  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		airman(at)appledumplings. Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 4:21 pm    Post subject: Oil Temp Followup | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				All,
 
 I  have tracked down the AK(Accessory Kit)  put out by American  
 General Aircraft for upgrading the oil cooler on the AA5B.
 The cooler used is the Stewart Warner 8406R.  Apparently they never  
 produced this kit. Anyway the question I have is this:
 
 There are other companies that have coolers,which are cheaper, that  
 have cross-over numbers to the 8406R such as NDM part 20002A and Aero  
 Classic
 800075.  Can these be substituted legally?  what is the difference  
 between PMA and FAA approved?
 Thanks Much ,
 Thomas
              	 ____|____
                         /[   ]\
       <:::::::::::::[<=o=>]:::::::::::::>
                       o/       \o
 N74225				D73
 
  |  | - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		andy747(at)charter.net Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 4:55 pm    Post subject: Oil Temp Followup | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Hi Thomas,
 
 I am not an A&P and I sometimes get upset at the very officious replies to 
 simple questions so here is my input.
 
 PMA means same as factory and you can install it with a log book entry. 
 maybe owner or maybe A&P...  see part 43 (think Concord battery)
 
 TC means that it is the factory part and can be installed with a log book 
 entry.
 
 STC means that someone has done it before, the FAA has blessed it and you 
 can install it with a 337 and be guaranteed acceptance.
 
 337 with no STC means that you hope the FAA will approve what you have 
 installed!
 
 Andy Thomas
 
 ---
 
  |  | - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		mark.t.mueller(at)comcast Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 4:20 am    Post subject: Oil Temp Followup | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Let me throw my two cents in here:
 
 1) I never had a problem with oil temps and my stock oil cooler.  Never
 higher than 195 on my digital monitor, except in a long climb from FL in
 July.  I think your oil temps may be symptomatic of something else...
 
 2) PMA does NOT mean "same as factory", it merely means the FAA has approved
 the production methods and materials to fabricate the parts as sumbitted.
 PMA alone does not mean you can put the part on your plane unless it is
 PMA'd as the exact replacement part per the original TC and drawings as I
 understand the regs...  As Gary has described, you can get PMA on a new
 style cowling, but you still need the STC to mount it on a Grumman!
 
 3) TC only applies to the aircraft as designed and submitted to the FAA, and
 it's operating limitations. Notice that Cirrus is not re-accomplishing the
 TC for the SR-22 with Turbo-normalizing, even though it will be a factory
 option! The OEM figured it would be easier/faster/cheaper to licence Tornado
 Alley's new STC - and they are probably right...
 
 4) STC means someone has submitted the appropriate data to the FAA, and the
 FAA accepted it for the specific application (so if Gary gets an STC for the
 AA-5B, it won't apply to the AA-1...)
 
 5) There are such things as one-time STCs, and Field Approved 337s that
 muddy the waters even further!
 
 I highly suggest you consult the regs for the final answers, I am just going
 from the top of my head.  Interestingly enough, the old, leaking oil cooler
 I recently pulled off my 1975 Tiger was a 1973 vintage on my 1975, and was
 OEM based upon my logbooks!
 
 Mark
 ___________________________________________________________________________
 I am not an A&P and I sometimes get upset at the very officious replies to 
 simple questions so here is my input.
 
 PMA means same as factory and you can install it with a log book entry. 
 maybe owner or maybe A&P...  see part 43 (think Concord battery)
 
 TC means that it is the factory part and can be installed with a log book 
 entry.
 
 STC means that someone has done it before, the FAA has blessed it and you 
 can install it with a 337 and be guaranteed acceptance.
 
 337 with no STC means that you hope the FAA will approve what you have 
 installed!
 
  |  | - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		GrummanDude
 
 
  Joined: 15 Jan 2006 Posts: 926 Location: Auburn, CA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 10:58 am    Post subject: Oil Temp Followup | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				yea, probably, but why would you cheap-out on an oil cooler?  I've used 
 the 8406R on several installations (Citabria, Cheetah) and I really 
 like them.  The 8406R is welded as opposed to vacuum brazed on the 
 cheaper ones.  I've had too many leaky vacuum brazed oil coolers to 
 even consider bothering with them.
 
 --
 
  |  | - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ Gary
 
AuCountry Aviation
 
Home of Team Grumman | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		923te(at)cox.net Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:37 am    Post subject: Oil Temp Followup | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				http://www.rvproject.com/20040519.html
 
 The above link might be if interest. This from an RV builder / flyer who 
 compared the performance of different oil coolers.
 
 The Stewart Warner comes out on top and is considered by Pacific oil coolers 
 to be around 15% more effecient at cooling thant the NDM or aero classic...
 
 
  
 yea, probably, but why would you cheap-out on an oil cooler?  I've used
 the 8406R on several installations (Citabria, Cheetah) and I really
 like them.  The 8406R is welded as opposed to vacuum brazed on the
 cheaper ones.  I've had too many leaky vacuum brazed oil coolers to
 even consider bothering with them.
 
 --
 
  |  | - The Matronics TeamGrumman-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?TeamGrumman-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		923te(at)cox.net Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		 | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |