  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		Dave Saylor
 
 
  Joined: 11 Jan 2015 Posts: 210 Location: GILROY, CA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 11:14 am    Post subject: Thermocouple test | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I got into a little debate at work the other day about testing thermocouples.  The task is to check for a millivolt rise while heating each probe.  My coworker was checking for resistance and got a little defensive when I pointed out that it calls to check for millivolts.  The justification was "well, I use resistance".  He was seeing a change in resistance with heat applied.  I was seeing a change too, but I was looking at millivolts.
 Now I'm wondering.  Does checking for resistance give a less valid result than checking for voltage?  The instructions just say to look for a rise in voltage, not any specific value.  Does a "rise" in millivolts give any better information than a change in resistance?  FWIW, the resistance was rising when heat was applied as well.
 The system consists of four thermocouples in parallel.  Application is a helicopter engine.
 Thanks for your help,
 Dave
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ --Dave
 
KWVI | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 12:55 pm    Post subject: Thermocouple test | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 02:13 PM 3/14/2023, you wrote:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  I got into a little debate at work the other day about testing thermocouples.  The task is to check for a millivolt rise while heating each probe.  My coworker was checking for resistance and got a little defensive when I pointed out that it calls to check for millivolts.  The justification was "well, I use resistance".  He was seeing a change in resistance with heat applied.  I was seeing a change too, but I was looking at millivolts.
 
  Now I'm wondering.  Does checking for resistance give a less valid result than checking for voltage?  The instructions just say to look for a rise in voltage, not any specific value.  Does a "rise" in millivolts give any better information than a change in resistance?  FWIW, the resistance was rising when heat was applied as well.
 
  The system consists of four thermocouples in parallel.  Application is a helicopter engine. | 	  
    The procedure(s) you've described are gross
    functionality tests to (1) show continuity across
    the thermocouple and (2) verify that the thing
    on the other end is indeed a thermocouple. I.e.
    marked change of voltage with temperature.
 
    These tests say nothing about calibration or accuracy
    although if there is continuity, then there is little doubt
    as to accuracy. Thermoelectric effects are kinda
    molecular and not subject to 'drift'.
 
    4 thermocouples in parallel, assuming similar
    environments within the engine, will yield an
    AVERAGE temperature measurement for the 4
    items of interest.  At the same time, testing
    one of the 4 while still parallel connected
    to the other 3 greatly reduces the sensitivity
    of effects attributable to the one.
 
    But you are correct . . . Thermocouples are
    VOLTAGE generators with known scale factors
    (millivolts per degree C change). An ohmmeter
    deduces resistance of a conductor path by measuring
    the voltage drop through that path when it's
    'excited' by some test bias.  Since the ohmmeter
    is translating voltage values to displayed
    resistance, it stands to reason that heating
    a thermocouple connected to an ohmmeter would
    manifest in a change of resistance reading.
 
    But again, while this test says, "yeah, there
    may be a thermocouple out there I'm seeing,"
    it's no better or worse test of function than
    simply looking for the generated voltage. It's
    VOLTAGE that offers knowledge about what's
    happening in the engine.
 
  
    Bob . . .
 
                     //// 
                    (o o) 
     ===========o00o=(_)=o00o========= 
     < Go ahead, make my day . . .   > 
     < show me where I'm wrong.      > 
     =================================
   
     In the interest of creative evolution
     of the-best-we-know-how-to-do based
     on physics and good practice.
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Dave Saylor
 
 
  Joined: 11 Jan 2015 Posts: 210 Location: GILROY, CA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 1:31 pm    Post subject: Thermocouple test | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Thanks Bob, that's just the kind of answer I was looking for.  We'll all talk about this and maybe each learn a bit.  --Dave
 
 On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 1:57 PM Robert L. Nuckolls, III <nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com (nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com)> wrote:
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		    At 02:13 PM 3/14/2023, you wrote:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  I got into a little debate at work the other day about testing thermocouples.  The task is to check for a millivolt rise while heating each probe.  My coworker was checking for resistance and got a little defensive when I pointed out that it calls to check for millivolts.  The justification was "well, I use resistance".  He was seeing a change in resistance with heat applied.  I was seeing a change too, but I was looking at millivolts.
 
  Now I'm wondering.  Does checking for resistance give a less valid result than checking for voltage?  The instructions just say to look for a rise in voltage, not any specific value.  Does a "rise" in millivolts give any better information than a change in resistance?  FWIW, the resistance was rising when heat was applied as well.
 
  The system consists of four thermocouples in parallel.  Application is a helicopter engine. | 	  
    The procedure(s) you've described are gross
    functionality tests to (1) show continuity across
    the thermocouple and (2) verify that the thing
    on the other end is indeed a thermocouple. I.e.
    marked change of voltage with temperature.
 
    These tests say nothing about calibration or accuracy
    although if there is continuity, then there is little doubt
    as to accuracy. Thermoelectric effects are kinda
    molecular and not subject to 'drift'.
 
    4 thermocouples in parallel, assuming similar
    environments within the engine, will yield an
    AVERAGE temperature measurement for the 4
    items of interest.  At the same time, testing
    one of the 4 while still parallel connected
    to the other 3 greatly reduces the sensitivity
    of effects attributable to the one.
 
    But you are correct . . . Thermocouples are
    VOLTAGE generators with known scale factors
    (millivolts per degree C change). An ohmmeter
    deduces resistance of a conductor path by measuring
    the voltage drop through that path when it's
    'excited' by some test bias.  Since the ohmmeter
    is translating voltage values to displayed
    resistance, it stands to reason that heating
    a thermocouple connected to an ohmmeter would
    manifest in a change of resistance reading.
 
    But again, while this test says, "yeah, there
    may be a thermocouple out there I'm seeing,"
    it's no better or worse test of function than
    simply looking for the generated voltage. It's
    VOLTAGE that offers knowledge about what's
    happening in the engine.
 
  
    Bob . . .
 
                     //// 
                    (o o) 
     ===========o00o=(_)=o00o========= 
     < Go ahead, make my day . . .   > 
     < show me where I'm wrong.      > 
     =================================
   
     In the interest of creative evolution
     of the-best-we-know-how-to-do based
     on physics and good practice.
    
  | 	 
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ --Dave
 
KWVI | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |