PM 7/14/2006, you wrote:
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  However, if a manufacturer wants to limit his SLSA aircraft's
 legal performance envelope in any way to limit his post-production
 liability, he can do so through the POH.  Let the buyer beware.  You should
 not purchase an SLSA without first reading the POH from cover to cover. For
 an ELSA, the POH, I believe, is produced by the builder, you, and it is up
 to you what you put into the POH.
 
 COMMENTS?
 
 | 	 
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		jpellien
 
 
  Joined: 24 Jun 2006 Posts: 21 Location: Basye, Virginia
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 7:48 am    Post subject: Sun Shade | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Paul,
 
 Yes.  It all comes down to liability in case something goes wrong and the
 lawyers get involved.
 
 Jim
 
 Jim Pellien
 Mid-Atlantic Sports Planes
 Sky Bryce Airport (VG18)
 Basye, VA
 www.MASPL.com
 703-313-4818
  
 
 --
 
  |  | - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ Jim Pellien
 
Mid-Atlantic Sports Planes
 
703-313-4818
 
703-851-9375
 
www.MASPL.com
 
"Learn-2-Fly-in-1-Week" | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Tebenkof(at)aol.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 7:33 pm    Post subject: Sun Shade | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				One consideration I have not seen mentioned in the debate about night  flight with a Rotax:  The FAA may or may not care, in an experimental  amateur built aircraft, whether Rotax gives you permission to fly at night with  their engine.  But it seems to me your insurance company might, in case you  care about such things.  I bend my airplane in an engine-out night landing  and I would expect the insurance company to point out to me that Rotax says no  night flight, and they (the insurance company) would say "tough luck".   Maybe this is not right.  Any thoughts?
   
  Jim Greenough
 
  |  | - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		bryanmmartin
 
 
  Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1018
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 8:34 pm    Post subject: Sun Shade | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				It doesn't make any difference what Rotax says, what matters is what the insurance policy says. If you didn't change the configuration of the plane since the policy was written and the company didn't specifically exclude night flight in that configuration, they are bound by the terms of the contract. They may nit-pick the hell out of every detail of the policy, but they can't change it after the fact.
 Remember, this advice is worth every penny you paid for it.  
 
 On Jul 15, 2006, at 11:08 PM, Tebenkof(at)aol.com (Tebenkof(at)aol.com) wrote:
  	  | Quote: | 	 		    One consideration I have not seen mentioned in the debate about night flight with a Rotax:  The FAA may or may not care, in an experimental amateur built aircraft, whether Rotax gives you permission to fly at night with their engine.  But it seems to me your insurance company might, in case you care about such things.  I bend my airplane in an engine-out night landing and I would expect the insurance company to point out to me that Rotax says no night flight, and they (the insurance company) would say "tough luck".  Maybe this is not right.  Any thoughts?
   
  Jim Greenough
  | 	  
 
  -- 
 Bryan Martin
 N61BM, CH 601 XL,
 RAM Subaru, Stratus redrive.
 do not archive.
 
  |  | - The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ -- 
 
Bryan Martin
 
N61BM, CH 601 XL, Stratus Subaru.
 
do not archive. | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |