 |
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
LarryRosen
Joined: 16 Jan 2006 Posts: 415 Location: Medford, NJ
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:12 pm Post subject: Load Analysis & Electrical Schematic |
|
|
I have posted on my web site the electrical schematic and load analysis
that I am considering. The electrical design is a single battery, dual
alternator design. Comment if you would.
<http://lrosen.nerv10.com/Electic/index.html>
Thanks to all who have before for a great load analysis layout for the .
--
Larry Rosen
RV-10 #356
http://lrosen.nerv10.com
| - The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List |
|
_________________ Larry Rosen
#40356
N205EN (reserved)
<http> |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bob.kaufmann(at)cox.net Guest
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:33 pm Post subject: Load Analysis & Electrical Schematic |
|
|
I would consider a dual battery instead of a dual alternator.
Bob K
All I know about electricity is that the paddles tingle after the juice goes
into them.
Do not archive
--
| - The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
armywrights(at)adelphia.n Guest
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:01 pm Post subject: Load Analysis & Electrical Schematic |
|
|
Really? I guess as Bob N. says, your design goals must be the deciding
factor on your decision.
Either option is viable. And even though the U.S. Army doesn't get it right
all the time, they've opted for a single battery, dual alternator design in
their single-engine helicopters. Of course, the option for the 2d battery
is there, but that's usually left for cold-soaked aircraft needing the amps
to start in the middle of the night with no ground power units available.
Now if you plan on a hangared plane where you can hook up a ground power
cable if it's too cold, you may want to choose the single battery/dual
alternator setup. Then you don't have to immediately start the 30 minute
"my-battery-is-going-dead" clock if your only alternator fails that powers
your glass panel.
I'm sure there are some more nice battery/alternator wars in the
aeroelectric list archives that go into choices due to weight, c.g., spare
engine pads, etc. in addition to original design goals.
Rob Wright
#392
Fuse
--
| - The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GenGrumpy(at)aol.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 6:01 pm Post subject: Load Analysis & Electrical Schematic |
|
|
In a message dated 10/5/2006 2:01:04 AM Central Standard Time, armywrights(at)adelphia.net writes:
Quote: | --> RV10-List message posted by: "Rob Wright" <armywrights(at)adelphia.net>
Really? I guess as Bob N. says, your design goals must be the deciding
factor on your decision.
Either option is viable. And even though the U.S. Army doesn't get it right
all the time, they've opted for a single battery, dual alternator design in
their single-engine helicopters. Of course, the option for the 2d battery
is there, but that's usually left for cold-soaked aircraft needing the amps
to start in the middle of the night with no ground power units available.
Now if you plan on a hangared plane where you can hook up a ground power
cable if it's too cold, you may want to choose the single battery/dual
alternator setup. Then you don't have to immediately start the 30 minute
"my-battery-is-going-dead" clock if your only alternator fails that powers
your glass panel.
I'm sure there are some more nice battery/alternator wars in the
aeroelectric list archives that go into choices due to weight, c.g., spare
engine pads, etc. in addition to original design goals.
Rob Wright
#392
Fuse |
For what it's worth, I chose to use both dual alternators, dual batteries 2 busses (I can connect the 2 if needed). Just now into ground runs before first flight, and I am happy that I decided to go this way - redundancy for intended IFR flight.
Grumpy #40404
DO NOT ARCHIVE
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|