Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Antenna Location

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV10-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
wv4i(at)bellsouth.net
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 4:14 am    Post subject: Antenna Location Reply with quote

Seeing comments on antenna location in other threads, I thought a couple
of points have perhaps not been considered. First, I've been involved
with amateur radio for about 25 years, both mobile and fixed ops, and
including from my RV-6. My FCC callsign is WV4I, for the other hams on
this forum.

The problem with wing tip antennas, or antennas not located on the
fuselage or vertical stab leading edge or tip, would seem to be twofold.
One, re the wing tip location, such would likely cause a null in
reception (and transmission) primarily oriented in the direction of the
wing. Also, if the aircraft antenna is of one orientation, e.g.
horizontal, and the target station is vertical oriented (polarized, to
be precise), typically a 20db path loss occurs. Every 3db loss equates
to roughly a 50% drop in signal strength.

Another issue that may arise with antennas mounted parallel to metal
structures is that they become detuned. As an antenna is "cut" to
resonate at a desired frequency, with a given bandwidth, e.g. 118-136mhz
at <2:1 SWR, this resonance point can be be altered, diminished, or even
eliminated by nearby metal objects. Antenna resonance is important to
good receiver or transceiver performance, and in the case of
transmitters without high SWR protective circuitry, high SWR can damage
final output transistors.

This gets to be a very complex subject quickly, and I'm no electrical
engineer, but just some thoughts to consider on antenna placement.

Link McGarity
#40622
RV6/N42GF/flying, non-builder


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
LessDragProd(at)aol.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 7:44 am    Post subject: Antenna Location Reply with quote

Bob Archer's Sportcraft wingtip antenna's are gamma antenna's.

If the wingtip antenna is a gamma antenna, instead of a dipole antenna, do your comments still apply?

It's my simplistic understanding that a gamma antenna receives on the ground plane, which is the airframe of the aircraft. That's why it is so important to get good electrical contact along a distributed attachment of the base of the Sportcraft wingtip antenna to the wing skin.
(With the antenna mounted inside the fiberglass wingtip, the wing skin dimples for the antenna attachment need to have the paint removed for good electrical contact through the attaching screws.)

Jim Ayers

In a message dated 11/13/2006 4:16:35 AM Pacific Standard Time, wv4i(at)bellsouth.net writes:
Quote:
--> RV10-List message posted by: Link McGarity <wv4i(at)bellsouth.net>

Seeing comments on antenna location in other threads, I thought a couple
of points have perhaps not been considered. First, I've been involved
with amateur radio for about 25 years, both mobile and fixed ops, and
including from my RV-6. My FCC callsign is WV4I, for the other hams on
this forum.

The problem with wing tip antennas, or antennas not located on the
fuselage or vertical stab leading edge or tip, would seem to be twofold.
One, re the wing tip location, such would likely cause a null in
reception (and transmission) primarily oriented in the direction of the
wing. Also, if the aircraft antenna is of one orientation, e.g.
horizontal, and the target station is vertical oriented (polarized, to
be precise), typically a 20db path loss occurs. Every 3db loss equates
to roughly a 50% drop in signal strength.

Another issue that may arise with antennas mounted parallel to metal
structures is that they become detuned. As an antenna is "cut" to
resonate at a desired frequency, with a given bandwidth, e.g. 118-136mhz
at <2:1 SWR, this resonance point can be be altered, diminished, or even
eliminated by nearby metal objects. Antenna resonance is important to
good receiver or transceiver performance, and in the case of
transmitters without high SWR protective circuitry, high SWR can damage
final output transistors.

This gets to be a very complex subject quickly, and I'm no electrical
engineer, but just some thoughts to consider on antenna placement.

Link McGarity
#40622
RV6/N42GF/flying, non-builder



[quote][b]


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
AV8ORJWC



Joined: 13 Jul 2006
Posts: 1149
Location: Aurora, Oregon "Home of VANS"

PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 8:04 am    Post subject: Antenna Location Reply with quote

It is great to have a clear, concise and valued response to this easily
misunderstood subject of RF propagation and SWR.

John Cox
#40600
N49CX and amateur W7COX

--


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
apilot2(at)gmail.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 8:36 am    Post subject: Antenna Location Reply with quote

Your comments are certainly on target for com antennas. However, for
nav antennas you NEED horizontal polarization, as all VOR and GS
signals are horizontally polarized. Fuselage is no more blanking of a
wing tip than it is blanking for antenna on vertical fin recieving
signal below the aircraft.

On 11/13/06, Link McGarity <wv4i(at)bellsouth.net> wrote:
Quote:

The problem with wing tip antennas, or antennas not located on the
fuselage or vertical stab leading edge or tip, would seem to be twofold.
One, re the wing tip location, such would likely cause a null in
reception (and transmission) primarily oriented in the direction of the
wing. Also, if the aircraft antenna is of one orientation, e.g.
horizontal, and the target station is vertical oriented (polarized, to
be precise), typically a 20db path loss occurs. Every 3db loss equates
to roughly a 50% drop in signal strength.


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
wcurtis(at)core.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 1:33 pm    Post subject: Antenna Location Reply with quote

With respect to your rf experience, there is no problem with wingtip for VHF navigation antennas. You have explained below why only navigation antennas are primarily placed in the wingtip. Comm antennas do not work well in the wingtip. Notice that all VHF navigational antenna are mounted horizontally and are polarized as such. Communication antennas on the other hand are mounted vertically and polarized as such. Since the wingtips are set up very well for horizontal installation, they work quite well for navigational antennas. I think the question was in regard to navigational antennas only. Search the archives, I think this has been previously discussed ad nauseam. >The problem with wing tip antennas, or antennas not located on the >fuselage or vertical stab leading edge or tip, would seem to be twofold. >One, re the wing tip location, such would likely cause a null in >reception (and transmission) primarily oriented in the direction of the >wing. Also, if the aircraft antenna is of one orientation, e.g. >horizontal, and the target station is vertical oriented (polarized, to >be precise), typically a 20db path loss occurs. Every 3db loss equates >to roughly a 50% drop in signal strength. William Curtis http://wcurtis.nerv10.com/ [quote][b]

- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV10-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group